Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03444168

Central Nervous System Amplification in Lumbar Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to learn whether or not certain risk factors and patient characteristics are linked with and possibly can predict the development of chronic pain after lumbar spine surgery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For All Participants:

  • Ability to read and speak English to allow for written informed consent, phenotyping, and patient-reported outcomes measures

Exclusion criteria

For All Participants:

  • Individuals receiving or applying for compensation or disability and other aspects associated with potential secondary gain
  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Severe physical impairment
  • Co-morbid medical conditions that may significantly impair physical functional status
  • Illicit drug or unreported opioid use
  • Medical or psychiatric conditions that in the judgment of study personnel would preclude participation in this study
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Liver failure
  • Self-reported liver cirrhosis
  • Self-reported hepatitis
  • Severe Cardiovascular disease

Inclusion criteria

for Candidates for Lumbar Spine Surgery:

  • Deemed to be a candidate for primary lumbar spine surgery including but not limited to: lumbar laminectomy, discectomy, and fusion/instrumentation
  • Diagnostic clinical and radiographic findings including but not limited to: lumbar degenerative disc disease, lumbar disc protrusion, herniation, or extrusion, lumbar spondylosis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis or spondylolysis
  • Willingness to participate in longitudinal follow-up or 6-months after their surgery.

Exclusion criteria

for Candidates for Lumbar Spine Surgery:

  • History of previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Indication for lumbar spine surgery is due to spinal cancer-related diagnosis
  • Need for urgent or emergent lumbar spine surgery

Inclusion criteria

for Candidates with Lumbar Failed Back Surgery Syndrome:

  • Chronic low back pain (+/- leg pain) for >= to 6 months duration after lumbar spine surgery (with or without instrumented fusion)
  • Low back pain severity is moderate to severe (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] Score >=4)

Exclusion criteria

for Candidates with Lumbar Failed Back Surgery Syndrome:

  • Have a structural spinal lesion that would make them a current candidate for a revision lumbar spine surgery

Inclusion criteria

for Healthy Volunteers:

  • No major diseases or diagnoses influencing pain or function

Exclusion criteria

for Healthy Volunteers:

  • No chronic pain condition
  • Score 3 or greater on the 2011 FM Survey Criteria (i.e. individuals with very mild fatigue or sleep problems will be allowed to participate as this is extremely common in the general population)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Pain Severity - 50% Reduction Responders vs Nonresponders

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Month 6

    Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The BPI scores are a numerical rating scale and range from 0 to 10. A score of 0 is equal to no pain and a score of 10 is equal to pain as bad as you can imagine.

  2. Fibromylagia-ness (FMness)

    Time frame: Baseline

    2011 Fibromyalgia Survey score is calculated by combining the widespread pain index (WPI) and the Symptom Severity Scale (SSI) to derive a score from 0-31. Scores greater than or equal to 13 indicate a diagnosis of Fibromyalgia. Higher scores indicate the degree of central sensitization present in a given individual.

  3. PROMIS T-score - Fatigue, Physical Function, Sleep-Related Impairment

    Time frame: Baseline

    PROMIS measures to be included are Depression, Anxiety, Physical Functioning, Fatigue, Sleep Impairment, Emotional Support, and Social Participation. Each questionnaire usually has 4-16 response options ranging in value from one to five. The total raw score for a short form with all questions answered is the sum of the values of the response to each question. The total range of potential raw scores depends on the number of questions being asked, for example, a 6 item form would have a range from is 6 to 30. After the raw score is calculated, a T-score metric is used to convert the raw score to a T-score. On the T-score metric, a score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that mean. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals "more of the concept being measured", this could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending on the concept being measured.

  4. PROMIS T-score - Anxiety, Depression, Emotional Support, Pain Interference, Satisfaction With Social Roles

    Time frame: Baseline

    PROMIS measures to be included are Depression, Anxiety, Physical Functioning, Fatigue, Sleep Impairment, Emotional Support, and Social Participation. Each questionnaire usually has 4-16 response options ranging in value from one to five. The total raw score for a short form with all questions answered is the sum of the values of the response to each question. The total range of potential raw scores depends on the number of questions being asked, for example, a 6 item form would have a range from is 6 to 30. After the raw score is calculated, a T-score metric is used to convert the raw score to a T-score. On the T-score metric, a score of 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that mean. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals "more of the concept being measured", this could be a desirable or undesirable outcome, depending on the concept being measured.

  5. Oswestry Disability Index

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Oswestry Disability Index will be used to assess low back pain. There are 10 sections on the index. Each section has a possible score of 5. The total possible range of scores is 0 to 50. A score of 0 indicates no pain. A score of 50 indicates the person is bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Coping Strategies Questionnaire - CAT

    Time frame: Baseline

    A 6-item catastrophizing scale that measures ways to cope or deal with pain. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-6. Scores can range from 0-36, with the higher the score the higher the rate of catastrophizing.

Other outcomes

  1. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Pressure Pain Sensitivity by Algometry - Trapezius

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pressure pain sensitivity is measured by Algometry (measured at the trapezius and lumbar spine). It yields a pressure pain threshold value measured in kPA. Tests were performed at the Left and Right trapezius in triplicate at each site and the average is calculated and used for analysis.

  2. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Pressure Pain Sensitivity by Algometry - Lower Back

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pressure pain sensitivity is measured by Algometry (measured at the trapezius and lumbar spine). It yields a pressure pain threshold value measured in kPA.Tests were performed at the Left and Right lumbar spine in triplicate at each site and the average is calculated and used for analysis.

  3. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Pressure Pain Sensitivity by Multimodal Automated Sensory Testing

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pressure pain sensitivity is measured by the Multimodal Automated Sensory Testing (MAST) System (measured at the thumbnail). It yields a pressure pain threshold value measured in kg/cm2. Thumb Pain30, Pain40, and Pain50 are the pressure intensities that provoke a pain rating of 30/100, 40/100, and 50/100, respectively. Thumb Pain Tolerance is the pressure intensity that provokes a response greater than or equal to 80/100.

  4. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) - Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

    Time frame: Change from Post-stimulus test at Baseline visit to Pre-stimulus test at Baseline visit

    Conditioned Pain Modulation as measured at the thumbnail using the MAST. It yields a numerical pain rating difference on a 0-100 numerical scale that can either be positive or negative called CPM magnitude. CPM magnitude will be calculated as the difference (post-pre) in the mean of the three pain ratings given to the test stimulus prior to the conditioning stimuli and the three pain ratings of the test stimulus given during the conditioning stimuli. A reduction in test stimulus rating by conditioning stimulation implies functional (inhibitory) CPM, and the degree of reduction expresses the efficiency of CPM.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.