NCT Number: NCT00275769
CAPTURE - Complete Automatic Pacing Threshold Utilization Recorded by EnPulse
This study compares the pacemaker's automatic pacing threshold measurements to the manual measurements conducted by a health care provider.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
About this study
The purpose(s) of the study is (are) to evaluate several features available in EnPulse Series pacemaker and report the long term benefit of Atrial Capture Management (ACM) and Ventricular Capture Management (VCM) as demonstrated by accuracy in comparison with manual measurements and variability of ACM and VCM thresholds.
In addition, an evaluation of the timesaving and qualitative benefits of the device feature known as Quick Look II (the computer interface screen of the device programmer) will be measured through the use of a questionnaire completed by the health care professionals involved in patient follow-up care.
This is a one-to-one randomized, multicenter, prospective study in which patients receiving new EnPulse pacemaker implants will be randomized to each of three study arms, 1) routine manual follow-up and follow-up using the automatic features; 2) ACM diagnostics detail on or VCM diagnostics detail on; 3) PMOP on / off or PMOP off / on (6 month cycle).
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients that meet ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 class I or II dual chamber pacing indications (intended for a Pacing Mode programmed to DDD or DDDR)
Exclusion criteria
- Patient with mechanical tricuspid heart valves
- Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required by the protocol or limit study participation
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
The automatic device features Atrial Capture Management and Ventricular Capture Management measure pacing thresholds and is compared to manual pacing thresholds observed at the 6 month follow-up visit
Secondary outcomes
-
Observe the variability of multiple pacing thresholds measured with ACM and VCM
-
Observe visit time differences using automatic measurements versus traditional follow-up
-
Observe the effects of Post Mode Switch Overdrive Pacing (PMOP) on AT/AF burden.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Industry
Collaborators
- Medtronic
Registry information
Official study title
Complete Automatic Pacing Threshold Utilization Recorded by EnPulse
Important dates
- Study start
- 2004
- Primary completion
- 2006
- Study completion
- 2006
- First posted
- Jan 12, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Dec 11, 2008
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Model 4965 Post-Approval Study
NCT01076348
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsMEDTRONIC ADAPTA, VERSA AND SENSIA nEw3 POST APPROVAL STUDY
NCT01076374
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsReducing Episodes by Septal Pacing Efficacy Confirmation Trial (RESPECT)
NCT00289289
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsPREFER (Pacemaker Remote Follow-Up Evaluation and Review)
NCT00294645
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details