Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04488497

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Arthritis:

One of the greatest success stories in rheumatology - the achievement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission - is tempered by the fact that individuals with RA are dramatically under evaluated and under treated to reduce the risk for heart attacks and strokes. This project will build the foundation for an intervention that will test the hypothesis that the patient-centered intervention tailored to patients with RA to improve hyperlipidemia screening and treatment, thereby decreasing the risk for heart attacks and strokes.

The aims of this proposal are:

Aim 1: To identify patient and physician barriers to lower the risk for heart attacks and strokes in patients with RA.

Aim 2: To develop an intervention designed to optimize lipid screening and management in RA patients. This will consist of patient education and a decision support program to facilitate screening for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol level) or initiation of medications to lower cholesterol (primary outcome) and self-efficacy (level of confidence in performing a task) in taking medications to lower cholesterol secondary outcome).

Aim 3: To pilot test the efficacy and feasibility of intervention developed in Aim 2. The investigators will apply methods related to clinical trials to test the feasibility of the newly developed intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have RA
  • Age between 40 and 75 years (inclusive)
  • Provide a date of their next appointment with their rheumatologist or other physician on their care team
  • Willing to work with a peer coach
  • Speaks English
  • Have a phone
  • Has access to the internet
  • Resides or lives in the US

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not have rheumatoid arthritis
  • Younger than age 40 or older than age 75
  • Taking a statin
  • No known history of diabetes
  • No known history of CVD defined by:
  • Open heart surgery
  • Coronary angioplasty
  • History of heart failure
  • History of heart attack or stroke

Treatment and study plan

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Behavioral

This intervention will help people with RA get tested for hyperlipidemia so that they can later discuss with their physician how to better treat their increased risk for cardiovascular disease.

Standard of Care

Behavioral

Participants in this group will not receive peer coaches calls. They will receive additional educational materials about CVD risk and the regular care provided by their doctors.

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Lipids Checked (Available Now Through National Laboratory Chain) or That Reported Having Their Lipids Checked by Their 1-week or 3-month Visit.

    Time frame: 3 months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    Self-reported

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in General Self-Efficacy (GSF) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The scale consists of 10 items and each item score ranges from 1 ("not at all true") to 4 ("exactly true"). Values 2 and 3 are assigned "barely true" and "moderately true", respectively. Scores are summed across the 10 items to give a total score, with a possible range of 10-40. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in generalized self-efficacy. Scores above 30 indicate high generalized self-efficacy, and scores 30 or below indicate low to moderate generalized self-efficacy.

    To find the change in GSF score from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

  2. Change in Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The scale consists of 13 items and each item score ranges from 0 ("not applicable") to 4 ("agree strongly"). Values 1, 2, and 3 are assigned "disagree strongly", "disagree", and "agree", respectively. Scores are summed across the 13 items to give a total score, with a range of 0-52. The mean score is then transformed into a standardized activation score ranging from 0-100, (the PAM score), based on a conversion table provided by the developer of the scale. Score ranges correspond to levels of activation, with higher levels indicating more activation: Level 1 - score of 47.0 or lower, Level 2 - score between 47.1 to 55.1, Level 3 - score between 55.2 to 72.4, Level 4 - score 72.5 or above.

    To find the change in PAM score from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

  3. Change in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The scale consists of 12 score-able items. The scores from item 1 through 10, 11, and 12 are summed with a range of 0-30 and this is the RAPID3 cumulative score. A final conversion table is used to simplify the score. A score between 0-1.0 is defined as near remission (NR); 1.3-2.0 is low severity (LS); 2.3-4.0 is moderate severity (MS); and 4.3-10.0 is high severity (HS).

    To find the change in RAPID3 score from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

  4. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The scale consists of 8 items, and each item score ranges from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Scores are summed across the 8 items. The lowest possible score is 0 and the highest possible is 24. A score of 10 or greater is considered major depression and 20 or more is severe major depression.

    To find the change in PHQ-8 score from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

  5. Change in MOS Social Support Survey Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The survey consists of 4 separate social support sub-scales and an overall functional social support index for a total of 19 items. To obtain an overall support index score, the average is calculated for both the first 18 items in the scale and the last item in the scale from a range of 1-5. Scale scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale using a formula. A higher score indicates more support. The average score for the overall support index is 70, so individuals scoring above 70 are categorized as having high support and individuals scoring 70 or lower are categorized as having low to moderate support.

    To find the change in social support survey score from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

  6. Change in Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale (MUSE) Score From Baseline to the End of the Study Between Arms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3-months post-intervention, approximately 20 weeks

    The scale consists of 8 items. Possible scores for overall MUSE range from 8-32. A higher overall MUSE score indicates a higher level of self-efficacy in understanding and using prescription medications. The average overall MUSE score is 30, so individuals scoring above 30 are categorized as having high medication understanding and use self-efficacy and individuals scoring 30 or lower are categorized as having low to moderate medication understanding and use self-efficacy.

    To find the change in MUSE scale scoring from baseline to the end of the study between arms, the median of each participant's change in score was calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

Registry information

Official study title

Optimization of Hyperlipidemia Management Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Patient-centered Intervention Development

Acronym: CARE RA

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 28, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.