Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept on Visual and Anatomical Outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema

The study retrospectively evaluated real-world outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy in treatment-naïve patients with center-involving DME. Participants were assigned into two equal groups based on the anti-VEGF agent received: Group A was treated with intravitreal Brolucizumab (6 mg), and Group B with intravitreal Aflibercept (2 mg). All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation at baseline and at monthly intervals, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to monitor central retinal thickness (CRT). The primary outcomes were changes in BCVA and CRT from baseline to 6 months, while secondary outcomes included the number of injections received and any adverse events. This study aimed to provide comparative insights into the efficacy, anatomical response, and safety profile of the two anti-VEGF agents in managing DME in a real-world clinical setting.

Inclusion criteria

• Patients diagnosed with center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
• Central macular thickness (CMT) > 350 µm at baseline.
• Treatment-naïve patients (no prior intravitreal injections or laser therapy for DME).

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with media opacity (e.g., corneal opacities, dense vitreous hemorrhage).
• Significant cataract affecting visual acuity or OCT imaging quality.
• Traction maculopathy or vitreomacular traction.
• Central macular thickness < 350 µm at baseline.
• History of vasculitis or autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]).