Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00422968

Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

The primary objective of the PRE-COMBAT trial is:

To establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting balloon expandable stent (Cordis Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) compared with bypass surgery for the treatment of an unprotected LMCA stenosis. The alternative hypothesis is that the experimental strategy (coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stents) is not inferior to the standard strategy (bypass surgery).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Despite bypass surgery has been considered as the standard strategy for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions, several studies have demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected LMCA is feasible and appears to be an alternative strategy in selected patients. However, the safety and efficacy of PCI in patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis are still a matter of debate.

Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of unprotected LMCA intervention using bare metal stents (BMS). There was a favorable initial outcome after LMCA intervention using BMS in low-risk patients. However, in-stent restenosis after BMS implantation has emerged as the interference to widely perform PCI for unprotected LMCA lesions and the most important reason for selection of bypass surgery as the first choice for treating LMCA stenosis. In-stent restenosis in these patients not only influences long-term survival, but also make repeat intervention more complex. Despite endeavors to decrease in-stent restenosis after LMCA intervention using BMS, such as aggressive debulking atherectomy, the restenosis rate still remains at 20-30%. The sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Cypher, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson Corp, Miami, Florida) markedly decreases in-stent restenosis in elective patients with relatively simple coronary lesions. In real-world practice using SES, patients undergoing SES implantation were treated with a less restrictive interventional approach. However, the results are very promising similar to the randomized controlled trials. These findings warrant new studies to compare the efficacy of SES for more complex lesion subsets including LMCA disease with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Significant de novo left main stenosis (>50% by visual estimation) with or without any additional target lesions (>70% by visual estimation)
  • Left main lesion and lesions outside LMCA (if present) potentially equally treatable with coronary stenting and bypass surgery
  • Patients with stable (CCS class 1 to 4) or acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina pectoris Braunwald class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC or NSTEMI) or patients with atypical chest pain or without symptoms but having documented myocardial ischemia
  • The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

  • The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications:
  • Heparin
  • Aspirin
  • Both Clopidogrel and TIclopidine
  • Sirolimus, paclitaxel, ABT 578
  • Stainless steel and/or
  • Contrast media (patients with documented sensitivity to contrast which can be effectively pre-medicated with steroids and diphenhydramine [e.g. rash] may be enrolled. Patients with true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media, however, should not be enrolled).
  • Systemic (intravenous) Sirolimus, paclitaxel or ABT-578 use within 12 months.
  • Any previous PCI within 1 year
  • Previous bypass surgery
  • Any previous PCI of a LMCA or ostial left circumflex artery or ostial left anterior descending artery lesion within 1 year
  • Intention to treat more than one totally occluded major epicardial vessel
  • Acute MI patients within 1 week
  • Patients with EF<30%.
  • Patients with cardiogenic shock
  • Any disabled stroke with neurological deficit or any cerebrovascular accident within 6 months
  • Creatinine level > 2.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT > 3 times upper normal reference values).
  • Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
  • History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.
  • Current known current platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb <10 g/dL.
  • An elective surgical procedure is planned that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 1 year post enrollment.
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • Subject unable or unwilling to follow-up with visits required by protocol
  • Female of childbearing potential, unless a recent pregnancy test is negative, who possibly plan to become pregnant any time after enrollment into this study

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Device

Using silorimus eluting stent

Coronary artery bypass graft

Procedure

coronary artery bypass graft

Primary outcomes

  1. Major cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE): the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ischemica-driven target vessel revascularization

    Time frame: one-year after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  2. Cardiac death

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  3. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  4. Cerebrovascular accident

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  5. Target vessel revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  6. Target lesion revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  7. Stent thrombosis in the PCI group

    Time frame: at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and yearly to 5 years

  8. Binary restenosis in both in-stent and in-segment

    Time frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up

  9. Graft patency and reocclusion rate

    Time frame: at 9 months angiographic follow-up

  10. Late luminal loss in both in-stent and in-segment

    Time frame: at 9 month angiographic follow-up

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Seung-Jung Park

Other

Registry information

Official study title

PREmier of Randomized COMparison of Bypass Surgery Versus AngioplasTy Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Acronym: PRECOMBAT

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jan 17, 2007
Registry last updated
May 1, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.