Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07610018

Cerebral Microembolization During Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Comparison of Different Pulsed Field Ablation Systems

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group interventional study will compare cerebral microembolization during pulmonary vein isolation between different pulsed field ablation systems in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Adult patients with an indication for catheter ablation will be randomized to one of the included ablation systems: PulseSelect, Varipulse, Farapulse, Sphere-9, or Sphere-360. Microembolic signals will be assessed using transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure. The primary outcome will be the difference in the change in microembolic signal burden, expressed as ΔMES, between the different ablation systems.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UH Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, parallel-group interventional trial conducted at Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia and University Hospital Center Sisters of Charity, Zagreb, Croatia. The study will include adult patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who have a clinical indication for catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation.

Eligible patients will be randomized using a computer-generated randomization sequence to undergo pulmonary vein isolation with one of the following pulsed field ablation systems: PulseSelect, Varipulse, Farapulse, Sphere-9, or Sphere-360. All procedures will be performed according to standard clinical practice, with continuous periprocedural anticoagulation in accordance with current guidelines.

Cerebral microembolization will be assessed using transcranial Doppler. The examination will be performed immediately before the ablation procedure and repeated after the procedure. The presence and number of microembolic signals will be recorded. This will allow assessment of changes in microembolic signal burden within each group and comparison of these changes between different pulsed field ablation systems.

Demographic, clinical, and procedural data will be collected, including age, sex, type of atrial fibrillation, comorbidities, procedure duration, number of ablation applications, and procedural complications. The study will also record procedure-related clinical neurological events.

The primary outcome will be the difference in the change in the number of microembolic signals before and after the procedure, expressed as ΔMES, between the different pulsed field ablation systems. Secondary outcomes will include within-group changes in microembolic signal burden, incidence of new microembolic signals after the procedure, association between procedural parameters and ΔMES, and occurrence of procedure-related neurological events.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Indication for catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation
  • Feasibility of transcranial Doppler assessment
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Recent stroke or transient ischemic attack
  • Significant cerebrovascular disease preventing reliable transcranial Doppler assessment
  • Severe valvular or structural heart disease
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to receive anticoagulation

Treatment and study plan

Pulsed field ablation using PulseSelect system

Device

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the PulseSelect pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.

Pulsed field ablation using Varipulse system

Device

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Varipulse pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.

Pulsed field ablation using Farapulse system

Device

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Farapulse pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedu

Pulsed field ablation using Sphere-9 system

Device

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Sphere-9 pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure.

Pulsed field ablation using Sphere-360 system

Device

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the Sphere-360 pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing clinically indicated catheter ablation. Cerebral microembolic signals will be assessed by transcranial Doppler before and after the procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in microembolic signal burden after pulmonary vein isolation

    Time frame: During procedure

    Difference in the number of cerebral microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler before and after pulmonary vein isolation, expressed as ΔMES, compared between the different pulsed field ablation systems.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Within-group change in microembolic signal burden

    Time frame: During procedure

    Change in the number of cerebral microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler before and after pulmonary vein isolation within each pulsed field ablation system group.

  2. Incidence of new microembolic signals after ablation

    Time frame: Immediately after the ablation procedure

    Proportion of participants with newly detected cerebral microembolic signals on transcranial Doppler after pulmonary vein isolation.

  3. Procedure-related clinical neurological events

    Time frame: From the start of the ablation procedure through 72 hours after the procedure

    Occurrence of clinically evident neurological events related to the ablation procedure, including stroke or transient ischemic attack.

  4. Association between procedure duration and ΔMES

    Time frame: During procedure

    Association between total procedure duration and the change in cerebral microembolic signal burden before and after pulmonary vein isolation.

  5. Association between number of ablation applications and ΔMES

    Time frame: During procedure

    Association between the number of pulsed field ablation applications delivered during pulmonary vein isolation and the change in cerebral microembolic signal burden before and after the procedure.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ivan Zeljković, PhD,MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+385917823289

Mihovil Santini, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+385958101778

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ivan Zeljkovic

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital Center Sisters of Charity, Zagreb, Croatia
  • University Hospital Dubrava

Registry information

Official study title

Cerebral Microembolization During Pulmonary Vein Isolation: a Randomized Comparison of Different Pulsed Field Ablation Systems

Acronym: MICROPFA

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 27, 2026
Registry last updated
May 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.