Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT03581565
Cement retention has been widely used for implant-supported fixed partial dentures in daily dental practice. The cementation approach indeed offers straightforward clinical application protocol which is basically conceptualized for tooth/teeth supported fixed restorations. However, removal of excess cement around implant restorations presents specific difficulties. More importantly, there are certain biological consequences due to residual cement leftover in peri-implant sulcus. There is no evidence based guidance with regards to cementation techniques applied for implant supported fixed restorations due to limited clinical studies. Therefore the aim of this clinical trial is to compare three different cementation technique with regards to removal of excess cement and other clinical subsidiaries (abutment margin, crown surface and contour) involving indirectly as well.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Single-tooth implant crowns to replace missing molar tooth were addressed to qualify and quantify residual cement on implant-abutment complex and peri-implant soft tissue following cementation. Thirty bone-level dental implants of one kind enrolled in the study. Prior to delivery of screw-retained crowns completed for usual treatment, implants were allocated randomly to a trial comparison group. Three different cement loading approach, ten in each group, was applied using cement-retained trial crowns on prefabricated metal abutments. Following completion of the assigned cementation technique, the trial crown was removed with its abutment accessing from the occlusal hole prepared after removal of excess cement. Then, the presence of residual cement on implant-abutment complex and implant soft tissue in accordance with axial and proximal surfaces was qualified. To quantify the amount of residual cement in accordance with location and distribution, the crown-abutment complex was digitized three-dimensionally using an intra-oral scanner. The output of surface data was evaluated in virtual 3-D image for cement excess, when detected location in the abutment-crown complex is recorded, area and distribution was calculated using a software. The frequency of occurrence and quantity of residual cement of 3-different cementation techniques was statistically evaluated using logistic and linear regression model separately considering abutment margin, crown surface and contour.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
intraoral cementation of single-tooth implant crowns with three different technique, intraoral removal of cement excess upon setting
Time frame: 15 minutes
removal of cemented crown-abutment complex to detect excess cement on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately scoring: presence or absence
Time frame: 30 minutes
digitalization of the removed crown-abutment complexes those scored with cement presence, then using a software, virtual selection of existing cement to calculate the area in millimeter square and to define the direction and the extension in millimeters on the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown and abutment separately
Time frame: 15 minutes
removal of cemented crown-abutment complex to detect excess cement on the peri-implant soft tissue contacting the mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of crown-implant complex scoring: presence or absence
Time frame: 30 minutes
Recording of stock abutment margin location at mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces in relation to peri-implant soft tissue level measurement in millimeters
Defining of abutment to crown transition angle at mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces description as concave, convex or flat
Time frame: 20 minutes
evaluation of peri-apical radiographs of cemented crowns to detect presence of excess cement on mesial and distal surfaces scoring: presence or absence
Kıvanç Akça
Other
Effect of Cementation Technique Applied for Single-tooth Implant Crowns on Residual Cement: A Three-arm Parallel-group Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06083246
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05024760
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Infection
Tacoma, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07700628
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Caserta, CE, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07678892
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Kristianstad, Sweden
View Trial Details