Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07159269

Cardiac point-of Care Ultrasound Training Pathway for Emergency Department Advanced Practice Providers

The aim of this study is to assess emergency medicine physician and advanced practice provider (APP) knowledge and technical skill in performance of a point-of-care ultrasound simulation and just-in-time training pathway to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ultrasound training program. By performing this study, we hope to create a standardized training model which could potentially facilitate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical performance and thereby improve patient care.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • advanced practice providers (APPs) currently working in our ED, with additional APPs as they are hired (expected to be about 75 APPs total within the next 3 years due to expanding staffing needs and coverage models).

Exclusion criteria

  • non-APPs such as physicians, nurses, or other clinical staff

Treatment and study plan

Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training and clinical pathway

Behavioral

Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on observed structured clinical skill exam (OSCE) post-training led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, advanced practice providers (APPs) will perform POCUS while supervised by emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians. To assess program feasibility and acceptability, participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview, as well as a knowledge and technical skills assessment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on structured clinical skill exam post-training (OSCE) led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, APPs will perform POCUS while supervised by EM attending physicians. The primary outcome assesses program feasibility and acceptability. Participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview. Survey questions are structured based on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool. This is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5.

  2. Aim 1: Acceptability of the Intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The AIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.

  3. Aim 1: Appropriateness of the Intervention as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The IAM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.

  4. Aim 1: Feasibility of the Intervention as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The FIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aim 1: Feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    Using a modified framework analysis approach, a team of 3-4 trained research assistants and the two emergency ultrasound fellows led by an implementation science expert will deductively analyze semi-structured interview content based on RE-AIM constructs with open inductive coding for data that does not fit into the framework. The investigators will perform a preliminary rapid qualitative deductive analysis based on audio recordings and meeting notes applied to the RE-AIM dimensions, to determine scope and saturation. Coding and categorization will be conducted with RE-AIM templated coding sheets and transferred to NVivo.

  2. Aim 2: Educational impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    Participants will complete a pre-, post-, and 6-month post-training knowledge assessment and technical skill test to assess the educational impact of the cardiac POCUS program, structured using the Ultrasound Competency Assessment Tool (UCAT), which is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater competency.

  3. Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - number of clinical POCUSs performed

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    To assess the advanced practice provider (APP) training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on the number of clinical POCUS performed in the emergency department pre/post-intervention (from the Butterfly ultrasound archiving system, units in counts/percentages).

  4. Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - image quality

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    To assess APP training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on image quality review scores (determine by two ultrasound experts, Likert scale 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater quality).

  5. Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - diagnostic accuracy

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The investigators will collect data on diagnostic accuracy as compared to radiology studies (from ultrasound expert review, True Positive, True Negative, False Positive, False Negative, or Technically-limited study)

  6. Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - time to initial cardiology consult

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention time to initial cardiology consult (both from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).

  7. Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - emergency department length-of-stay

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention ED length-of-stay (from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).

  8. Aim 2: Impact of the training model on cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site

    The investigators will collect pre/post-intervention POCUS revenue data for cost-effectiveness (from hospital billing data, units in dollars).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abha Singh

CONTACT

[email protected]

919-668-8700

Rebecca G Theophanous, MD, MHSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

919-681-0196

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Duke University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Cardiac Point-of-care Ultrasound Clinical Training Pathway Implementation and Impact Assessment for Advanced Practice Providers in the Emergency Department

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Sep 8, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.