C-SMART vs BE Well for Patients With Brain Tumors

The percentage of participants that are eligible to enroll

The percentage of participants that enroll

The percentage of participants that complete the post-intervention data collection

The percentage of participants that complete the the protocol assigned interventions

Participant ratings of satisfaction. Participants will rate the following questions on a scale from completely disagree to completely agree: C-SMART/BE Well Meets my approval; C-SMART/BE Well is appealing to the patient; "I like C-SMART/BE Well"; "I welcome C-SMART/BE Well". Additionally, participants will answer the following question on a scale from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied: "When you signed up for the study, you were told that you would be randomized to either C-SMART or BE Well Videos. How satisfied are you with the group you were randomized to?"

Participant ratings of intervention recommendation Participants will answer the following question: Would "you" (the patient) recommend C-SMART/BE Well to other brain tumor patients?

The percentage of participants that enroll

The percentage of participants that complete the post-intervention data collection

Participant ratings of satisfaction. Participants will rate the following questions on a scale from completely disagree to completely agree: C-SMART/BE Well Meets my approval; C-SMART/BE Well is appealing to the patient; "I like C-SMART/BE Well"; "I welcome C-SMART/BE Well". Additionally, participants will answer the following question on a scale from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied: "When you signed up for the study, you were told that your loved one would be randomized to either C-SMART or BE Well Videos. How satisfied are you with the group your loved one was randomized to?"

Participant ratings of intervention recommendation. Participants will answer the following question: Would "you" (the caregiver) recommend C-SMART/BE Well to other caregivers?

Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory) neurocognitive test. Participant performance on the verbal learning and memory task will consist of three learning trials and a delay. A high score on the learning trials but a very low score on the delayed recall would show that the person can learn but has difficulty retrieving previously learned information.

Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Controlled Oral Word Association (verbal fluency) neurocognitive test. Participant performance on the verbal fluency task will consist of generating words in 60 seconds on phonemic trials (words that start with a specific letter) and semantic trials (words that fall into a specific category). Scores are the number of correctly retrieved words. A higher raw score indicates greater verbal fluency.

Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on Trail Making (processing speed and task switching). Participant performance will consist of time (in seconds) to complete a processing speed and switching task in which participants are asked to draw lines in sequential order, and then switch between two overlearned sequences. A shorter time to completion would indicate greater processing speed and task switching.

Changes in subjective cognition (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Neuro-Qol Short Form the National Institutes of Health (NIH) toolbox. Participants rate their experience of cognitive slips on 4 questions from "never" to "very often", and 4 questions from "no difficulty" to "cannot do". Higher scores indicate greater subjective cognition. Scores range from 8-40. Raw scores can be converted into standardized scores (T-scores) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Thus, a person who has a T-score of 60 is one SD above the average of the US general population.

Changes in fatigue (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue short form. Participants rate their experience of fatigue on 4 items from "not at all" to "very much". Higher scores indicate greater fatigue. Scores range from 4-20. Raw scores can be converted into standardized scores (T-scores) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Thus, a person who has a T-score of 60 is one SD above the average of the US general population.

Change in brain volume (pre vs. post intervention) between groups based on brain imaging (MRI) data. The volume of lateral ventricle in the hemisphere opposite to the tumor will be measured, using 3D Slicer (https://www.slicer.org) to calculate the ventricular volume at each time point which will serve as an index of diffuse cerebral volume loss.