University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT02019758
Purpose: To determine whether oral viscous budesonide (OVB) or fluticasone metered dose inhaler (MDI) most effectively treats EoE by improving histologic findings and symptoms, which medication provides a more durable treatment response, and whether biomarkers can predict treatment response.
Participants: A total of up to 200 16-80 year old patients with a new diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who are referred for upper endoscopy will be consented with a target of 122 randomized.
Procedures: This will be a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial comparing OVB to fluticasone MDI for treatment of EoE. This overall study design will generate data for all three Aims
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
This will be a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial comparing oral viscous budesonide (OVB) to fluticasone metered dose inhaler (MDI) for treatment of EoE. A total of 122 subjects aged 16-80 years old will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two active treatment arms: OVB + placebo inhaler or fluticasone MDI + placebo slurry.
In the first arm, subjects will be treated with OVB at a dose of 1 mg twice daily, and they will also be instructed to use a placebo inhaler identical to the fluticasone MDI, with instructions to swallow 4 puffs twice daily. The OVB is a slurry equivalent to what is used clinically: 1 mg/4 mL aqueous budesonide mixed with 10 g of sucralose. Rather than asking the subjects to mix the slurry on their own and risk inconsistent formulations, the University of North Carolina (UNC) investigational drug pharmacy (IDP) will provide pre-mixed OVB to all patients. The IDP will also provide placebo inhalers to all patients. The dose for OVB has been chosen because it is the most commonly studied dose, including one prior study led by this Principal Investigator, so we can accurately estimate response rates.
In the second arm, subjects will be treated with fluticasone MDI at a dose of 880 mcg twice daily (4 puffs of a 220 mcg inhaler twice daily), and they will also be instructed to take 4 mL twice daily of a placebo slurry of sucralose identical in consistency and taste to the OVB. The UNC investigational drug pharmacy (IDP) will provide the fluticasone MDIs and pre-mixed placebo slurries to all patients. The dose for fluticasone MDI has been chosen because this is the most commonly used dose in adolescents and adults with EoE, so effect estimates are also available.
For both arms, the slurry will be administered first, the MDI will be administered 15 minutes later, and patients will take nothing by mouth for an additional 30 minutes.
Subjects will receive 8 weeks of treatment and will then be monitored for up to 52 weeks for recurrence of symptoms.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
are as follows:
Exclusion criteria
are as follows:
Oral Viscous Budesonide - 1 mg/4 mL, 4 mL of slurry twice daily
Other names: Pulmicort
Fluticasone multi-dose inhaler - 4 puffs twice daily (880 mcg, twice daily)
Other names: Flovent
Slurry of sucralose - 4 mL twice daily
Other names: Sucralose
Placebo inhaler - 4 puffs twice daily
Other names: Placebo
Time frame: 8 weeks
To determine whether viscous budesonide is more effective than fluticasone MDI for improving post-treatment maximum esophageal eosinophil counts (measured in eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf)) in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The mean post-treatment maximum eosinophil count will be compared between the OVB and MDI groups using a two-sample t-test.
Time frame: 8 weeks
To determine whether viscous budesonide is more effective than fluticasone MDI for improving dysphagia (measured by the Daily Symptoms Questionnaire (DSQ)) in patients with EoE. The mean DSQ scores will be compared between the OVB and MDI groups using a two-sample t-test. The DSQ is a dysphagia severity score which ranges from 0-84, with higher numbers indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Endoscopic severity will be quantified using the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) and compared between the two treatment arms. EREFS is a validated endoscopic severity score of key EoE endoscopic features (exudates, rings, edema, furrows, and strictures), and ranges from 0-9 with higher scores indicating higher endoscopic severity.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Percentage with histologic response, with response defined as <15 eos/hpf, will be compared between groups
Time frame: 8 weeks
Post-treatment symptoms severity will be assessed with the EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI), a validated dysphagia severity measure. The EEsAI ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; symptom remission is defined by a score <20.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Medication compliance as measured by the percentage of medication appropriately used in each arm. For the slurry, this percentage is calculated after measuring the residual volume. For the inhaler, this percentage is calculated after measured using the residual weight.
Time frame: Symptom recurrence or 1 year after completing the initial 8 week treatment
To test whether OVB results in less symptomatic recurrence than fluticasone MDI, the median number of days until symptom occurrence will be quantified between treatment end (week 8) and recurrent symptoms or study end (week 60) as the time of interest. Hazard ratio will be calculated using Cox proportional modeling.
Time frame: Symptom recurrence or 1 year after completing the initial 8 week treatment
To test whether OVB results in less histologic recurrence than fluticasone MDI, the number of subjects with ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field at follow-up endoscopy in each group will be compared using chi-square.
Time frame: Symptom recurrence or 1 year after completing the initial 8 week treatment
Measurement of endoscopic severity, using the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) measure, at the time of recurrence. EREFS is a validated endoscopic severity score of key EoE endoscopic features (exudates, rings, edema, furrows, and strictures), and ranges from 0-9 with higher scores indicating higher endoscopic severity.
Time frame: Symptom recurrence or 1 year after completing the initial 8 week treatment
This will assess the mean peak level of esophageal eosinophilia on biopsy (measured in peak eosinophil count - eos/hpf) at the time of recurrence
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06501274
Digestive System Diseases, Eosinophilia
Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01988285
Digestive System Diseases, Eosinophilia
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07093008
Digestive System Diseases, Eosinophilia
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05774184
Digestive System Diseases, Eosinophilia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details