University Clinic of Internal Medicine III
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
NCT Number: NCT03831087
To prove the non-inferiority of TAVR-CMR compared to TAVR-CT to guide TAVR according to clinical efficacy, defined as implantation success based on the VARC-2 criteria.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Study Title: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR-CMR).
Coordinating Prinicpal Investigator: Prof. Bernhard Metzler, University Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Innsbruck Medical University.
Planned Study Period: 2017-2023.
Objective: To investigate, for the first time, the non-inferiority of TAVR-CMR to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (TAVR-CT) regarding efficacy and safety end-points.
Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-centre trial.
Patients (planned): 270 patients.
Diagnosis / Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR based on a local heart-team decision.
Methods: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive a predefined TAVR-CMR protocol or to receive a standard TAVR-CT protocol within two weeks after inclusion.
Main Outcome Measure: Follow-up will be performed at hospital discharge after TAVR and after 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome is device implantation success at discharge. The secondary endpoints are a combined safety endpoint and a combined clinical efficacy endpoint at baseline and at 6 months, as well as a comparison of imaging procedure related variables (see section 5.11.2). Endpoint definitions are based on the updated 2012 VARC-2 consensus document.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CMR protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.
CT protocol for the exact determination of the aortic valve dimensions, valve size and implantation route.
Time frame: 6 months
The primary outcome will be a composite clinical efficacy end-point related to implantation success at hospital discharge, based on the VARC-2 criteria: Absence of procedural mortality AND correct positioning of the prosthetic valve AND intended performance of the prosthetic valve (mean aortic valve gradient < 20mmHg and no valve regurgitation > mild)
Medical University Innsbruck
Other
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography to Guide Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Randomized Multicenter Trial
Acronym: TAVR-CMR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06894550
Altitude, Altitude Sickness
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06211296
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05035277
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06372301
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial Details