NCT Number: NCT02700815
Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain
This randomised, controlled multi-centre parallel group trial will assess the efficacy and tolerability of a topical formulation gel of the combination of diclofenac and capsaicin in comparison to gels with diclofenac alone, capsaicin alone, and placebo for the treatment of acute back pain or neck pain
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Signed and dated written informed consent at Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local legislation
- Male or female patients >=18 years with current diagnosis of acute back pain or of neck pain for at least 24 hours, but less than 21 days
- Acute back pain or acute neck pain resulting in pain on movement (POM) >= 50 mm (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100) for at least one POM procedure out of 5 standardized procedures.
- Sensitivity to algometric pressure on the painful trigger point <= 25 N/cm2
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control
Exclusion criteria
- History of 3 or more episodes of back or neck pain in the last 6 months excluding the current episode
- Surgery due to back or neck pain or rehabilitation due to back or neck pain in the last 12 months
- Back or neck pain that is attributable to any specific identifiable cause (e.g. disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, osteomalacia, inflammatory arthritis, metabolic, neurological diseases or tumour)
- Trauma or strains of the back or neck muscles within the last 3 months
- Prior use within the last 3 days before Visit 1 or concomitant use of any anti-inflammatory drugs, heparinoids, muscle relaxants or analgesics. Long-acting glucocorticoids must have been discontinued 10 days before study entry. Spinal injections should have been discontinued in due time (investigator's judgement) before patient enrolment to allow complete wash-out of the active ingredient based on investigator's judgment
- Non-pharmacological treatment (physiotherapy, heat treatment (e.g. heat patch, hot water bottle), or massage, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) or locally applied pharmacological product to the back or neck area 24 hours prior study entry and during the study period
- Known severe hepatocellular insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency or Gilbert's syndrome (Morbus Meulengracht)
- Any other medical condition that would interfere with efficacy and safety assessments based on investigator's judgement or any on-going clinical condition that would jeopardize patient's or site personnel's safety or study compliance based on investigator judgement.
- Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to the active ingredients or any excipient(s).
- Patients in whom attacks of asthma, bronchospasm, rhinitis or urticaria were precipitated by the intake of Acetyl salicylic acid (ASS) or other NSAIDs
- Irritated skin (based on investigator's judgement), skin wounds, eczema or open injuries at application site
- Negative experience in the past with heat treatments for muscle complaints
- Patient not able to understand and comply with trial requirements based on investigators judgement
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Participation in a clinical trial within the previous 30 days or simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
- Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial
Treatment and study plan
Capsaicin
DrugPlacebo
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application
Time frame: Baseline and Day 2
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 centimeters (cm) wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in cm.
Secondary outcomes
-
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h))
Time frame: 0 to 72 hours after start of treatment
This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 72 h that is for first three treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-72 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 3 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 4 morning) - it is not meant here as a pharmacokinetics (PK) parameter (concentration over time).
-
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h))
Time frame: 0 to 120 hours after start of treatment
This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 120 h that is for first five treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-120 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 5 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 6 morning) - it is not meant here as a PK parameter (concentration over time).
-
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and day 2
This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 30% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening.
-
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and day 2
This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 50% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening.
-
Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning
Time frame: Baseline and Day 6
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 cm wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in centimeters (cm).
-
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 2 Evening, Before Drug Application
Time frame: Baseline and Day 2
PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA.
-
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 6 Morning
Time frame: Baseline and Day 6
PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomized, Controlled Multi-centre Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of a Topically Applied Combination Containing Diclofenac 2% + Capsaicin 0.075% (2 g Formulation Per Application; 2-times Daily for 5 Days) Compared to Placebo, as Well as to Diclofenac 2% and Capsaicin 0.075% in Patients With Acute Back or Neck Pain
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Mar 7, 2016
- Registry last updated
- May 6, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Intravenous Tramadol for Positioning of Femur Fracture Patients Before Spinal Anaesthesia
NCT07735884
Acute Pain, Femoral Fractures
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsDoes Patient Testimonial Improve the Pain Relief Derived From a Brief Intervention
NCT07335159
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsAnalgesic Equivalence of NSAIDs and Tramadol in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Minimally Invasive Surgery
NCT07500454
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsIntranasal Ketamine Versus Subcutaneous Ketamine for Treatment of Post-traumatic Acute Pain in the Emergency Department ( INVESCK )
NCT05229055
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Monastir, Tunisia
View Trial Details