Case Western Reserve University, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
NCT Number: NCT04358705
The purpose of this research is to understand how flavor affects young adult's perceptions of little cigar or cigarillo use.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–28 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
The overall goal of this study is to examine and better understand adolescent and young adult perceptions, visual attention, use intentions and purchasing behaviors among users and non-users of cigarillos.
Supplemental Aim 1: Consists of evaluation of the differences in perceptions of flavors on appeal, purchasing and risk perceptions of cigarillo products between young adult sexual and gender minorities (SGM) and heterosexual females. A convenience sample of SGM females will be recruited using online social media platforms with targeted advertising. From the parent survey (or Aim 1), an existing sample of female heterosexual cigarillo users will be leveraged. Both samples will receive the same survey, Aim 1, to compare perceptions of appeal, risk, and purchasing across cigarillos and other tobacco products.
Aim 1 of this study is exploratory and will consist of an online survey. Findings from Aim 1 will inform the questions asked about advertising and product use in Aim 2 and 3. Both Aim 2 and 3 are randomized sections. Participants in Aim 2 are either tobacco users or non-users. Participants will be asked to view a series of tobacco related images. The sequence of those images is randomized. In Aim 3, participants will be randomized in terms of the options they are presented within the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM) (i.e. which tobacco items they can purchase and at what price).
Supplemental Aim 3 consists of evaluating the differences in the abuse liability/addictive potential of flavored versus unflavored cigarillos and the substitutability of flavored versus unflavored disposable e-cigarettes between young adult sexual and gender minorities (SGM) and heterosexual females. SGM female cigarillousers will be recruited from participants of the Supplemental Aim 1 sample and be compared to heterosexual female participants of the parent study (or Aim 3). Both samples will receive the same questions and be exposed to the same ETM conditions tocompare perceptions of appeal of flavors and substitutability between cigarillos, e-cigarettes, and other tobacco products.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Aim 1:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Supplemental Aim 1:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Supplemental Aim 1 Interviews:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cognitive Interviews:
Inclusion criteria
Aim 2:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Aim 3:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Supplemental Aim 3:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This survey will evaluate perceptions of flavors on appeal, purchasing and risk perceptions of cigarillo products among young adult and adolescent cigarillo users. This survey will be used to inform survey design for further aims.
As a proxy for biological verification of tobacco use status, data on brand, frequency, and pricing will be collected to confirm user status
Participants will rate the role of flavor and report perceptions of product appeal, health risk, advertising exposure and use intentions. Participants will also complete purchase and substitution tasks.
The eye tracking activity consists of a single in-person eye tracking activity that will take place in a private office in Columbus, Ohio where the participant will be seated in a chair within a typical viewing distance from a computer monitor equipped with an infrared camera on the monitor to capture precise eye movements. Participants will have their gaze monitored continuously by the camera on the computer monitor while a randomized set of stimuli (e.g., tobacco product images) are viewed (n=30) for 10 seconds per image. Following each image, an on-screen closed response question will re-center the participant's gaze for standardization prior to the next image.
Other Names: Participants will complete a survey using Qualtrics immediately after the eye tracking activity and one week following completion of the activity via email to measure recall of brand name, product flavors, perceptions of cigarillo harm, and tobacco use behaviors and intentions.
Administered online via Qualtrics
Participants are given an account balance for use during their assigned ETM based on their average weekly tobacco use calculated from previous interview. Participants will view all four price conditions and all four flavor conditions in random order for a total of 16 rounds
Cigarillo price conditions: 1) market price 2) ½ market price 3) 2X market price 4) 4X market price
Flavor condition: 1) flavored cigarillos and fruit-flavored disposable-cigarettes available 2) unflavored cigarillos and fruit-flavored ecigarettes available 3) flavored cigarillos and tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes available 4) unflavored cigarillos and tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes available.
Participants will purchase cigarillos with their account balance. During all ETM conditions, constant-priced alternative tobacco products (smokeless tobacco, nicotine lozenges, nicotine gum, and the nicotine patch) will be available in addition to the cigarillos and e-cigarettes.
Consists of:
Cognitive Interviews will be done in-person, using Zoom, or over the phone. Interviews will be video or audio recorded. . The participant will be given a select section of the survey questions from Aim 1. The survey will be uploaded to Qualtrics to reflect the way that survey would be conducted in Aim 1. With the survey questions in front of the participant on the computer screen, research personnel will ask probing questions about each one of the survey questions. If the participant is not able to participate in person or via Zoom, they will be allowed to be interview over the phone with access to the Qualtrics survey or a paper form. If the participant is unable to access the internet, the participant will be read the questions by research personnel. The participant will provide feedback about the questions and walk the research personnel through their thought process for approaching each survey question.
Participants from the preceding online survey (who identify as women from Aim 1/supplemental aim 1 survey) who agreed to be contacted for future study will be emailed an invitation to the eligibility screener. Individuals interested will complete a screener to ensure participants identify as women and to verify that they have ever used cigarillos. Eligible participants will be contacted to schedule a 60- to 90-minute Zoom interview about their tobacco, nicotine, and cannabis product use experiences, with particular focus on flavored cigarillo usage initiation, current use, and responses to potential flavor restrictions.
