Bringing the Outdoors In: Virtual Nature Walks for Depression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients

This is an 8-item evaluating various aspects of depression, including negative mood, anhedonia, feelings of worthlessness, and cognitive impairments. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from never (1) - always (5). Scores range from 8-40 with a higher score indicating greater symptom severity.

A benchmark of 70% will indicate adequate feasibility and acceptability.

The modified scale for this project uses 10 questions that participants will answer about the VR experience, rated from 1 (extremely low or extremely difficult) to 7 (extremely high or extremely easy). The scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater experience. A benchmark of 70% indicates adequate feasibility and acceptability, with participant satisfaction ratings above 80%.

Semi-structured interviews with 20 random participants (6-7 from each group) who received the VR treatment to capture participants' subjective experiences at the midpoint and end of the intervention.

The interview questions will focus on emotional changes, engagement levels, and feedback on the intervention's implementation.

Feasibility will be assessed via enrollment. Recruitment will be quantified by enrollment rates relative to the number of eligibility screenings.

Feasibility: Retention will be evaluated through the percentage of participants who complete the entire study duration, targeting a benchmark of at least 70%.

Feasibility: Adherence to 5-15-minute sessions 3 times per week over 8 weeks

This consists of eight items assessing various dimensions of anxiety, including feelings of fear, worry, hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from never (1) - always (5). Scores range from 8-40 with a higher score indicating greater anxiety.

It comprises 10 items that assess how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from Never (0) to Very Often (4).

The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress. While there are no established cut-off scores, higher scores suggest higher levels of perceived stress.

It comprises 19 items, generating seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. The component scores are summed to yield a global PSQI score ranging from 0 to 21. A global score greater than 5 suggests poor sleep quality.

This is a brief self-report tool that evaluates the nature, severity, and impact of insomnia. It consists of seven items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = no problem to 4 = very severe problem), assessing areas such as difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, satisfaction with sleep, and the extent to which sleep problems interfere with daily functioning. The total score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia. Interpretation of scores is as follows: 0-7 (no clinically significant insomnia), 8-14 (subthreshold insomnia), 15-21 (moderate insomnia), and 22-28 (severe insomnia).

The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a is a validated self-report instrument designed to assess fatigue over the past seven days. It consists of seven items that evaluate the frequency and severity of fatigue and its impact on daily activities. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Never" (1) to "Always" (5). The raw scores are summed and converted into standardized T-scores, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, based on the U.S. general population. Higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue severity. A change of 3 to 5 T-score points is generally considered clinically meaningful.