Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05671718

Bring BPaL2Me Trial Comparing Nurse-Led RR-TB Treatment to Physician-Led RR-TB Treatment

The goal of the BringBPaL2Me Trial, a multi-principal investigator, multi-site, cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial is to compare nurse-led RR-TB treatment in primary care clinics to standard of care physician-led RR-TB treatment at district hospitals in the provinces of KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng, and Eastern Cape.

The main aim is to conduct a 5-year, analyst and clinical safety review committee blinded, multi-site, cluster randomized trial to evaluate 1) treatment outcome; 2) safety; 3) patient associated catastrophic costs with the following hypotheses:

1. Outpatient nurse-led treatment in PCCs will be non-inferior to outpatient physician-led treatment at hospital-based outpatient sites among RR-TB patients, regardless of HIV co-infection, as determined by a successful treatment outcome [H1]. 2. The proportion of SAEs identified will not significantly differ by blinded, independent review [H2]. 3. Patient associated catastrophic costs (i.e., costs 20% or more of household income) will be lower in nurse-led treatment [H3].

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

In South Africa (SA), nurses manage drug-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) and TB/HIV coinfection within primary care clinics (PCCs); the TB treatment outcomes in this care model rival the best in the world. A primary care management strategy offers a convenient, patient-centered, model of care that integrates TB and HIV treatment within the same setting. However, a diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB), upends this model, requiring referral to a hospital-based, physician-led outpatient treatment center.

Hospital-based models add significant costs to patients, with estimates suggesting more than 80% of RR-TB patients experience catastrophic costs. Such added costs may decrease access to care, delay treatment receipt and contribute to loss to follow-up. One testable solution to this problem, however, is to move RR-TB care to primary care clinics led by nurses. The World Health Organization (WHO) released recommendations for RR-TB treatment earlier this year endorsing 6-month regimens and calling for decentralized, patient-centered models of care closer to the patient's home.

Although SA has long been a leading implementer of nurse-led models of care for TB and HIV due to large physician shortages and the National Department of Health's (NDoH) RR-TB Treatment Guidelines recommend integration of RR-TB within PCCs supporting both physician- and nurse-led models, utilization has been limited. While the team has spent the last decade building observational evidence around outcomes and safety, no randomized controlled trial evaluates nurse-led RR-TB treatment.

Secondary Aims: To evaluate clinical and cost-associated differentiators by arm:

  • Time to event analysis for a) RR-TB treatment initiation; b) smear/culture conversion; and, as applicable, c) HIV treatment initiation; d) HIV viral suppression; and e) AE and SAE symptom resolution.
  • Characterization of provider adherence to guidelines for: a) dosing requirements; b) RR-TB dosing changes based on AE and SAE events; and c) AE and SAE adjuvant medication management strategy.
  • Programmatic cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Cluster Inclusion Criteria:

Primary Care Clinics (PCCs) (i.e., clusters) are eligible if they meet the following:

  • within one of the selected hospital treatment catchment areas in Kwazulu-Natal, Gauteng and Eastern Cape Provinces;
  • willingness of provincial TB program managers and hospital leadership to participate;
  • willingness of PCC nurse manager to participate;
  • diagnosis of 10 or more RR-TB patients per year; and
  • have access to necessary labs, X-ray and electrocardiogram (ECG) equipment.

Participant Inclusion Criteria:

Adult participants aged 18 years of age and older, regardless of HIV status, who have a new RR-TB diagnosis, deemed willing and able to provide informed consent in one of the four most common SA languages [Zulu, Xhosa, Afrikaans, and English] will be eligible.

Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • any clinical presentation requiring hospital admission or, in other words, the participant is not a candidate for outpatient primary care initiation (e.g., severe weakness, confusion, severe mental illness, symptomatic low blood pressure, severe shortness of breath, and temp >39.0);
  • Hemoglobin < 8mg/dL (from National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) or point of care)) or liver disease (ALT > 120 U/L);
  • prolonged QTc>470ms, confirmed by 2 or more ecg;
  • rapid heartrate, tachycardia (HR >140); confirmed after 5 minutes of rest;
  • pregnancy;
  • evidence of extrapulmonary disease;
  • enrolled in another clinical trial that changes BPaL-L regimen, duration or symptom management process.