Time frame: At baseline
Within-subjects analyses (one sample paired t-tests) will be used to assess appeal scores of flavored versus unflavored cigarillos in cigarillo users based on initial online survey scores.
Appeal Scores are on a 7-point LIKERT Scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree for three indicators. High values indicate higher greater appeal while low values indicate lower appeal.
Time frame: At baseline
Within-subjects analyses (one sample paired t-tests) will be used to assess appeal scores of flavored cigarillos versus flavored e-cigarettes in cigarillo users based on initial online survey scores.
Appeal Scores are on a 7-point LIKERT Scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree for three indicators. High values indicate higher greater appeal while low values indicate lower appeal.
Time frame: At baseline
Within-subjects analyses (one sample paired t-tests) will be used to assess perceptions of harm of flavored cigarillos versus unflavored cigarillos in cigarillo users as assessed by initial online survey scores.
Perception of Harm scores are on a 3-point scale: Less harmful, about the same level (or as harmful), and more harmful. Higher values indicate more perceived harm while lower values indicate less perceived harm.
Time frame: Immediately after exposure to product advertisements
Visual attention as assessed by dwell time visual attention on product packages across a set of only flavored, only unflavored or mixed flavor advertisements
Time frame: Immediately after exposure to product advertisements
Attentional bias in flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo advertisements. Attentional bias is defined as greater duration of attention to flavored stimuli.
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Abuse liability of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo as measured by sensitivity (alpha): The sensitivity of demand and the measure of cigarillo purchasing across the price function.
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Abuse liability of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo as measured by Intensity (Q0): The intensity of demand and level of cigarillo purchasing at the lowest cost
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Substitutability of flavored e-cigarettes versus unflavored e-cigarettes. To analyze the level of substitution of alternative tobacco products, the study team will fit linear regressions for each product type. Consistent with previous research slopes that significantly differ from zero will be considered substitutes.
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Degree of substitutability of flavored e-cigarettes when compared to various cigarillo flavors.
To analyze the level of substitution of alternative tobacco products, the study team will fit linear regressions for each product type. Consistent with previous research slopes that significantly differ from zero will be considered substitutes. To compare substitutability in the four flavors, slopes will be compared across the four ETM conditions using one-way ANOVA
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Future use intentions of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo advertisements.
Future Use Intentions are scored on a 4-point scale: Definitely not, probably not, probably yes, definitely yes. Higher values indicate greater intention to use tobacco product(s) and lower values indicate lower intention to use tobacco product(s)
Time frame: Immediately after exposure to product advertisements
Perceptions of harm of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo advertisements (assessed on absolute and relative risk scales).
Perception of Harm scores are on a 3-point scale: Less harmful, about the same level (or as harmful), and more harmful. Higher values indicate more perceived harm while lower values indicate less perceived harm.
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Perceptions of harm of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo advertisements (assessed on absolute and relative risk scales).
Perception of Harm scores are on a 3-point scale: Less harmful, about the same level (or as harmful), and more harmful. Higher values indicate more perceived harm while lower values indicate less perceived harm.
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Product use intentions (any/none) at the one- week follow-up survey
Time frame: One week after exposure to product advertisements
Appeal ratings of flavored cigarillos products versus unflavored cigarillo advertisements.
Appeal Scores are on a 7-point LIKERT Scale from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree for three indicators. High values indicate higher greater appeal while low values indicate lower appeal.
Time frame: At baseline and immediately after ETM
Participants evaluate themselves on eight DSM-5 symptoms associated with tobacco withdrawal on a five-point scale from None to Severe and each item is scored from 0 (None) to 4 (Severe). Total scores range from 0 to 32 on this scale with higher scores indicating greater levels of withdrawal.
Time frame: At baseline
Participants report their level of agreement with twelve statements related to nicotine dependence on a five-point Likert scale from Never to Always. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater nicotine dependence.
Also asked on Aim 1 Survey
Time frame: At baseline and immediately after ETM
Participants report their level of agreement with twelve statements related to nicotine dependence on a five-point Likert scale from Never to Always. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater nicotine dependence.
Also asked on Aim 1 Survey
Time frame: At baseline
Participants are asked how likely they are to use six flavors of cigarillos on a four-point scale from Definitely Never Use to Regularly Use.
Time frame: At baseline and immediately after ETM
Participants are asked how likely they are to use six flavors of cigarillos on a four-point scale from Definitely Never Use to Regularly Use.
Time frame: At baseline
Participants are asked their perceptions of six different cigarillo flavors on a six-point scale from Very Bad (1) to Very Good (6). Also asked on Aim 1 Survey.
Each item will receive a rating from 1 (Very Bad) to 6 (Very Good), but these will not be added together in a scale
Time frame: At baseline and immediately after ETM
Participants are asked their perceptions of six different cigarillo flavors on a six-point scale from Very Bad (1) to Very Good (6). Also asked on Aim 1 Survey.
Each item will receive a rating from 1 (Very Bad) to 6 (Very Good), but these will not be added together in a scale
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06191419
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03083353
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07092501
Behavior, Cigarette
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05490251
Behavior, Fractures, Bone
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details