Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04982029

Cannabidiol on Reward- and Stress-related Neurocognitive Processes in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of cannabidiol on reward- and stress-related neurocognitive processes among individuals with opioid use disorder on buprenorphine or methadone treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) demonstrate reward- and stress-related neurocognitive changes compared to individuals without OUD, including cravings for opioids in response to exposure to triggers, tendency to make impulsive and disadvantageous decisions, and a strong attentional bias towards drug-related cues. Together, these deficits are significant contributors to relapse and discontinuation of treatment. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to impact some of these cognitive deficits but studies of CBD among individuals with OUD are mostly lacking. Therefore, this study aims to answer whether CBD has any impact on reward-related neurocognitive deficits in individuals with OUD. If successful, this line of research will lay the groundwork for future studies to evaluate CBD's impact on OUD treatment outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking
  • DSM5 diagnosis of opioid use disorder
  • Receiving buprenorphine or methadone for treatment of opioid use disorder
  • Agreeable to abstaining from using any cannabis or CBD products for the duration of the trial.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any self-reported use of cannabis or CBD products in the past 30 days
  • Baseline depression (PHQ9) or anxiety (GAD7) scores of greater than 10
  • Currently pregnant
  • Hepatic liver enzymes greater than 3x upper normal limit
  • Hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or sesame oil (CBD solution comes in sesame oil emulsion)
  • Currently taking any medications with known significant pharmacokinetic interactions with CBD

Treatment and study plan

Cannabidiol 100 MG/ML [Epidiolex]

Drug

600mg

Placebo

Drug

Matching placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cue-reactivity

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    The primary outcomes is cue-induced cravings (Opioid Craving Scale). This was measured with a single 10-point likert scale asking about cravings, where 0 represented lower levels of craving and 10 indicated higher levels of cravings. This was given at 3 different time points, pre-cue, post-neutral, and post-drug images. Cue-induced craving is the difference between drug cue and pre-cue scores.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delayed Discount

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    Monetary Choice Questionnaire will be used to calculate impulse decision making. This is a 27-item self-administered questionnaire where participants choose between a smaller, immediate monetary reward and a larger, delayed monetary reward. A participants score is between one of the two endpoints (0.25 or 0.00016). If an individual is more likely to prefer the delayed versus immediate reward, their score is more likely to be closer to the 0.00016 endpoint. Please note the rate of delayed discounting is not the same for each question.

  2. Decision Making

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    Iowa Gambling Task will be used to assess impulsive decision-making. The larger the number, the more "safer" options were chosen. This is measured by taking the total number of "risky" choices and subtracting it from the "less risky" choices. The lower the number, the more "high risky" options were chosen. If participants chose the less risky option, they received a positive point, if individuals picked the riskier choice, they received a negative point. Negative values indicate a participant chose more riskier decisions than less-risky, whereas positive values indicate participants chose the less riskier decision more often. The lowest score an individual could receive is -100 (very risk) to 100 (least risky).

  3. Attentional Bias

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    Visual probe task will be used to assess attentional bias to drug-related cues. Opioid-related and neutral images will be used. Each trial will begin with a fixation point lasting 500ms. A pair of images then will appear on the left and right of the screen for either a short (200ms) or long (500ms) stimulus duration to assess automatic orientating and controlled attention processing, respectively. Image pairs will be replaced by a probe in the location of either the opioid-related or neutral image. The probe will remain until the participant responds to identify the probe orientation by pressing the response keys as quickly as possible. Attentional bias is calculated as the difference in reaction time (RT) between when the probe replaced the neutral compared with the opioid-related images (i.e. RTneutral - RTopioid). Therefore the more positive the number, the less attentional bias toward drug cue, and a negative number represents more attentional bias toward the drug cue.

  4. Stress-reactivity

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    Physiologic and subjective stress will be assessed. Stress-reactivity was measured by participants mirror tracing an image on a compute screen where a loud beeping noise would occur if a participant took too long or went outside the lines. It's measured in ms and the longer someone stayed on the task, the better ability they have to react stress.

  5. Stress-Reactivity (Physiological)

    Time frame: Visit 2 and 3 (at least 1 week apart)

    For this outcome, participants received a salivary cortisol test prior to, immediately after, and 20 minutes after the cue-reactivity paradigm. Lower levels indicate lower levels of salivary cortisol in the sample.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Registry information

Official study title

Cannabidiol on reward-and Stress-related Neurocognitive Processes in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Trial

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 29, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 5, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.