Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02246751

Case Series_Targeted Training for Trunk Control Cerebral Palsy

Little is known about how children with cerebral palsy (CP) use their sensory systems (touch, sense of body position, balance organs in the inner ear, vision) to help them achieve trunk control for independent sitting. If a child with CP does not achieve trunk control by 4 years of age their prognosis for motor skill development including walking is poor. Clinical researchers at The Movement Centre in Oswestry, England have developed a method called Targeted Training in which children train trunk control in small segments from the top down using a custom fit training device. This study aims to examine how children with moderate to severe CP use sensory information for trunk control before, during and after a program of Targeted Training.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pediatric Balance Laboratory; University of Hartford;

West Hartford, Connecticut, 06117, United States

About this study

One of the major challenges of motor control is to understand how the central nervous system controls the degrees of freedom of the body. This is particularly evident in cerebral palsy (CP), which is the most prevalent chronic childhood motor disability and is one of the most disabling and costly chronic disorders of children and adults. Deficits in postural control and sensorimotor integration are hallmarks of CP. Although postural control of the trunk for independent sitting creates the foundation for all other motor tasks, surprisingly little is known about how children with CP use sensory input to guide their development of upright control (which occurs in typically developing infants by 8 months of age). This lack of knowledge limits our ability to effectively assess and treat children with neuromotor deficits in trunk control.

The objectives of this project are to identify sensory reliance and sensory re-weighting in a study of children with moderate-to-severe CP (4-12 years of age) before and after Targeted Training for Trunk Control. A novel trunk support device will enable testing of participants who lack (or are still developing) stable sitting. In experiments, kinematics of the head and trunk will be measured. Sensory reliance and re-weighting will be identified from postural trunk responses to sensory conflict stimuli consisting of tilts of a visual surround and/or tilts of a surface which participants sit upon. Generally, participants with a high reliance on vestibular feedback will remain upright with respect to gravity during all tests; whereas a high reliance on cutaneous or visual feedback will produce trunk sway away from upright and toward the surface or visual surround tilt, respectively. To tease apart biomechanical, physical, and neurological contributions to trunk sway, sensorimotor integration modeling will be used to complement data interpretation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • cerebral palsy
  • age 2-12 years
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level III, IV or V

Exclusion criteria

  • spinal fixation
  • fixed scoliosis
  • uncontrolled seizures

Treatment and study plan

Targeted Training for trunk control

Device

Orthotics Research and Locomotor Research Unit (ORLAU) standers will be custom fit to help the child train at the segmental level of the trunk where they begin to lose control of posture. The typical course of treatment involves loaning the customized equipment to each family for use in their home or in their child's educational setting. Training occurs once daily usually for 30-45 minutes. This is done 5 or 6 days per week. Training programs typically involve playing with balls or balloons or video games that motivate the child to hold the head erect and to wave the arms and hands and move the upper body. The researchers evaluate children every 8 weeks and adjust the stander to lower levels of support as the child gains control.

Other names: Segmental training for trunk control

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in sensory motor processes

    Time frame: 9 months and 1 and 3 months post training

    Change in sensory motor processes as evidenced by kinematic measures during sitting balance perturbation tasks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in gross motor functional skills (e.g. sitting, crawling, standing)

    Time frame: 9 months and 1 & 3 months post training

    The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM 66) is a standardized test of gross motor function that has been validated for children with cerebral palsy

  2. Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control

    Time frame: 2, 4, 6, 8 and 9 months and 1 & 3 months post training

    Change in the trunk segment where static, active or reactive control is lost.

Other outcomes

  1. Participation and Environment Measure for Children and Youth (CY) or Young Children (YC) (PEM-CY for children 5-12 years of age, or YC-PEM for children 2-5 years)

    Time frame: 9 months and 3 months post training

    The PEM-CY and YC-PEM are parent response questionnaires that measure participation frequency, extent of involvement and desire for change in sets of activities typical for the home, school or community.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Hartford

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Targeted Training on Sensorimotor Control of Trunk Posture

Acronym: CP_TT_UHart

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 23, 2014
Registry last updated
Sep 7, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.