Heart Center Leipzig
Leipzig, Germany
NCT Number: NCT02924285
For therapy of symptomatic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) in subjects with structural heart disease the current European Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of second cardiac death recommend catheter ablation as well as amiodarone with a class IIa indication. Due to the lack of randomized data this study investigates the comparison of catheter ablation and amiodarone for PVC treatment in patients with structural heart disease. Therefore, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment strategies: 1) catheter ablation, or 2) amiodarone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–87 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Leipzig, Germany
Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are frequently encountered in patients with or without structural heart disease. Even though PVCs in healthy subjects are considered to be a benign arrhythmia. There is also evidence for the risk of a reversible cardiomyopathy due to the PVC-induced inter- and intraventricular dyssynchrony. Data show that elimination of PVCs by catheter ablation leads to an improvement of left ventricular dysfunction. In one-half of the heart failure patients frequent PVCs occur with more than 1000/24 h. In patients with structural heart disease premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) lead to an increased mortality risk with only a burden of 10 PVC per hour. Further decreasing of left ventricular function and worsening of heart failure are described. Therefore, therapy of frequent monomorphic PVCs is recommended in these subjects. Beta-blockers as part of standard therapy often remain ineffective or may lead to a paradoxic effect in patients with bradycardia. A limiting factor for selection of antiarrhythmic drug due to increasing mortality is the presence of structural heart disease. So in the most cases amiodarone is indicated. There are data showing improvement of LV function after suppression of PVCs by amiodarone with a significant reduction of the PVC burden in comparison to baseline. However, the adverse effects of amiodarone are well-known especially in long-term therapy. On the other hand, radiofrequency catheter ablation is a widely applied and safe treatment option for PVCs with a high acute success rate of up to 90% PVC reduction in various circumstances like pre-existing heart failure and post myocardial infarction subjects. Some small-sample studies show the benefit of catheter ablation in subjects with depressed LV function. To date, there are no randomized data for comparison of catheter ablation and amiodarone for therapy of PVCs in patients with structural heart disease.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Radiofrequency catheter ablation
Amiodarone, Verification of superiority of catheter ablation over amiodarone for treatment of PVCs in patients with structural heart disease as:
Antiarrhythmic Drug Amiodarone
Time frame: Baseline and after 6 weeks
difference of the PVC burden in a 24 h Holter registration after 6 weeks and at baseline expressed as the amount of the baseline value ΔVES_r = (VES_6 - VES_0) / VES_0
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: after 6 weeks and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline and after 12 months
University of Leipzig
Other
CAT-PVC Trial Catheter Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Therapy of Premature Ventricular Contractions in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: a Randomized Trial
Acronym: CAT-PVC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03860935
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid Cardiomyopathy
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03071835
Aging Frailty, Cardiomyopathies
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04634708
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01905670
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiovascular Diseases
Prague, Czechia
View Trial Details