Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Becky Lammers, MS
CONTACT
Rajani Sebastian, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05093673
The optimal site of neuromodulation for post-stroke aphasia has yet to be established. This study will investigate whether multiple sessions of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) boosts language therapy in helping people recover from aphasia as well as predict who is likely to respond to cerebellar tDCS.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Becky Lammers, MS
CONTACT
Rajani Sebastian, PhD
CONTACT
Aphasia is a devastating complication of stroke. Speech and language treatment (SLT) can be helpful in restoring language function, but not all individuals show improvement. Recent studies indicate that Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a promising adjuvant approach to enhance the effectiveness of SLT. tDCS is a noninvasive, non-painful, electrical stimulation of the brain. It is believed that tDCS boosts neural plasticity that underlies recovery with SLT. A majority of the tDCS studies of aphasia have stimulated the left hemisphere regions. However, left hemisphere lesions common in post-stroke aphasia affect the electrical field in unpredictable ways, potentially preventing stimulation from reaching perilesional tissue associated with optimal recovery. The investigators' prior work addressed this problem by stimulating a novel region, the right cerebellum. The right cerebellum is connected to the left hemisphere and involved in a variety of cognitive and language functions, including naming, which is often impaired in people with aphasia. The investigators' work has shown that cerebellar tDCS is safe, easily tolerated, and improved language skills in a number of stroke participants with aphasia. The proposed project will build on these findings by conducting a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, trial to determine the effectiveness of cathodal tDCS to the right cerebellum for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. The investigators will test the hypothesis that 15 sessions of cerebellar tDCS combined with an evidenced-based anomia treatment (semantic feature analysis, SFA) is associated with greater gains in accuracy in naming pictures, compared to 15 sessions of sham combined with semantic feature analysis
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2 mA of cathodal tDCS is induced between two 5cm X 5cm saline soaked sponges where the cathode sponge is placed on the right cerebellum. Ramping up of the current to 2 mA occurs over 15-30 seconds to allow participants to habituate to the tingling sensation. The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2 mA for a maximum of 25 minutes.
Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) is a treatment technique designed to improve lexical retrieval by increasing the level of activation within a semantic network. The treatment will proceed according to a series of steps including naming aloud the target picture, generating semantic features, naming aloud the target picture again, and generating a sentence using the target word.
2 mA of cathodal tDCS is induced between two 5cm X 5cm saline soaked sponges where the cathode sponge is placed on the right cerebellum. Ramping up of the current to 2 mA occurs over 15-30 seconds to allow participants to habituate to the tingling sensation. Then, the current will be ramped back down to 0 mA in the sham condition. Termination of the stimulation after the ramping up process is generally undetectable, and the brief duration of stimulation yields no functional effects.
Time frame: Pre-treatment to one week after the end of SFA treatment
Behavioral measure of change in untrained naming. Scores ranges from 0 to 175 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and at 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
Behavioral measure of change in untrained naming. Scores ranges from 0 to 175 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.
Time frame: Pre-treatment to one week after the end of SFA treatment
Behavioral measure of change in trained naming. Scores ranges from 0 to 50 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and at 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment
Behavioral measure of change in trained naming. Scores ranges from 0 to 50 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment
Participants will describe the Cookie Theft Picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Analysis of descriptions of the Cookie Theft picture can provide useful and reliable information about connected speech. Content units captures the quantity of information conveyed. Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture.
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment
Participants will describe the Cookie Theft Picture from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Analysis of descriptions of the Cookie Theft picture can provide useful and reliable information about connected speech. Syllables included in the picture description are counted. Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. The average rate of syllables per content unit produced can then be calculated and interpreted as a measure of efficiency in producing relevant information in the task.
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment
Functional communication skills will be assessed using the Communication Activities of Daily Living, third edition (CADL-3). This test contains 50 items assessing communication activities in seven areas and participants receive a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each item. Higher scores reflect better communicative success.
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment
It consists of 39 items which cover three domains: physical, communication, and psychosocial. Domain and overall mean scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicative of better quality of life.
Time frame: Pre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment
The General Health Questionnaire is a measure of psychological distress and it is 12 item scale. Scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores are indicative of higher distress.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Becky Lammers, MS
CONTACT
Rajani Sebastian, PhD
CONTACT
Johns Hopkins University
Other
Acronym: CeSAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06615973
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT03821129
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737431
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial Details