Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06584604

Calibration of Esophageal Balloon Catheter in Spontaneous and Mandatory Mechanical Ventilation

Calibration of the esophageal balloon catheter (Pes catheter) is important for the right measurement of the esophageal pressure (Pes) and subsequent interpretation of the derived transpulmonary pressures during mechanical ventilation. Both relative changes and absolute values of Pes can be affected by inappropriate filling of the esophageal balloon and by the elastance of the esophagus wall. Therefore one should calibrate the balloon to determine the best filling pressure. Calibration of the Pes catheter has only been validated in mandatory ventilation but not in support modes in which the patient triggers the ventilator and is supported by the mechanical ventilator. Because the forces in the thoracic cage behave differently in comparison with a controlled mode, it is to be expected that the calibration process in a support mode yields different filling volumes in comparison with the calibration process in a controlled mode. This would lead to a more reliable filling volume in support mechanical ventilation and a more reliable derivation of transpulmonary pressure and therefore to a better treatment of patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2333ZA, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Willem Snoep, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31715262164

About this study

In mechanical ventilation the esophageal pressure (Pes) is used to calculate the transpulmonary pressure (PL). The transpulmonary pressure is used to set the positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the inspiratory pressure. In spontaneous mechanical ventilation the transpulmonary pressure swing (which is the difference between the maximum and minimum transpulmonary pressure) is used as a measure of patient effort. Too much patient effort is perhaps detrimental in patients with early, severe ARDS, leading to additional lung damage and possibly a prolonged ICU stay.

The Pes is measured using a separate or integrated (feeding tube and Pes catheter) esophageal balloon catheter. The catheter is placed in the right position and has to be inflated to produce a readable pressure signal. The Pes balloon needs calibration before measurement to be sure that the readings are trustworthy. When calibrating one should take the compliance of the esophagus into account, together with the calibration curve, and with that, the filling volume of the patient changes from patient to patient. A calibration study of the Pes catheter has only been performed in passive mechanically ventilated patients, i.e. in patients without any breathing efforts.

In spontaneous breathing patients who still needs support from the ventilator, the forces within the thorax differ considerably in comparison with passive patients. When initiating a breath the diaphragm of the patient will move downwards and the Pes will become negative. In passive patient the ventilator initiates the breath and the diaphragm will be pushed downwards but the Pes will become more positive. It is probable that the calibration methods used in passive patients is not feasible in patients who exhibit a breathing effort. It is therefore necessary to study the calibration of the esophageal balloon catheter in patients that breath spontaneously with the support of a mechanical ventilator.

The hypothesis is that the calibration method, and therefore the filling pressure of the balloon is different from the values when the patient would be ventilated in a passive mode. Wrong calibration leads to wrong values, which could possibly lead to wrong interpretation of the obtained values with possible harm for the patient.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older.
  • Mechanically ventilated in spontaneous mode.
  • Sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) between -3 and -5).
  • Pes catheter in situ according to the protocol used in the LUMC (Insertion of a Pes catheter is mandatory if it is suspected that te patient will be ventilated for more than 24 hrs.).

Exclusion criteria

  • Medical condition that excludes the placement of a Pes catheter.
  • Allergic reaction against rocuronium in the past.
  • Pregnant.
  • RASS > -3

Treatment and study plan

There is no intervention

Other

There is no intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Esophageal pressures (in cmH2O) measured by the balloon catheter at different filling volumes (in ml)

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    To obtain a calibration method for the oesophageal balloon catheter in patients ventilated with a support mode and breathing spontaneously. Two, often used balloon catheters will be tested.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The difference of optimal filling volume in spontaneously breathing and in passive ventilation (in cmH2O)

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    After measurements of the esophageal balloon were done during spontaneously breathing patients, measurements were done during mandatory ventilation while patient is passive. The measurements are the values and the optimal filling volume of the esophageal balloon in spontaneously breathing and in a passive mode.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abraham Schoe, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Willem Snoep, BSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 (0)71-5262164

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Hamilton Medical AG

Registry information

Official study title

Calibration of Esophageal Balloon Catheter in Spontaneous and Mandatory Mechanical Ventilation (PESCA)

Acronym: PESCA

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.