Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03961685

Cancer Activity and Lifestyle Measurement Study

The CALM Study is an observational study to investigate the associations of linoleic acid levels in the blood, diet, activity, and lifestyle factors with measures of muscle strength, muscle function and overall outcomes for postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline chemotherapy.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

The Ohio State University Clinical Research Center (Davis Medical Research Center)

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

About this study

The CALM Study is a prospective study to determine the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on cardiolipin profiles in relationship to cardiac and skeletal muscle function in breast cancer patients before and after 1 cycle of anthracycline therapy. Patients will undergo blood sampling and imaging of the heart and skeletal muscle at two Clinical Visits. The two visits, Baseline and study completion (Post-1 cycle anthracycline) will occur approximately ~4 weeks apart.

The driving hypothesis is that anthracycline reduces linoleic acid-rich cardiolipin with associated decline of cardiac and skeletal muscle measures. By coupling cardiac and skeletal muscle changes with cardiolipin markers reflective of dietary linoleic acid, this work will advance inexpensive and highly accessible therapies to preserve functional capacity and diminish adverse outcomes in cancer patients. Breast cancer patients (stages I-III) receiving anthracycline will be prospectively evaluated to achieve the following aims:

Aim 1: Measure the baseline relationships between cardiolipin status and magnetic resonance-based measures of cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology in breast cancer patients. Hypothesis 1a: Higher cardiolipin is related to better cardiac structure and function. Hypothesis 1b: Higher cardiolipin is associated with higher skeletal muscle mass and mitochondrial capacity in women with breast cancer prior to starting anthracycline therapy. Hypothesis 1c: Dietary linoleic acid modifies the relationships between cardiolipin and cardiac or skeletal muscle measures.

Aim 2: Assess chemotherapy-induced changes in cardiolipin composition, cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology. Hypothesis 2a: Change in skeletal muscle function and cardiac function together better predict worse functional capacity after completion of a course of anthracycline therapy for breast cancer compared to change of either skeletal or cardiac function alone. Hypothesis 2b: Cardiolipin levels decrease significantly from baseline in women who have completed one cycle of anthracycline therapy for breast cancer. Hypothesis 2c: Dietary linoleic acid modifies the effects of anthracycline on cardiolipin and cardiac or skeletal muscle physiology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of stage I-II breast cancer, adjuvant or neoadjuvant anthracycline therapy

Exclusion criteria

  • current smoker, under medical supervision for any other type of cancer, prior history of malignancies, infection requiring antibiotics in the last 3 months, diagnosis of hear disease or previous heart attach, stroke, or heart surgery, pacemaker or defibrillator, cardiac edema, autoimmune or inflammatory disease, current use of hormone replacement therapy, liver diseases, kidney diseases or failure, digestive diseases, pulmonary diseases or edema, diabetes, severe claustrophobia and/or metal implants preventing MRI measurement, orthopedic diagnoses prevent mobility, mitochondrial diseases, any other condition that would impede or be contraindicated for study assessments

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks)

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measurement of Cardiac Functions using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

  2. Change in Skeletal Muscle 31Phosphorous Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (P-MRS) from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measurement of energy recovery and fat content of the calf muscle

  3. Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Cardiolipin from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measurement of a phospholipid in the mitochondrial membrane of white blood cells

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Habitual and recent dietary intake from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measurement of dietary intake in the past month using Dietary History Questionnaire and recent intake will be measured using 24-hour recall

  2. Change in Physical Activity Questionnaires from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    two questionnaire will be used to measure physical activity and leisure time activity

  3. Change in Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) symptoms from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    BCPT symptoms questionnaire measures symptoms related to breast cancer treatment

  4. Change in Fatigue Questionnaire from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measures fatigue in breast cancer patients

  5. Change in Short form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measures general physical functioning and well-being

  6. Change in Sleep Disturbance Questionnaire from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Assesses sleep quality and sleep-related impairments

  7. Change in Linoleic Acid in the blood from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Linoleic acid levels in the plasma and erythrocytes

  8. Change in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measures body composition (adipose and muscle mass)

  9. Change in MRI liver lipid content from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measurement of Liver Lipid content using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Indirect measure of body composition using weight and height

  2. Change in Omega-3 Intake Checklist from baseline to study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and study completion, an average of 3 weeks

    Measure the amount of omega-3 fatty acid consumed in the diet

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The CALM Study: Cancer Activity and Lifestyle Measurement Study

Acronym: CALM

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 23, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.