Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00756496

Case Collection Study to Support Digital Mammography Image Software Change

The primary objective of this study is to compare image processing software to support a new image processing software application for a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female
  • > 40 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women, or women who may become pregnant
  • Mammographic evidence of breast surgery, prior radiation to the breast, needle projection or pre-biopsy markings are evident in the mammogram (but may include breast implants)
  • Palpable lesion or one that is visible by another modality
  • Inmates

Treatment and study plan

Mammography screening and diagnosis

Device

Mammography screening and diagnosis

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare Diagnostic Accuracy of 2 Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis

    Time frame: ~1 year. Women with negative or biopsy benign findings at baseline (study entry) were followed for 1 year to confirm the negative status at 1-year follow-up mammography exam. Women diagnosed with cancer were not followed up.

    The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Siemens' processing algorithm to Lorad's processing algorithm with regards to readers' diagnostic accuracy in detecting and characterizing breast lesions. The non-inferiority analyses were performed by comparing the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the two algorithms & to compare false positive marks per subject.

    The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. It shows in a graphical way the trade-off between clinical sensitivity and specificity for every possible cut-off for a test, and gives an idea about the benefit of using the test in question. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the reader assessments.

    A breast-based analysis was used for the primary AUC comparison in order to obtain additional power by having more normal/benign breasts.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Siemens Medical Solutions USA - CSG

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-center Feature Analysis Study to Compare the Diagnostic Accuracy of Siemens' Image Processing (SIP) Algorithms With Lorad's Image Processing (LIP) Algorithms in Detecting and Characterizing Breast Lesions

Acronym: LIP2SIP

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2009
First posted
Sep 22, 2008
Registry last updated
Dec 7, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.