Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07364188

Bronchodilator Response in COPD and Asthma: Correlation Between Spirometry, IOS Indices, and Dyspnea Relief

A bronchodilator reversibility test is widely used in the diagnosis and management of obstructive lung diseases.

Bronchodilators relieve symptoms in asthma and COPD. Traditionally, their effectiveness has been assessed using spirometric indices, particularly FEV₁. However, changes in FEV₁ often do not correlate well with patients' subjective experience of dyspnoea relief or with changes in small airway function.

Impulse oscillometry (IOS) provides an effort-independent assessment of respiratory mechanics during tidal breathing and is more sensitive to small airway dysfunction than spirometry. Despite this, the clinical utility of IOS in routine COPD and asthma assessment remains underexplored, and its relationship to both spirometric response and symptom relief is not fully established, and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for IOS parameters has not been firmly established. Determining the MCID is essential for interpreting individual patient responses in a clinically meaningful way and for guiding treatment decisions in both research and practice.

Hypothesis & Aims

In patients with either asthma or COPD baseline values and bronchodilator responses are compared. More specifically, this study aims to:

1. assess baseline correlations: Evaluate the correlation between ΔX5-baseline (EFL expiratory flow limitation=small airway collapse during expiration), RV/TLC-baseline, X5-average at baseline, FEV1-baseline, VAS-dyspnea at baseline, and ACQ-6-baseline. 2. compare bronchodilator responses across methods: Examine the correlation between bronchodilator-induced changes in FEV₁ and IOS parameters (including both average and delta values) and explore their relationship with short-term changes in dyspnea. 3. establish clinical relevance: Determine the MCID for key IOS variables using both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches, anchored to perceived changes in lung symptoms.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Introduction and aims: see brief summary.

Method and Patients This is a real-life, cross-sectional analysis of a single-centered, observational study on 60 adult patients with clinical diagnosed asthma and 60 COPD patients, consecutively recruited between February 1, 2026, and June 30, 2027, and followed at least 6 months for diagnostic clarification.

Inclusion criteria

Both asthma and COPD patients:

  • Written informed consent.
  • FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) <0.7 at baseline )
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max).

Asthma: Doctor diagnosed asthma 1. less than 10 packyears.

COPD: Doctor diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC <0.7 post-bronchodilation

  • Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients aged less than 18 years old.
  • Not able to perform spirometry or impulse oscillometry.
  • Cognitive disorders and not able to answer Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), VAS dyspnea score, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score.
  • Short-acting beta-agonists 6 h, long-acting beta-agonists 2 days, short-acting anti-muscarinic agent 12 h, Long-acting anti-muscarinic agents 2 days.
  • Comorbidities with significant influence on dyspnea eg. bronchiectasis, ILS, mb. Cordis, lung resection, anemia, and active malignant disease
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

It is a real-life study where most patients are followed up within 6 months. The diagnosis - asthma, COPD, or other condition - may change after follow-up (maximum 6 months after the index examination).

Minimal Clinical Important Difference

Anchor-Based Methods:

  • The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-based method determines the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) by identifying the value that maximizes the Youden Index. This index is calculated as the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity. Using data from patients who rate themselves "a little better" and patients who rate themselves "no change"
  • The social comparison approach provides the MCID as the mean of two differences: the difference of mean score between patients who rate themselves as "a little worse" and patients who rate themselves "no change".
  • Within-patients score change MCID is the mean delta score of patients who rate themselves "a little better".
  • The methods of 95% limits of upper agreement: MCID is the mean delta score -1.96 standard error of the delta score of the patients who answered "no change"

Distribution-Based Methods:

  • MCID defined as standard error of measurement (SEM) evaluated on the baseline values from patients who rated themselves "no change".
  • MCID defined as 0.5 SD of delta score from patients who answered "a little better"
  • MCID is defined as 1.96 × √2 × SEM, assessed on baseline values from patients who reported "no change", which represents the smallest change in a measurement that can be considered a "real" change, rather than just random measurement error.

Brochodilator test and order of test To avoid or minimize the effect of deep inhalation on IOS, IOS was performed at least 15 minutes after spirometry and body box.

Patients were administered 4 doses of 0.1 mg Ventoline (salbutamol) via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and spacer (Aero Champer). Post-IOS and post-spirometry were performed 15-20 minutes after the bronchodilator inhalation

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both asthma and COPD patients:
  • Written informed consent.
  • FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) <0.7 at baseline (7)
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) dyspnea score ≥10 (0-100, 100 max) (25,26).
  • Asthma: Doctor diagnosed asthma
  • less than 10 packyears.
  • COPD: Doctor diagnosed COPD with FEV1/FVC <0.7 post-bronchodilation 1. Smokers or ex-smokers with ≥10 packyears

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients aged less than 18 years old.
  • Not able to perform spirometry or impulse oscillometry.
  • Cognitive disorders and not able to answer Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), VAS dyspnea score, and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score (25-28).
  • Short-acting beta-agonists 6 h, long-acting beta-agonists 2 days, short-acting anti-muscarinic agent 12 h, Long-acting anti-muscarinic agents 2 days.
  • Comorbidities with significant influence on dyspnea eg. bronchiectasis, ILS, mb. Cordis, lung resection, anemia, and active malignant disease
  • BMI ≥40 kg/m2.

Treatment and study plan

Bronchodilator

Diagnostic Test

Classic beta-2-reversibility test

Primary outcomes

  1. FEV1

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Forced expiratory volumen in one second, L and % predicted

  2. X5

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Reactance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s

  3. Dyspnoea

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Visual analog scale (0-100); 0 means no dyspnoea, and 100 means maximum dyspnoea

Secondary outcomes

  1. R5

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Resistance at 5 Hz, kPa/L/s and % predicted

  2. R5-R20

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Resistance in small airways, kPa/L/s

  3. Fres

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Resonant frequency (stiffness), Hz

  4. AX

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Area of reactance, kPa/L

  5. Delta-X5

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Inspiratory - expiratory difference in X5, kPa/L/s

  6. Delta R5

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Inspiratory - expiratory difference in R5 (total resitance), kPa/L/s

  7. FEF 25-75

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    Expiratory Flow at 25% to 75% during spirometry, L and % predicted

  8. FEV1/FVC-ratio

    Time frame: Before and 20 minuttes after inhaled Salbutamol 0.4 mg

    FEV1/forced expiratory capacity (FVC)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lars Frølund, MSci

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4521777696

Thomas J Ringbæk, MSci

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4521969087

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Allergi- og Lungeklinikken, Elsinore

Network

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.