Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06034730

Breathomics: May it Become an Affordable, New Tool for Early Diagnosis and Screening of Lung Cancer?

Breath analysis examining specific patterns of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has been demonstrated to be able to discriminate lung cancer (LC) patients from healthy controls (HC). However, the existing technology uses complex, expensive, and low throughput analytical platforms to give an offline response, thus preventing its applicability for mass screening. The reliability of a new portable device to enable rapid, on-site LC diagnosis is tested.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Azienda Consorziale Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari - Thoracic Surgery Unit

Bari, 70121, Italy

About this study

The breath of patients with histologically proven NSCLC and healthy controls was sampled into Tedlar bags through a Nafion filter and a one-way mouthpiece. The breath samples in the bags were then analyzed by an automated micro portable gas chromatography device developed in-house, which consisted of a thermal desorption tube, thermal injector, separation column, and photoionization detector, as well as other accessories such as pumps, valves, and a helium cartridge. The chromatograms were analyzed by chemometrics and machine learning techniques.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • NSCLC histologically proven (for LC group) at any stage of disease
  • non-cancer controls who had negative findings on preoperative chest X-rays/chest CT scan (for HC groups)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who had any history of another type of cancer
  • who had received neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy because of the possible unknown effects on cancer metabolism
  • pediatric patients.

Treatment and study plan

Portable GC device for brath analysis

Device

Patients were asked to orally exhale 1-2 L breath into a 5 L Tedlar bag via a one-way mouthpiece and Nafion filter for moisture removal, as shown in Figure 1B. The process usually takes about a few minutes. The breath analysis took place either in-situ immediately after the breath sample collection or within 24 h of breath collection. The Tedlar bags were stored under ambient condition until analyzed. During the breath analysis, the Tedlar bag was connected to the sampling port of the portable GC (Figure 1C). Approximately 350 mL of breath was pulled from the Tedlar bag into the GC for analysis. The GC operation was controlled using LabView via a laptop. The total assay time was 30 min, including 5 min of breath sampling time from the Tedlar bag at a flow rate of 70 mL/min (see the blue path in Figure 1A), 5 min of desorption/transfer time, 10 min of chromatographic separation time (see the orange path in Figure 1A), and 10 min of GC system cleaning time.

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in VOCs peaks in patients with lung cancer vs healthy patients

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Identify biomarkers able to discriminate between lung cancer patients and healthy controls.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari

Other

Collaborators

  • Humanitas Hospital, Italy
  • University of Michigan

Registry information

Official study title

Breathomics: May it Become an Affordable, New Tool for Early Diagnosis and Screening of Lung Cancer? An Exploratory Study on a Cohort of 60 Patients

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 13, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.