Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02956577

Cardiac Function and Microcirculation: Type 2 DIABetes and ECHOcardiographic Changes Over Time

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of micro- and macrovascular changes on the cardiac function in relation to left ventricular function and coronary arteries during one year in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The most frequent heart disease in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is the premature development of coronary atherosclerosis, which often leads to overt ischemic heart disease (IHD). T2DM can lead to both cardiac dysfunction due to IHD or to diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is defined as an impairment of left ventricular (LV) function without overt obstructive coronary vessel disease. Diabetic cardiomyopathy has been associated with microvascular dysfunction, which leads to the inability of the heart to circulate blood effectively. The microvascular atherosclerotic changes are well known in patients with diabetes, such as impaired vision, kidney function and sensibility. The macrovascular atherosclerotic changes such as plaques in the coronary arteries are strongly associated with reduced left ventricular function.

However, the relationship between micro- and macrovascular atherosclerotic changes and the impact on cardiac function is less certain.

Estimation of cardiac function includes: Left Atrial (LA) Strain, LA Strain Rate (SR), LA Emptying Function (LAEF), LV Ejection Fraction (EF), Fractional Shortening (FS), Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), Circumferential Strain (CS) and Radial Strain (RS), Strain Rate (SR), Peak Systolic Strain, Post Systolic Strain, Early mitral filling velocity (E), late mitral filling velocity (A), E/A ratio, Deceleration Time (DCT) of early mitral filling velocity, medial and lateral mitral velocities using tissue doppler (e' , a' and s'), E/e' ratio, Isovolumetric Relaxation Time (IVRT), Isovolumetric Closing Time (IVCT), Ejection Time (ET), Myocardial Performance Index (MPI) and Myocardial Work Index (MWI).

In this study, participants will be consisting of non-diabetic subjects and patients with diabetes type 1 + 2. All of the participants have no history of myocardial infarction, heart failure and current symptoms of cardiac disease.

The study population will undergo following examinations:

  • 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Urine- and blood samples.
  • Measurements of anthropometric data and vital parameters
  • Recording of medical history
  • 2D transthoracic echocardiography
  • Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) with adenosine infusion.
  • Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
  • Free fractional reserve computed tomography (FFR-CT)

The examinations will be repeated at follow-up (however non-diabetic subjects will only have 1 CCTA performed at baseline).

The non-invasive FFR-CT will only be performed once in a subgroup of diabetic patients and non-diabetic subjects from November 2016 until May 2017.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 45 ml/min
  • NYHA I + II

Exclusion criteria

  • 2° or 3° AV-block at baseline
  • Long QT-syndrome at baseline
  • Sinus node dysfunction with long sinus arrest at baseline
  • Angina pectoris at baseline
  • Ejection fraction (EF) < 40% at baseline
  • Atrial fibrillation at baseline
  • Usage of dipyridamol at baseline
  • Aortic stenosis and left ventricle hypertrophia at baseline
  • Aortic insufficiency and left ventricle dilatation at baseline
  • Medication for asthma within the last 4 years prior to baseline
  • Medication for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at baseline
  • Allergy to contrast agent at baseline
  • Significant stenosis in left main (LM) / left anterior descending (LAD) artery at baseline
  • Not feasible to measure or perform coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR)
  • Poor quality of echocardiographic images
  • History of pacemaker
  • History of myocardial infarction (MI)
  • History of heart failure (HF)
  • History of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • History of aortic valve replacement
  • History of atrial fibrillation

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) stratified by Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CAC) in patients with diabetes during one year of follow-up

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate the changes in GLS stratified by CAC during one year of follow-up in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in GLS stratified by Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve (CFVR) in patients with diabetes during one year of follow-up

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate the changes in GLS stratified by CFVR during one year of follow-up in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects

  2. Correlation between biomarkers and GLS stratified by CFVR

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the correlation between biomarkers (C-Reactive Protein, Troponin T, NT-proBNP and Uric Acid) and GLS stratified by CFVR in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic subjects

  3. Correlation between biomarkers and GLS stratified by CAC

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the correlation between biomarkers (C-Reactive Protein, Troponin T, NT-proBNP and Uric Acid) and GLS stratified by CAC in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic subjects

  4. Changes in LV function stratified by CAC

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate LV systolic and diastolic function stratified by CAC in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  5. Changes in LV function stratified by CFVR

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate LV systolic and diastolic function stratified by CFVR in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  6. Changes in LV function stratified by micro- and macrovascular diabetic status

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate changes in LV systolic and diastolic function in relation to albuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetes duration and CAC.

  7. Correlation between CFVR and Free Fractional Reserve -Computed Tomography (FFR-CT)

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate the correlation between CFVR and FFR-CT in a subgroup consisting of diabetic patients and non-diabetic subjects.

  8. Correlation between GLS and FFR-CT

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate the correlation between GLS and non-invasive FFR-CT in a subgroup consisting of diabetic patients and non-diabetic subjects.

  9. Changes in GLS in patients with long-term diabetes and no macrovascular disease

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate the impact of historical varying levels of HbA1c and cholesterols on GLS at baseline in patients with diabetes and no macrovascular disease.

Other outcomes

  1. Relationship between strain values and framerate

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate the changes in strain values dependant of framerate

  2. Relationship between strain values and omitted myocardial segments

    Time frame: baseline, 12 months

    To evaluate the changes in strain values dependant of number of myocardial segments omitted

  3. Correlation between dysglycaemia and Left Ventricle Mass (LVM)

    Time frame: Baseline

    To evaluate the impact of dysglycaemia on LVM in non-diabetic subjects compared to diabetic patients.

  4. Left Ventricle (LV) and Left Atrial (LA) function stratified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate LV and LA systolic and diastolic function in relation to NYHA classification

  5. Changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by CAC during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes

    Time frame: baseline, 60months

    To evaluate the changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by CAC during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  6. Changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by CFVR during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes

    Time frame: baseline, 60months

    To evaluate the changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by CFVR during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  7. Changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by plaque morphology during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes

    Time frame: baseline, 60months

    To evaluate the changes in cardiac systolic and diastolic function stratified by plaque morphology during five years of follow-up in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  8. LA function stratified by CFVR

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate atrial function stratified by CFVR in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetic subjects.

  9. LA function stratified by micro- and macrovascular status

    Time frame: baseline

    To evaluate atrial function in relation to albuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetes duration and CAC.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Svendborg Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Systolic and Diastolic Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Type 2 DIABetes Mellitus: Changes Over Time and Comparison With Cardiac Microcirculation. An ECHOcardiographic Study

Acronym: DIABECHO

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 7, 2016
Registry last updated
Oct 22, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.