Blinded Dry Needling
ProcedureDry needling is performed using anatomical landmarks without ultrasound guidance. Needle placement is then confirmed via ultrasound imaging.
NCT Number: NCT07079033
The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of invasive interventions (dry needling or injection) performed on specific muscles of the hip region in reaching the anatomical target. The accuracy of the interventions performed with a blinded method will be compared with an observational assessment supported by ultrasonography. The interventions will be performed by a physician with clinical experience, and the anatomical location of the needle tip will be evaluated by a second physician with ultrasonography after each procedure. The targeted muscles include the iliacus, pectineus, sartorius, tensor fascia latae, and rectus femoris. Each participant will be subjected to interventions for five different muscles, and a total of at least 40 injection interventions will be analyzed. Ultrasonography will be used only for observation and verification purposes; no pharmacological substances will be applied during the procedure. All procedures will be performed under sterile conditions, and participants will be monitored for 24 hours for possible pain, bruising, or complications. Participants will be informed about the content and purpose of the study, and written informed consent forms will be obtained. The study does not have a therapeutic purpose and is only intended to investigate targeting accuracy. The data to be obtained is expected to contribute to the determination of anatomical accuracy rates in clinical practices and the improvement of interventional training processes.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of muscle targeting when dry needling injections are performed using the blinded (anatomical landmark-based) technique. The accuracy of these injections will be assessed by confirming the needle placement with ultrasonography immediately after each attempt.
According to existing literature, the accuracy of blinded injection techniques is reported to be approximately 67%, while ultrasound-guided injections achieve an accuracy of about 92%. A power analysis was conducted using these proportions to detect a statistically significant difference between the two methods. Based on these values, Cohen's h effect size was calculated as 0.66. With a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 and a statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 74 injection attempts are required.
In this study, each participant will receive injections into five different muscles suspected to be involved in myofascial pain. With 15 participants, this will result in 75 injection attempts, thereby meeting the required sample size for adequate power.
Eligible participants will be adults aged 18-65 presenting with nonspecific hip, groin, or anterior thigh pain and referred for physical therapy. The study particularly focuses on individuals with suspected myofascial pain syndrome in deep or less accessible hip-related muscles, such as the iliacus, pectineus, and sartorius. All participants must be clinically indicated for dry needling or similar interventions and capable of cooperating with the procedure.
Ultrasonographic evaluation will be used only to confirm needle placement, not to guide the injection. This allows for the assessment of the real-world accuracy of the blinded technique, which is commonly used in routine clinical practice. The findings will provide insight into the reliability of this method and help guide training and clinical decision-making in musculoskeletal and pain management practices.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dry needling is performed using anatomical landmarks without ultrasound guidance. Needle placement is then confirmed via ultrasound imaging.
Time frame: Immediately after each injection attempt
Proportion of injection attempts in which the needle accurately reaches the intended target muscle using the blinded (anatomical landmark-based) technique, as confirmed by ultrasonography.
Time frame: Immediately after each injection attempt
Determination of individual accuracy rates for each of the five specific muscles injected using the blinded technique (e.g., iliacus, pectineus, sartorius, etc.), based on ultrasound confirmation.
Time frame: 2 week
Evaluation of variability in injection accuracy among different clinicians performing the blinded technique, based on ultrasound-confirmed needle placements.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Erzurum Regional Training & Research Hospital
Other Gov
Can We Reliably Needle Hip Region Muscles Without Imaging? A Muscle-Specific Accuracy Study Using Ultrasound
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.