Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07338500

Cardiovascular Effects of Music Versus Guided Mindfulness

The purpose of this study is to examine how listening to music compares to guided mindfulness in affecting blood pressure, heart rate, and feelings of anxiety in healthy adults. The investigators aim to determine whether one of these approaches is more effective in reducing these variables. Additionally, the study will explore whether personal traits or preferences, measured using questionnaires, influence how participants respond to music or mindfulness. Based on previous clinical findings, the researchers hypothesize that listening to music will lead to greater reductions in blood pressure and heart rate compared to guided mindfulness.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Elizabeth Misener, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

6138127874

Kyle Greenway, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sara de la Salle, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

About this study

Music and mindfulness-based practices, such as meditation and breathing exercises, are well-established non-pharmacological interventions known to positively influence both physiological and psychological health. They are utilized for their ability to reduce stress and promote relaxation by modulating autonomic nervous system activity, which in turn influences the cardiovascular system. This modulation has been associated with reductions in markers of physiological stress, such as blood pressure and heart rate.

Cardiovascular influences of music and mindfulness have been leveraged in numerous medical procedures for enhancing comfort and tolerability, as well as mental well-being. However, despite the widespread use and documented physiological effects of music and mindfulness-based interventions, there is a lack of research directly comparing their effects. Furthermore, there is a relative lack of high-quality randomized trials examining the effects of music and mindfulness on parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate.

This randomized crossover study will examine the cardiovascular impact of listening to a curated music playlist versus participating in a guided mindfulness session in a healthy population to determine whether music produces greater reductions in blood pressure and heart rate than guided mindfulness.

Each participant will attend a single 3-hour study visit, during which they will take part in two sessions. One session involves listening to a carefully selected music playlist, and the other involves participating in a guided mindfulness exercise. The order of the sessions will be random. Blood pressure and heart rate will be measured throughout the study visit, and participants will be asked to complete questionnaires measuring anxiety, experience with music and mindfulness, tendency to become deeply engaged, and enjoyment of each session.

The primary aim is to compare changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate between curated music playlist and guided mindfulness interventions, using an automated oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor with measurements taken at 10-minute intervals.

By investigating the physiological effects of music versus guided mindfulness on hemodynamic responses in a healthy population, this study will provide critical insight into the distinct and shared autonomic effects of these two non-pharmacological interventions. Understanding the cardiovascular effects of music and guided mindfulness will inform evidence-based guidelines for integrating these interventions into clinical and research protocols. As non-invasive therapeutic tools, both music and mindfulness hold promise for enhancing patient care across diverse settings.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Normal baseline blood pressure (systolic BP < 120 mmHg and diastolic BP < 80mmHg).
  • Abstention from caffeine intake for at least 12 hours before the study session and throughout the session, as caffeine may influence cardiovascular measurements.
  • Abstention from using nicotine or tobacco products for at least 1 hour before the study session and throughout the session, as these substances may influence cardiovascular measurements.

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant hearing impairments that cannot be improved with hearing aids or sound amplification.
  • Current use of medications that could affect blood pressure.
  • History of hypertension or cardiovascular disease.
  • Diagnosis of active substance use disorder, or reported patterns of alcohol, cannabis, or recreational/non-prescribed substance use likely to affect cardiovascular function.

Treatment and study plan

Music

Other

Participants will listen to a 40-minute playlist, curated by the research team, through noise-cancelling headphones. The playlist will simultaneously be played in the room through speakers.

Mindfulness

Other

Participants will engage in a structured mindfulness session led by a member of the research team with experience in mindfulness-based practices.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Blood Pressure

    Time frame: 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes during each 40-minute intervention session.

    The investigators will compare changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the curated music playlist and guided mindfulness interventions using an automated oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor with measurements taken at 10-minute intervals.

  2. Changes in Heart Rate

    Time frame: 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes during each 40-minute intervention session.

