HealthWorks for Northern Virginia
Leesburg, Virginia, 20176, United States
NCT Number: NCT05419557
The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of an expanded virtual educational program at modifying knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors when compared to traditional in-office counseling for guardians of children who are obese or overweight.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Leesburg, Virginia, 20176, United States
Rationale: Obesity rates are significantly higher among Hispanic youth in the United States, disproportionately putting these children at an increased risk for obesity-related diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose tolerance. While virtual programming offers an innovative option for pediatric weight management, limited data exists on the efficacy of virtual interventions for this population and their guardians (parents / caregivers).
Objectives: The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the effectiveness of an expanded virtual educational program (expanded -Inova Healthy Plate Club, x-IHPC) at modifying knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors when compared to traditional in-office counseling for guardians of children who are obese or overweight.
Study Design: In order to test the effectiveness of the x-IHPC intervention, outcomes from participants in this pilot study will be compared with outcomes from a comparison group of similar participants who receive standard nutrition counseling during their regularly scheduled check-ups. The team will enroll 25 children in the x-IHPC intervention and the same number in the comparison group (n=50). Both groups will receive standard in-office counseling, but the intervention group will also receive the x-IHPC.
Study Methodology: The comparison group receives standard, in-office counseling at visits 1, 3-months and 6-months. The intervention group receives standard in-office counseling at the same intervals, and also participates in a 12-week x-IHPC developed by a dietician curriculum specialist. In addition, a key pillar of this study is identifying and training Community Health Workers (CHWs) to be Spanish-speaking facilitators of the x-IHPC and utilizing community engagement strategies. Training these CHWs and including them in designing the x-IHPC curriculum, will ensure that the programming is culturally appropriate; includes local features that relate directly to the community's needs; and enables study facilitators to respond effectively to the questions and learning needs of the parents and children involved in the program.
Statistical Methodology:
To examine the research question, a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) will be conducted to assess if mean differences exist on dietary measures, screen time, sleep quality, physical activity and guardian self-efficacy and confidence between the intervention and comparison groups while accounting for the correlation among the repeated measurements and controlling for covariates.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
include:
Exclusion criteria
IHPC provides produce boxes, nutrition and meal-preparation, education, and supportive counseling to address barriers related to obtaining produce and food. The intervention provides participants with a bi-weekly produce box for 12 weeks and helps families identify sustainable ways to obtain vegetables once the produce boxes end. The CHW will support families by coaching them on how to prepare these unfamiliar vegetables, give tips on finding sales at grocery stores, as well as by navigation to food assistance sites including food pantries. Parents will learn strategies to increase vegetable consumption by addressing perceived barriers - such as the child doesn't like vegetables. Curriculum will also include topics such as how to increase physical activity and reduce screen time.
Time frame: 3 months post-study intervention
Days per week child ate vegetables with dinner meal, post intervention Measured with a food frequency questionnaire, question: "Think about all the foods your child ate at your dinner/supper meal and snacks in the past week. On how many days did your child eat vegetables for the dinner meal?" Answer options: 1, Never | 2, 1-3 days | 3, 1-2 days | 4, 3-4 days | 5, 5-6 days | 6, Every day (Higher score indicates increased vegetable consumption)
Time frame: 3 months post-study intervention
Guardians who reported being Confident or Very Confident that they could increase the number of vegetables the child eats each week As measured by guardian self-efficacy and confidence questions related to modifiable lifestyle behaviors on a likert scale Question: How confident do you feel that you can increase the number of vegetables your child eats each week? Likert Scale: 1, Not confident = It is impossible for me to do this | 2, Somewhat confident = Maybe I can do this | 3, Confident = I think I can do this | 4, Very confident = I can absolutely do this (Higher score indicates better outcome than lower score on Likert scale)
Inova Health Care Services
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04252677
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04743531
Behavior, Body Weight
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05790174
Behavior, Body Weight
View Trial DetailsNCT06160258
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Spokane, Washington, United States
View Trial Details