Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03015285

CBT for Anxiety Sensitivity vs. Disorder-specific CBT: An RCT

Adults with high anxiety sensitivity (AS) and a mental health diagnosis of anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to either transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for AS or disorder-specific CBT for their primary mental health problem. The study outcomes - AS, anxiety, mood, and substance use symptoms, and functional impairment - will be assessed at pre-and post-treatment and 6 and 12 months post-treatment via standardized self-report measures completed by participants and a standardized diagnostic interview.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

While our previous work has provided some evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for anxiety sensitivity(AS) reduces mental health symptoms, the current study aims to determine whether this treatment works as well as traditional disorder-specific CBT (which aims to treat the specific disorder a person presents with, such as CBT for panic disorder for someone with panic disorder) in treating anxiety and depression. This will be the first study to have looked at this question.

Our objectives are to determine:

  • if there is a difference in the extent to which CBT for AS vs. disorder-specific CBT reduces, in the short- and long-term, a) AS, b) symptoms of a person's primary and secondary mental health problems, and c) functional disability (i.e., a person's ability to function in day-to-day life);
  • if the two treatments lead to differences in the number of participants who no longer meet the requirements for a diagnosis (of their primary or secondary mental health problems) in the short- and long-term; and
  • if the treatments are seen as similarly satisfactory by participants.

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned (via online random number generator) to either transdiagnostic CBT for AS or disorder-specific CBT for their primary mental health problem. Both CBT interventions are evidence-based, guided by treatment manuals/workbooks (provided to participants), and involve 12 weekly therapy sessions. The AS intervention will also involve a physical exercise component (i.e., running/brisk walking 3x/week starting on week 5) and participants will be provided with a wearable fitness device designed to provide physiological indices of arousal and track physical activity. The study outcomes - AS, anxiety, mood, and substance use symptoms, and functional impairment - will be assessed at pre-and post-treatment and 6 and 12 months post-treatment via standardized self-report measures completed by participants and a standardized diagnostic interview.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Literate
  • High Anxiety Sensitivity (high AS, participants must score ≥23 on the Anxiety Sensitivity Index - 3)
  • Live in the surrounding area of Halifax, Nova Scotia or Fredericton, New Brunswick
  • Must have a primary diagnosis of one of Agoraphobia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Panic Disorder (PD), Other Specified Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), or Illness Anxiety Disorder (IAD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5; APA, 2013) as determined by a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders

Exclusion criteria

  • Must not have any contraindications to physical exercise
  • Must not be engaged in another current psychotherapy as it may interfere with the treatment under investigation
  • Need to be able to attend intervention sessions at Dalhousie University or the University of New Brunswick
  • Must not have current Bipolar Disorder and psychosis nor current suicidal intent

Treatment and study plan

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Behavioral

A type of talk therapy called cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) will be delivered to both groups.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in anxiety sensitivity: the Anxiety Sensitivity Index - 3 (ASI-3)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up.

    The ASI-3 is an 18-item self-report measure that indexes the amount of fear an individual experiences with respect to anxiety-related body sensations. Participants indicate the extent to which they agree or disagree with each item (e.g., "It scares me when my heart beats rapidly") on a 5-point Likert-type scale.

  2. Change in primary diagnosis (e.g., anxiety disorder or depression) symptoms

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    Primary diagnosis (e.g., anxiety disorder or depression) symptoms, as measured by a standardized score on one of the Panic Attack Questionnaire - IV, the Fear Questionnaire, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7-item, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, the Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale - 20-item, or the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9-item.

  3. Change in comorbid diagnosis (e.g., anxiety disorders or depression) symptoms

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up.

    Comorbid diagnosis (e.g., anxiety disorder or depression) symptoms, as measured by a standardized score on one of the Panic Attack Questionnaire - IV, the Fear Questionnaire, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7-item, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, the Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale - 20-item, or the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9-item.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic status as measured by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    Administered by a trained researcher blind to treatment condition. The SCID-5 has been widely used in numerous research studies and is well empirically validated. At each time point, we will assess participants' primary and secondary diagnoses as well as the overall number of diagnoses for which they qualify.

  2. General distress as measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales - 21. The DASS-21 is a shortened version of the 42-item DASS and is composed of three subscales: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Individuals indicate the extent to which a particular negative emotional state (e.g., "I found it difficult to relax") has applied to them over the past week on a 4-point Likert-type scale (0 = Did not apply to me at all to 3 = Applied to me very much or most of the time).

  3. General distress as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation measure (CORE-10)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) is a brief, 10-item self-report measure designed to assess common presentations of symptoms of psychological distress. Participants are asked to indicate how often in the past week they have felt a series of symptoms (e.g., "I have felt tense, anxious, or nervous") on a 5-point Likert-type scale.

  4. Functional disability as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    The Sheehan Disability Scale will be used to measure functional impairment in three domains: work/school, family life, and social. Using a 10-point visual analogue scale, participants rate the extent to which their general mental health symptoms disrupt their work/school, family life/responsibilities, and social life. Participants also indicate the number of days their mental health symptoms caused them to miss school/work as well as the number of days their symptoms had caused their performance to be reduced during the past week. The SDS is well-validated and widely used with a range of populations.

  5. Drinking Motives as measured by the Modified Drinking Motives Questionnaire - Revised (MDMQ-R)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    The MDMQ-R measures drinking motives. Respondents estimate how often they drink for the reason specified in each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale.

  6. Hazardous alcohol use as measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    Despite being designed as a screening tool, the AUDIT is commonly used to assess alcohol use problems pre- and post-treatment. The AUDIT is a 10-item self-report measure that asks participants to report on their frequency of alcohol use, binge drinking, and alcohol-dependent behaviours. Responses are scored on 5-point Likert-type scales. Finally, participants report if they have experienced problems caused by alcohol use on a 3-point Likert-type scale.

  7. Alcohol-related problems as measured by the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R)

    Time frame: baseline (i.e., start of study), 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

    The SIP-2R consists of the three items from each of five subscales. Participants are asked to indicate the frequency with which they have experienced each of 15 drinking-related problems on a 4-point Likert-type scale.

  8. Treatment alliance as measured by the Working Alliance Inventory - Short-form (WAI-SR)

    Time frame: Only at 12 weeks

    The WAI-SR is a 12-item self-report questionnaire comprised of three subscales: Goals, or agreement on the goals of therapy, Tasks, or agreement on the tasks of therapy, and Bonds, or the bond between the therapist and the client. Participants indicate the extent to which each of these statements reflects their experience on a 5-point Likert-type scale.

  9. Treatment satisfaction as measured by several short researcher-generated questions

    Time frame: Only at 12 weeks

    In order to assess satisfaction with the different components of treatment, participants will answer a series of open-ended questions about their experience (e.g., "Was the treatment convenient for you to engage in?"; "Did you find the telephone therapy sessions helpful?") after all parts of treatment are completed (i.e., at 12 weeks).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Dalhousie University
  • University of New Brunswick

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing the Efficacy of CBT for Anxiety Sensitivity to Disorder-specific CBT in Reducing Mental Health Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 10, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.