Best Practice
OtherReceive usual blood pressure management
Other names: standard of care, standard therapy
NCT Number: NCT04467021
This phase II trial studies how well intensive blood pressure management works in decreasing systolic blood pressure in patients with kidney or thyroid cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic) who are starting anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor cancer therapy. This study is being done to find out if a systolic blood pressure to a target of less than 120 mmHg (intensive systolic blood pressure management) can be achieved, well tolerated, and beneficial as compared to the usual approach to a target of less than 140 mmHg while taking an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study may help doctors understand the best way to control blood pressure in kidney or thyroid cancer patients taking anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Siteman Cancer Center at West County Hospital, Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine the feasibility of an intensive (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 120 mmHg) "Intervention" versus standard care (SBP < 140 mmHg) "Non-Intervention" approach to blood pressure (BP) control in metastatic renal cell and thyroid cancer patients initiating anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive intensive systolic blood pressure management for 6 months. Patients receive increased blood pressure medication every 2 weeks while systolic blood pressure is 120 mmHg or higher. Patients also monitor blood pressure at home 1 day a week (4 times in 1 day) every 2 weeks and upload the recorded blood pressure readings to the provider and to a central blood pressure monitoring team. Patients with changes in blood pressure medications monitor blood pressure readings on 3 days in 1 week (4 times in 1 day).
ARM B: Patients receive standard blood pressure management for 6 months. Patients receive blood pressure medications per doctor's instruction. Patients also monitor blood pressure at home 1 day (4 times in 1 day) every 2 weeks and upload the recorded blood pressures to a central monitoring team.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Receive usual blood pressure management
Other names: standard of care, standard therapy
Undergo blood pressure measurement
Undergo intensive systolic BP management
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Differences in SBP over the 6- month study period between intensive BP control (intervention) versus standard care (non-intervention group) will be compared using the "difference-indifference" method. All mixed effects models will be estimated using generalized estimating equations (GEE).
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Based on all automated home and office BP measurements.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will compare the study retention rates between the intensive SBP versus standard care group, by constructing appropriate mixed-effect generalized linear models (e.g. a mixed effect log-linear model for fatigue and a logistic model for study retention) and using GEE for model estimation
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The frequency of orthostatic hypotension as defined by > 20 mmHg decreases in office SBP with standing; or symptomatic hypotension, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria, in participants in the intervention and non-intervention group arms.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will compare the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue between the intensive SBP versus standardlcCare group, by constructing appropriate mixed-effect generalized linear models (e.g. a mixed effect log-linear model for fatigue and a logistic model for study retention) and using GEE for model estimation.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will compare the medication compliance between the intensive SBP versus standard care group, by constructing appropriate mixed-effect generalized linear models (e.g. a mixed effect log-linear model for fatigue and a logistic model for study retention) and using GEE for model estimation.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The participant satisfaction with BP care (including the C-BAC and the related technologies) and BP medications will be evaluated through questionnaires evaluated on a Likert scale and via open ended discussions with focus groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The provider satisfaction with BP care (including the C-BAC and the related technologies) and BP medications will be evaluated through questionnaires evaluated on a Likert scale and via open ended discussions with focus groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will determine the rates of adverse cardiovascular events in each group. These include the incidence of significant CV events including stroke, acute coronary syndrome/myocardial infarction or hospitalization for heart failure; the suspension of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy due to toxicity; or all-cause death.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
Cancer Therapy Risk-Reduction With Intensive Systolic BP Management (CARISMA) - a Phase II Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06720857
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Disorder
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05705531
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Disorder
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00652717
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Disorder
View Trial Details