Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07311317

Cellular-Level Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer

Accurate intraoperative margin assessment in breast cancer surgery remains challenging. Current reliance on frozen section pathology is limited by prolonged processing time, sampling constraints, and resource intensity, contributing to variable outcomes.

The EndoSCell Scanner is a novel cellular-resolution fluorescence-guided imaging technology designed to address these limitations. It enables real-time, pathology-level visualization of malignant cellular features at the surgical bed. With a 3mm probe allowing comprehensive 360° margin assessment, it reduces procedural time to under five minutes and may significantly lower secondary surgery rates.

This prospective, self-controlled study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the EndoSCell Scanner for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing mastectomy. Its performance will be systematically compared against both frozen section and final paraffin pathology to validate sensitivity and operational efficiency. If proven effective, this technology could become a standard adjunct tool, standardizing precision in breast cancer surgery and improving patient outcomes by enhancing surgical consistency.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is a multicenter, prospective, self-controlled study. Basis for Sample Size Calculation: According to the results of the first phase, the accuracy of frozen pathology is 98.2%. Assuming that the detection interpretation results of ES are not inferior to intraoperative frozen pathology, a one-sided test will be conducted, with α=0.02, 1-β=0.8, and the non-inferiority margin is 0.02. The estimated required sample size is 593. Considering a 10% exclusion rate, the total sample size will be 659. Each patient is expected to have at least 4 samples taken, totaling 165 patients.

Data Collection:1)Basic patient information: age, gender; 2)Tumor diagnosis (including imaging diagnosis): location, size, and staging; 3)Intraoperative collected information: surgery start time, surgery end time; 4)Training and testing records of the physicians in the ES interpretation group; 5)Interpretation records: a.ES start time, ES interpretation end time, ES interpretation results, ES image satisfaction; b.Frozen pathology submission time, report receipt time, report results; c.Paraffin pathology submission time, report time, and report results.

The statistical analysis will be performed using SAS statistical software, version 9.4 or higher. All statistical tests will be two-sided. A P value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The description of quantitative indicators will include the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum, and interquartile range. The description of categorical indicators will use the number and percentage of each category. The comparison of general conditions between the two groups will be analyzed using appropriate methods based on the type of indicators. The consistency evaluation of quantitative data will use the Bland-Altman method and ICC.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 - 70 years
  • Patients scheduled for breast tumor resection
  • Clinically or radiologically showing a solitary lesion and
  • (Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy) Maximum tumor diameter ≤ 5cm;
  • cN0-1;
  • No clinical or imaging evidence of nipple, skin, chest wall invasion, or distant metastasis before surgery.
  • Subjects voluntarily sign informed consent or are exempted from signing upon approval by the ethics committee.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inflammatory breast cancer;
  • Patients allergic to methylene blue and sodium fluorescein;
  • Unable to understand the trial requirements or unable to complete the study follow-up plan;
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women;
  • Patients unable to complete follow-up due to mental illness, cognitive or emotional disorders;
  • Those with severe comorbidities (such as organ dysfunction, immune deficiency) or poor general condition;
  • Those participating in other clinical studies that may affect this trial;
  • Those for whom satisfactory specimens for both frozen pathology and paraffin pathology cannot be obtained during surgery;
  • Those who cannot obtain a paraffin pathology report.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the EndoSCell Scanner (ES) detection, using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, in comparison to rapid frozen section (FS) pathology.

    Time frame: 3 month

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Zhenggui DU

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 13880768222

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

West China Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Accuracy of a Novel Cellular-Level Fluorescence-Guided Imaging Technique in Scanning Tumor Margins During Breast Tumor Resection: A Prospective, Self-Controlled Study

Acronym: FLASH

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 30, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.