    The investigators will compare changes in heart rate between the curated music playlist and guided mindfulness interventions using an automated oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor with measurements taken at 10-minute intervals.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure (Finapres NOVA)

    Time frame: 0 to 40 minutes during each 40-minute intervention session.

    Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure will be recorded using Finometer Model 2 hemodynamic monitoring technology (Finapres Medical Systems, Netherlands) to allow for more detailed characterization of the cardiovascular response to music and mindfulness, potentially capturing effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure not detected by periodic arm-cuff measurements.

  2. Changes in Heart Rate (Finapres NOVA, Electrocardiogram-derived)

    Time frame: 0 to 40 minutes during each 40-minute intervention session.

    Heart rate will be recorded continuously using the electrocardiogram (ECG) channel of the Finapres NOVA, a non-invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring technology (Finapres Medical Systems, Netherlands). Heart rate values will be derived from the ECG signal. This will allow for more detailed characterization of the cardiovascular response to music and mindfulness, potentially capturing effects on heart rate not detected by periodic arm-cuff measurements.

  3. Change from Baseline in STAI-Y 1

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after each of the two 40-minute intervention sessions during the single study visit.

    The investigators will measure changes in acute anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI) - State subscale (form Y1) before and after each intervention. The STAI consists of 20 participant-rated statements, from 1 to 4 (1= Not at all, 4= Very much so) regarding their current anxiety (state). A lower score corresponds to less severity of symptoms.

  4. Change from Baseline in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after each of the two 40-minute intervention sessions during the single study visit.

    The investigators will measure changes in common symptoms using the ESAS before and after each intervention. The ESAS consists of 10 common symptoms: pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, well-being, and other, rated from 0 to 10. A lower score corresponds to less severity of symptoms.

  5. Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ) is a validated 20-item questionnaire used to assess individual differences in the rewarding aspects of music listening. Each item is a statement rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "Completely Disagree" to 5 = "Completely Agree"). Higher scores indicate a greater sensitivity to music-related reward. The total and subscale scores will be used to determine whether the extent of music reward experienced by participants predicts the magnitude of cardiovascular impact.

  6. MUSE questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline

    The MUSE questionnaire includes two quantitative items assessing average weekly and daily hours of music listening, as well as three 5-point Likert scale items evaluating the subjective importance of music, frequency of listening, and preference for specific genres. It will be used to characterize participants' music listening habits and attitudes and their relationship to cardiovascular outcomes.

  7. Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Mindfulness Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) is designed to measure the quantity and quality of an individual's mindfulness practice. It includes two quantitative items assessing frequency of formal practice and average duration of each session, as well as ten 5-point Likert scale items evaluating quality of mindfulness practice and time spent being mindful in everyday life, outside of formal sessions. It will be used to evaluate participants' experience with mindfulness and its relationship to cardiovascular outcomes.

  8. Modified Tellegen Absorption Scale (MODTAS)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Modified Tellegen Absorption Scale (MODTAS) is a validated 34-item questionnaire designed to measure an individual's engagement or immersion in sensory or imaginative experiences. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. It will be used to explore whether individual differences in trait absorption predict responsiveness to music and mindfulness interventions.

  9. Subjective Enjoyment (Visual Analogue Scale and Open-Ended Questions)

    Time frame: Immediately after each of the two 40-minute intervention sessions during the single study visit.

    The investigators will assess subjective enjoyment of each intervention using 10-point visual analogue scales (VAS) administered immediately following each session. Participants will rate their enjoyment on a horizontal scale ranging from 0 ("not at all enjoyable") to 10 ("extremely enjoyable"). Additionally, participants will be asked a series of open-ended questions about their experience of each intervention. Including these measures will allow for assessment of potential preference effects that could influence cardiovascular outcomes.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Elizabeth Misener, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

6138127874

Sara de la Salle, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cardiovascular Effects of Music Versus Guided Mindfulness: A Randomized Crossover Study

Acronym: CMM

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.