Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07706309

Bronchoscopic Versus Airway Exchange Catheter-Guided Endotracheal Tube Exchange

This prospective experimental study compares two methods for replacing an endotracheal tube in Thiel-embalmed body donors. The conventional method uses an airway exchange catheter based on the Seldinger technique, whereas the investigational method uses a flexible bronchoscope to provide direct visual guidance throughout the exchange.

The primary outcome is the duration of interrupted ventilation, measured from cessation of ventilation until ventilation is resumed through a correctly positioned replacement tube. Secondary outcomes include unsuccessful tube exchange requiring complete reintubation, duration of individual procedural steps, procedures lasting more than 60 seconds, use of additional rescue equipment, and unforeseen technical difficulties.

Both techniques will be performed in two Thiel-embalmed donated human bodies using an alternating sequence. Four experienced physicians will perform 40 tube exchanges per technique, resulting in a total of 80 procedures.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Unversity Hospital of Basel

Basel, Switzerland

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Léo Franchetti, MD

CONTACT

About this study

Endotracheal tube exchange may be required because of cuff failure, inappropriate tube size, tube damage, luminal obstruction, or the need for a planned intervention. During conventional tube exchange over an airway exchange catheter, continuous visualization of the subglottic airway and trachea is not possible. Consequently, advancement of the replacement tube may fail or may result in airway injury.

The bronchoscopic tube-exchange technique is intended to provide continuous visual control throughout the procedure and immediate confirmation of the replacement tube position.

The study will be conducted using two human bodies donated for medical education and research and preserved using the Thiel embalming method. Before each experimental series, the donated body will be intubated with a 7.5-mm endotracheal tube, and tracheobronchial secretions will be suctioned.

Two experienced physicians in intensive care medicine and anesthesiology will perform the conventional airway exchange catheter-guided technique, and two experienced pulmonologists will perform the bronchoscopic technique. To minimize order, learning, and tissue-wear effects, the techniques will be alternated. The starting technique will differ between the two body donors.

Each physician will perform 10 tube exchanges per body donor using the assigned technique, resulting in 20 procedures per physician, 40 procedures per technique, and 80 procedures overall.

Procedure timing will be based on predefined start and end points. The primary interval begins when ventilation is interrupted and ends when ventilation is resumed through the correctly positioned replacement tube. A trained observer will record procedural times, individual procedural steps, technical difficulties, use of additional equipment, and unsuccessful exchanges using a standardized source document.

Where feasible, video or photographic documentation may be used to verify procedure timing and technical events. The face will remain covered to prevent identification of the body donor.

Continuous outcomes will be analyzed using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Paired dichotomous outcomes will be analyzed using the McNemar test. Descriptive statistics will include medians, interquartile ranges, and ranges.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Human body donor preserved using the Thiel embalming method.
  • Intact trachea without relevant postmortem or preparation-related lesions.
  • Documented consent for scientific use of the body and confirmation of anatomical suitability by the Institute of Anatomy.
  • Sufficient mobility of the neck, jaw, and laryngeal region to permit realistic tube-exchange maneuvers.

Exclusion criteria

  • Tumor or stenosis involving the larynx, trachea, or central airways.
  • Previous surgery or radiotherapy involving the larynx or oral cavity.
  • Previous pneumonectomy.
  • Previous tracheotomy or laryngectomy.
  • Inability to achieve safe or standardized positioning of the cadaver.
  • Incomplete consent documentation or unclear provenance.
  • Preservation using a fixation method other than the Thiel method.

Treatment and study plan

Airway Exchange Catheter-Guided Endotracheal Tube Exchange

Procedure

The existing tube fixation is released. A Cook airway exchange catheter is advanced through the in-situ endotracheal tube into the tracheobronchial tree. Ventilation is interrupted, the cuff is deflated, and the old tube is removed over the catheter. A new endotracheal tube is advanced over the catheter, the catheter is removed, the cuff is inflated, ventilation is resumed, and tube position is verified by lung auscultation.

Other names: Cook Catheter Tube Exchange

Bronchoscope-Guided Endotracheal Tube Exchange

Procedure

The replacement tube is preloaded onto a therapeutic flexible bronchoscope. The bronchoscope is advanced alongside the in-situ tube through the larynx into the trachea, and proximal tracheal secretions are suctioned. Ventilation is interrupted and the old tube is removed. The replacement tube is advanced over the bronchoscope into the trachea under direct visual control. The bronchoscope is removed, the cuff is inflated, and ventilation is resumed.

Other names: Bronchoscopic tube exchange

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilation interruption time during endotracheal tube exchange

    Time frame: During each tube-exchange procedure, from ventilation interruption to resumption (expected duration less than 5 minutes).

    Time in seconds from interruption of ventilation until ventilation is resumed through the correctly positioned replacement tube

Secondary outcomes

  1. Unsuccessful tube exchange requiring complete reintubation - number and proportion of exchanges in which the assigned technique is abandoned and full reintubation is required.

    Time frame: Assessed during each tube-exchange procedure (approximately 5 minutes per procedure).

  2. Duration of individual procedural steps - time in seconds for predefined components, including preparation and tube advancement.

    Time frame: Assessed during each tube-exchange procedure (approximately 5 minutes per procedure).

  3. Tube exchanges lasting more than 60 seconds - number and proportion of procedures with ventilation interruption exceeding 60 seconds.

    Time frame: Assessed during each tube-exchange procedure (approximately 5 minutes per procedure).

  4. Use of additional rescue equipment - number and proportion of exchanges requiring an additional device, such as a laryngoscope.

    Time frame: Assessed during each tube-exchange procedure (approximately 5 minutes per procedure).

  5. Unforeseen technical difficulties - type and frequency of technical problems not predefined in the protocol.

    Time frame: Assessed during each tube-exchange procedure (approximately 5 minutes per procedure).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Léo Franchetti, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 61 265 25 25

Prof. Jürgen Hetzel, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 61 328 61 95

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Léo Franchetti

Other

Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Registry information

Official study title

Bronchoscopic Endotracheal Tube Exchange as an Alternative to Airway Exchange Catheter-Guided Tube Exchange: A Prospective Study

Acronym: Bronchex

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.