Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01875692

Can we Better Understand the Development of VAP and Eventually Predict and Prevent it?

Pathogens of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) come from colonizers of the trachea. The hypothesis of the investigators is that during the first days of intubation, independently of the use of antibiotics, there is a change in the oro-pharyngeal flora leading to the selection of one pathogen in the trachea, that will finally be the cause of VAP.

The investigators designed a prospective study including 300 patients intubated for more than 3 days, with daily analysis of oro-pharyngeal juice and tracheal aspirate by culture and metagenomics, in order to determine if this microbiological surveillance permits:

1. To predict a high risk to develop a VAP in the next 48h and even to predict its agent 2. To better understand the development of VAP by studying the evolution of the "respiratory flora" in the context of intubation

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Hospital

Geneva, Canton of Geneva, 1201, Switzerland

About this study

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY:

The ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is responsible for almost half of infections acquired in intensive care, affecting up to 28% of mechanically ventilated patients with a mortality rate ranging from 25 to 50%. The majority of these VAP originate in the sub-glottic juice that accumulates just above the endotracheal tube cuff. Many preventive measures exist and are applied in this institution, including oropharyngeal aspiration every 4 hours and tracheal aspirates every 8 hours. Currently, these aspirates are simply discarded. However, a French study evaluating the colonization and infection of the respiratory tract of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has highlighted that the causative agent of VAP is selected in more than 2/3 of the cases in tracheal aspirates several days before the VAP. This suggest that "microbiological surveillance" of daily aspirates may permit the identification of a selected respiratory pathogen later responsible of VAP.

Parallel to this, the rapid development of genomics has highlighted the role of flora (microbiota) and its link with disease (eg, colitis and intestinal microbiota inflammatory). This area is also emerging in the field of respiratory tract infections, for example in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. There is no description yet of metagenomics changes in respiratory flora of patients intubated with or without VAP, neither evaluation of the benefits of such an approach in relation to classical microbiology. The investigators believe that studying the respiratory flora of ventilated patients could provide clues to better understand the development of VAP.

METHODOLOGY (plan, inclusion and objectives):

Prospective study of 300 intubated patients recruited during a period of 2 years, in whom tracheal aspirates and oropharyngeal juice collected daily will be analyzed by culture and metagenomics, instead of being simply discarded. The results of these analyzes will be used only for research purposes (culture and metagenomics in parallel).

The main objective is to determine whether daily monitoring of oropharyngeal juice and tracheal aspirates by culture identifies the selection of a pathogen among the colonizing flora, which would be predictive of the onset of VAP in 48-72 hours.

The secondary objectives are to obtain new knowledge on the kinetics of colonization and respiratory infections in intubated patients, compare the advantages and disadvantages of a metagenomic approach compared to culture in this context, and study the influence of antibiotherapy in this context.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient hospitalised in the adult ICU of HUG (>18 years old)
  • Intubated for < 24 hours
  • Expected duration of intubation > 4 days (e.g. neurologic disease)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients for whom regular tracheal aspirations cannot not be performed (because of unstable intracranial pressure, for example).
  • New antibiotic therapy in the week preceding the intubation

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of cases where tracheal (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate clearly showing a selection of the same pathogen retrieved later in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), when VAP happens.

    Time frame: After 18 months

    This will provide the sensitivity of tracheal culture to identify correctly the agent of VAP before VAP happens.

  2. Percentage of case where the pathogen selected in tracheal (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate do not correspond to the agent of VAP as identified by BAL.

    Time frame: After 18 months

    Helps to determine the "specificity" of tracheal aspirates to predict the agent of VAP.

  3. Percentage of cases where despite the selection of only one pathogen in tracheal aspirate (same for oropharyngeal) aspirate, the patient did never suffer from VAP

    Time frame: After 18 months

    Helps determining the positive and negative predictive values of tracheal aspirates to predict VAP.

  4. Presence of Ventilator-Associated-Pneumonia (VAP)

    Time frame: After 18 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of VAP in the study population

    Time frame: After 18 months

  2. Type of bacteria retrieved on intubation day compared to type of bacteria retrieved after 1 week of intubation

    Time frame: After 18 months

    The investigators expect to find normal oropharyngeal flora on intubation day but Gram negative pathogens after one week, despite the absence of antibiotherapy.

    This will be compared with and without antibiotherapy.

  3. Evolution of metagenomics of oropharyngeal - tracheal aspirates in cases (VAP) and control (no VAP)

    Time frame: After 18 months

    For patients suffering from VAP, metagenomics will also be assessed in the BAL. This will give the investigators some clues on the "respiratory flora" equilibrium and its evolution in cases and control

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Geneva

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Culture Versus Genomics: Study of Oropharyngeal and Tracheal Flora in Intubated Patients. Can we Better Understand the Development of Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia (VAP) and Predict Its Causing Pathogen(s)?

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 12, 2013
Registry last updated
Dec 3, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.