Treatment and study plan

Nurse-Led Treatment in Primary Care

Other

At a primary care clinic intervention site, a nurse will be available once or twice weekly. The days/times will be dependent on clinic volume (i.e., cluster size), with scheduled rotations between PCCs. This rotation between PCC sites will mimic the physician's responsibilities/availability at a district hospital and creates parity between the trial arms. In this trial, we will have nurses dedicated to the management of RR-TB treatment, yet the volume at each site will not require the presence of a full-time nurse.

Primary outcomes

  1. RR-TB treatment outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

    defined by the WHO will include the following: treatment success - the sum of cure and treatment completion; non-success - composite of each of the following negative outcomes: death, for any reason, while enrolled in RR-TB treatment (all-cause mortality); treatment failure - treatment terminated or need for permanent regimen change of at least two drugs because of: lack of culture conversion, bacterial reversion, worsening resistance profile, adverse events; and loss to follow-up interruption of 2 or more consecutive months of missed treatment.

  2. Severe Adverse Events as assessed by the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) AE grading table

    Time frame: 12 months

    The following will be classified as an SAE using the DAIDS AE grading table for the purposes of this protocol:

    • Lab abnormalities demonstrating grade 3 or higher: Myelosuppression (White blood cells (WBC), Red blood cells (RBC), Platelets); hepatotoxicity (Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin); renal impairment (serum creatinine and creatinine clearance)
    • Peripheral neuropathy, grade 3 or higher
    • QT prolongation (Frederica's QTc), grade 3 or higher
    • New onset seizure, regardless of grade
    • Hospitalization, regardless of identified cause
    • Mortality, regardless of identified cause
    • All grade 4 AEs not listed above as an SAE
  3. Patient associated catastrophic costs

    Time frame: 12 months

    (Costs 20% or more of household income) will be lower in nurse-led treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to RR-TB treatment initiation

    Time frame: 60 days from trial screening

    Time to event analysis between diagnosis and treatment initiation

  2. Time to smear/culture conversion

    Time frame: 120 days after treatment initiation

    Time to event analysis between treatment initiation and smear and culture conversion

  3. Time to HIV treatment initiation

    Time frame: 120 days after treatment initiation

    Time to event analysis between enrollment and Antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation

  4. Time to HIV viral suppression

    Time frame: 6 months

    Time to event analysis between enrollment and HIV viral load < 200 copies

  5. RR-TB dosing changes based on AE and SAE events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Provider appropriately manages RR-TB regimen based on AE and SAE events, as determined by blinded safety review

  6. Time to adverse (AE) and severe (SAE) treatment related adverse event resolution

    Time frame: 12 months

    Time to event analysis for adverse and severe treatment related adverse events

  7. Time to initiation of HIV prevention

    Time frame: 6 months

    Time to event analysis between enrollment and HIV prevention initiation for HIV negative patients

  8. Provider adherence to dosing requirements, treatment initiation

    Time frame: 1 month

    Accuracy of regimen dosing based on treatment guidelines

  9. AE and SAE adjuvant medication management strategy

    Time frame: 12 months

    Provider appropriately manages AE and SAE events, as determined by blinded safety review

  10. Programmatic cost effectiveness evaluation

    Time frame: 12 months

    For the health system costs, we will use standard approaches outlined in "Value TB" costing guidelines for TB interventions. If the costs averted are found to be greater than the cost of the nurse-led PCC so that intervention saves money and is non-inferior, then it can be described as dominating (a more effective, less expensive choice) and it is economically the correct choice. In contrast, if the nurse-led PCC is non-inferior and yet more expensive, then we will calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (i.e., (CostNurse-CostUsual care)/(EffectNurse-EffectUsualCare)) that describes the extra costs necessary for each additional cured case.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kelly Lowensen, MSN, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

4104091372

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  • University of Cape Town
  • University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

Registry information

Official study title

Bring BPaL2Me Trial Comparing Nurse-Led RR-TB Treatment in Primary Care to Physician-Led, Hospital-Based Outpatient RR-TB Treatment: A Cluster Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jan 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Oct 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.