High flow oxygen
Devicehumidified and heated oxygen delivered at high flow rates via nasal cannula, with protocol to target SpO2 90-94%
NCT Number: NCT05754034
Acute hypoxemia is common and deadly in resource variable settings. While studies in high income countries (HICs) have indicated a possible benefit to high flow oxygen as compared with standard flow oxygen, rigorous studies in low or lower middle income countries (LMICs) have not been performed. Studies in sepsis have demonstrated that interventions that improve outcomes in one context may actually be neutral or harmful in a different context.
The goal of this study is to test whether high flow oxygen results in better outcomes for hypoxemic adult patients, as compared with standard flow oxygen, in five LMIC hospitals. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. For hypoxemic adults in these LMIC study settings, does high flow oxygen or standard flow oxygen result in lower mortality? 2. What are the facilitators and barriers to using high flow oxygen in these settings? 3. Does high flow or standard flow oxygen use more oxygen?
Participants will be randomized to receive either high flow oxygen through a large nasal cannula, or to receive standard flow oxygen, through nasal cannulas, face masks, or non-rebreather masks. Researchers will compare the outcomes for the two groups, to see if one group of patients has better outcomes than the other.
The study will also examine how much oxygen is used by the two patient groups, as well as other factors relevant to the feasibility of implementation of high flow oxygen in these sites.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
AIC Kijabe Hospital, Kijabe, Kenya
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
humidified and heated oxygen delivered at high flow rates via nasal cannula, with protocol to target SpO2 90-94%
oxygen delivered at standard flow rates via nasal cannula, facemask, or nonrebreather mask, with protocol to target SpO2 90-94%
Time frame: Day 90
Death between randomization and end of hospitalization
Time frame: Day 90
Death between randomization and 90 days
Time frame: Day 90
Functional status 90 days after randomization, as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Time frame: Day 90
Met criteria for need to escalate respiratory therapy to NIV or invasive ventilation, or escalated to NIV or mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Day 90
Days requiring oxygen from randomization to end of hospitalization
Time frame: Day 90
Days from randomization to hospital discharge or death
Time frame: Day 90
Total days in the ICU during hospitalization
Time frame: Day 90
Time to meeting clinical criteria for escalation to non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation
Time frame: Day 90
Time to escalation to non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation
Time frame: Day 90
Total oxygen consumed during hospitalization
Time frame: 90 days
Re-admission to the hospital after discharge and before 90 days
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Elisabeth Riviello, MD, MPH
CONTACT
Theogene Twagirumugabe, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Other
Acronym: BREATHE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.