The BRAINS Lab at Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4301, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06430580
The goal of this study is to test the impact of two drugs that produce temporary stress-like symptoms, both in isolation and together, on cannabis use motivation in individuals with Cannabis Use Disorder. The main questions it will answer are:
1. How do different forms of stress affect cannabis use motivation? 2. How do different forms of stress affect the body's natural cannabinoids?
Researchers will compare a placebo to both drugs in isolation, as well as together, across four separate lab visits.
Participants will:
1) Complete a clinical screening interview (by phone or in-person) and visit the lab for a medical screening, and if eligible:
a) Visit the lab four times where they will: i). Take one of four drug combinations ii). Complete an interview, questionnaires, and computerized tasks iii). Have their brain activity recorded with an EEG cap iv). Provide three blood samples
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Early Phase 1
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4301, United States
Location status: Recruiting
The prevalence of daily cannabis use and cannabis use disorder (CUD) has increased in the United States over the past two decades. Unfortunately, psychosocial treatments produce minimal long-term abstinence rates and no FDA-approved medications for CUD exist. Thus, identifying novel CUD treatment targets is an increasingly urgent public health need.
Stress-elicited cannabis use motivation has been implicated in worse CUD outcomes, but a mechanistic understanding of how acute stress increases cannabis use motivation in CUD is limited. Prior work has demonstrated that acute psychosocial stress enhancement of subsequent cannabis cue incentive salience, as indexed by the late positive potential (neural measure of approach-motivated attention recorded using electroencephalography [EEG]), was associated with worse CUD severity and intervention response, independent of subjective craving. Moreover, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal [HPA]-axis, rather than noradrenergic or subjective reactivity to the psychosocial stressor was associated with subsequent potentiation of the cannabis cue-elicited late positive potential. These studies suggest that non-genomic, rapid glucocorticoid effects may be a contributing mechanism in stress amplification of neural drug-cue reactivity, but their correlational designs preclude causal inference. Further, psychosocial stressors are unable to isolate HPA-axis vs. noradrenergic components of stress reactivity.
To isolate HPA-axis activation and test causality, pharmacological manipulations, common in animal models but rare in human studies, will be used to produce separate and co-operative glucocorticoid (20mg hydrocortisone) and noradrenergic (54mg yohimbine) activation. The investigators will employ a 2x2 randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind crossover design in 36 participants with severe CUD. The primary aim is to test the causal potentiating effect of glucocorticoids on drug-cue reactivity and drug use motivation, and further determine if the effect depends on co-occurring noradrenergic stimulation. Preclinical work indicates that glucocorticoids can potentiate reward motivation via mobilization of endocannabinoid activity (primary target of cannabis). Thus, as an exploratory aim, the investigators will obtain plasma samples to test the impact of pharmacological stress on circulating endocannabinoids (2-AG, AEA) and their mediating role in glucocorticoid potentiation of drug-cue reactivity and drug use motivation. This project represents a highly novel integration of a rigorous pharmacological challenge design with biological markers of drug-cue incentive salience and endocannabinoid system activity. If hypotheses are confirmed, one causal mechanism through which stress increases neural cannabis cue reactivity will be known, which has immediate implications for testing experimental therapeutics. The long-term goal is to understand how a stress-related mechanism predictive of worse CUD phenotype is generated and can be blocked in CUD. Development of this model will provide a valid, efficient and (relative to other neuroimaging methods) low-cost approach to screen candidate medications and optimize psychosocial drug cue exposure therapies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
. a. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) b. Post-myocardial infarction
20mg hydrocortisone, single oral dose
54mg yohimbine hcl, single oral dose
20mg cornstarch placebo, single oral dose
54mg cornstarch placebo, single oral dose
Time frame: Late positive potential amplitude outcome is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Change in electroencephalography-recorded (EEG) late positive potential amplitude to cannabis cue images after hydrocortisone (with or without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo conditions (higher amplitudes indicate worse outcome)
Time frame: Intensity is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Marijuana purchase task-derived Intensity after hydrocortisone administration (with or without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo (increased Intensity indicates worse outcome)
Time frame: OMax is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Marijuana purchase task-derived OMax after hydrocortisone administration (with or without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo (increased OMax indicates worse outcome)
Time frame: Breakpoint is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Marijuana purchase task-derived Breakpoint after hydrocortisone administration (with or without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo (increased Breakpoint indicates worse outcome)
Time frame: Elasticity is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Marijuana purchase task-derived Elasticity after hydrocortisone administration (with or without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo (decreased Elasticity indicates worse outcome)
Time frame: Implicit choice task # of cannabis image selections outcome is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Change in cannabis image selections on the Implicit Image Choice Task (computerized behavioral task; range 0-30; higher scores indicate worse outcome) after hydrocortisone administration (with and without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo
Time frame: Explicit choice task # of cannabis image selections outcome is assessed at each of the four lab visits, which take place over the study period (10-22 days)
Change in cannabis image selections on the Explicit Image Choice Task (computerized behavioral task; range 0-30; higher scores indicate worse outcome) after hydrocortisone administration (with and without yohimbine) compared to placebo+placebo and yohimbine+placebo
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Florida State University
Other
Acronym: COBRAS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06058702
Cannabis Use Disorder, Mental Disorders
West Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06891235
Cannabis Intoxication, Cannabis Use
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05453513
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07340554
Addiction, Addiction, Substance
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial Details