Erie County Medical Center
Buffalo, New York, 14215, United States
NCT Number: NCT00657241
14-week single blind, double baseline, forced-titration, cross-over comparison of the cardiac benefits of Coreg CR compared to valsartan added to existing ACE inhibition
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Buffalo, New York, 14215, United States
Combination drug therapy is necessary for optimal blood pressure reduction and current guidelines mandate the concomitant use of ACE inhibitors and β-blockers in most patients at significant risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. There is also continuing interest in combining angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) with ACE inhibitors in hypertension based on the unsubstantiated belief that "more complete" renin-angiotensin system inhibition is desirable. It is more attractive physiologically to combine a long-acting β-blocker with vasodilatory actions (carvedilol CR) with an ACE inhibitor because this combination addresses more directly the two fundamental hemodynamic changes needed to reduce CVD events: lowering systolic BP (afterload) and lowering heart rate; the product of the two is a reliable surrogate for reduced cardiac work. In fact, clinical trial data suggest that there is no appreciable additional BP lowering when ARBs are added to ACE inhibitors and neither class lowers heart rate. The present proposal is designed to demonstrate the superior "cardioprotection" of carvedilol CR compared to ARB (valsartan) when each is added to background ACE inhibitor therapy. Principal dependent variables include ambulatory cardiac work (24-hour mean ambulatory systolic BP x heart rate) and laboratory stress responses (central systolic time-tension indices derived from arterial tonometry pre- and post-bicycle exercise). Secondary hemodynamic variables will define changes in flow and pressure (e.g. central systolic BP and forward and reflected pressure wave estimations).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A subject meeting any of the following conditions will be excluded from the study:
Other names: Coreg CR
Other names: Diovan
Time frame: End of each treatment period (4 weeks on ARB or beta-blocker)
Cardiac time-tension index (CTTI) is a refined version of the rate-pressure product (RPP, historically systolic [S] BP x heart rate) reported by the SphygmoCor pulse wave analysis system used in this trial. CTTI is preferable to RPP because the latter overestimates the contribution of systolic BP to cardiac work (the formula intrinsically assumes maximum SBP throughout the entire heart period [RR interval]). In contrast, CTTI represents cardiac work during the actual systolic time interval (STI, the period of active contraction, which is about 320 ms, inversely related to HR). Thus, CTTI = [mean systolic BP during STI, mmHg] x [STI/RR] x [HR, beats/min] and is expressed as "CTTI units" or as "mmHg*beats/min". Mean resting CTTI for SBP 150, HR 60 = about 2500 units (corresponding RPP = 9000 units). In this crossover study, the principal dependent variable is the mean within-subjects difference in supine CTTI between valsartan and carvedilol CR after 4 weeks of each treatment.
Time frame: End of each treatment period (4 weeks on ARB or beta-blocker)
Hemodynamic variable (cardiac rate)
Time frame: End of each treatment period (4 weeks on ARB or beta-blocker)
Hemodynamic variable (volume pumped per heart beat) in mL per beat. Clinically, SV is reported simply as mL
Time frame: End of each 4-week treatment period (valsartan vs. carvedilol CR)
Hemodynamic variable representing whole-body blood flow (the product of heart rate and stroke volume)
Time frame: End of each treatment period (4 weeks of valsartan or carvedilol CR)
Hemodynamic variable measured as mean arterial pressure (mmHg) / cardiac output (L/min) *80 in units of dyne-sec-cm[-5]
Time frame: End of each treatment period (4 weeks of valsartan or carvedilol CR)
Aortic SBP derived non-invasively from radial arterial tonometry, pulse wave analysis, and a generalized transfer function algorithm within the SphygmoCor device. Aortic SBP is different from brachial SBP and is variably lower than brachial SBP due to pulse wave transmission differences between individuals. It is expressed in mmHg.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05610059
Aging, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02439775
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07735468
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Osuna, Sevilla, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00837122
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Accra, Ghana
View Trial Details