ceftobiprole medocaril
DrugCeftobiprole 500 mg (as 667 mg ceftobiprole medocaril) as a 2 h infusion
NCT Number: NCT03138733
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole medocaril versus a comparator in the treatment of patients with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Central Hospital de San Isidro Melchor Posse, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Patients were randomized 1:1 to ceftobiprole or the comparator regimen. Randomization was stratified by study site, dialysis status, and prior antibacterial treatment use within 7 days before randomization.
The three phases of the study were:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ceftobiprole 500 mg (as 667 mg ceftobiprole medocaril) as a 2 h infusion
Daptomycin 6 mg/kg (up to 10 mg/kg based on institutional standards) as a 0.5 h infusion, with or without aztreonam
Time frame: PTE visit on Day 70 (± 5 days) post-randomization
Comparison of overall success rates in the mITT population
Overall success at PTE for the mITT population was defined as all of the following criteria being met (Responder):
Time frame: At PTE visit on Day 70 (± 5 days) post-randomization
Comparison of overall success rates in the Clinical Evaluable (CE) population
Overall success at PTE for the CE population was defined as all of the following criteria being met (Responder):
Time frame: At PTE visit on Day 70 (± 5 days) post-randomization
Comparison of microbiological eradication rates in the mITT population. Microbiological eradication rate was defined as a negative blood culture for S. aureus during study treatment and another negative blood culture during the follow up period up to PTE.
Time frame: At PTE visit on Day 70 (± 5 days) post-randomization
Comparison of all-cause mortality rates in the mITT population
Time frame: Assessment after Day 7 post-randomization through to post-treatment evaluation (PTE) visit on Day 70 (± 5 days)
Comparison of complication rates in the mITT population defined by number of patients with development of new metastatic foci or other complications of SAB after Day 7
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks post-randomization
Time-to-event in the mITT Bloodstream clearance was defined as two consecutive study days with blood-culture-negative assessments for S. aureus, without any subsequent S. aureus relapse or reinfection
Time frame: AEs were assessed from the first dose of study drug through the post-treatment evaluation (PTE) visit on Day 70 (± 5 days)
Treatment-emergent adverse events in the safety population
Basilea Pharmaceutica
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Establish the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftobiprole Medocaril Compared to Daptomycin in the Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia, Including Infective Endocarditis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00198302
Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections
View Trial DetailsNCT05184764
Bacteremia, Bacteremia Due to Staphylococcus Aureus
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02357966
Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections
Columbus, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06249451
Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections
Greifswald, Germany
View Trial Details