Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02221531

Carbetocin Trial: Carbetocin Appropriate Rate Better Equilibrium Between Tonus (TOnus) and CIrculatioN

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency and defined as a blood loss of ≥500ml after vaginal birth and ≥1000ml after caesarean section (CS) and/or the need for blood transfusion within 24 hours after delivery (World Health Organization, Recommendations for the Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage. 2007; Leduc et al., J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009). Since PPH is more common after caesarean deliveries than after vaginal births and the rate of CS is rising over time and will probably continue to rise, the incidence of PPH is expected to increase accordingly.

A meta-analysis has shown that routine administration of an oxytocic agent after caesarean delivery leads to a reduced blood loss and decreases the risk of PPH (Cotter et al., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001). The two most commonly used oxytocic drugs after operative delivery are oxytocin and carbetocin, a synthetic oxytocin-analogue. Carbetocin has the advantage over oxytocin of having a longer half-life and therefore reducing the use of additional uterotonics. Based on the findings of reduced cardiovascular side-effects with a short-infusion as compared to a bolus injection found for oxytocin (Thomas et al., Br J Anaesth, 2007), our study hypothesis is that a slower administration rate of carbetocin minimises the cardiovascular side effects without compromising the uterine tone. Therefore, we aim to investigate a short infusion of carbetocin 100 mcg applied in 100ml sodium chlorid compared to a bolus application in women undergoing primary or secondary caesarean delivery. This prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial will take place at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. We hypothesize uterine contraction not to be inferior (primary efficacy endpoint) and the mean arterial pressure to be higher after a short-infusion than after a bolus administration (primary safety endpoint).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–46 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University Hospital Basel

Basel, 4031, Switzerland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy women
  • singleton pregnancy
  • caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
  • older than 18 years
  • written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • emergency caesarean section
  • secondary caesarean section due to fetal distress
  • comorbidities (cardiovascular, kidney or liver disorder, epilepsy)
  • obstetric diseases (hypertension, (pre-)eclampsia)
  • uterine malformation (including uterine fibroids)
  • bleeding disorder
  • known hypersensitivity to carbetocin or oxytocin
  • fetal malformation

Treatment and study plan

Carbetocin Short-infusion

Drug

Short-infusion of Carbetocin 100 microgram as compared to bolus application of Carbetocin 100 microgram (double dummy method)

Carbetocin Bolus application

Drug

Carbetocin 100 microgram given intravenously as a bolus application over about 15 seconds

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal uterine tone

    Time frame: within the first 5 minutes after cord clamping

    Uterine tone is assessed by the obstetrician on a linear analogue scale from 0 to 100

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: within first five minutes after cord clamping

    mean arterial pressure is measured by a non-invasive blood pressure cuff at the upper arm

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Other

Collaborators

  • Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association United Kingdom

Registry information

Official study title

Double-blind Randomised Non-inferiority Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Carbetocin After Caesarean Section Applied as Iv-bolus as Compared to a Short-infusion

Acronym: CARBETOCIN

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Aug 20, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.