Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03490110

Brain Markers of Improvements in Cognitive Functioning

Some of the most common, persistent, and disabling consequences of traumatic brain injury affect an individual's ability to achieve personal goals. Interventions that strengthen abilities such as being able to concentrate, remember, stay calm and overcome challenges, could have far reaching benefits for Veterans. One challenge in rehabilitation is that response to training can be highly variable, and a better understanding of the neural bases for this variability could inform care. This pilot project will test the clinical behavioral effects of a cognitive skill training intervention and explore to what extent changes in markers of the brain's electrical activity (using the non-invasive technique of electroencephalograms, EEG) can explain differences in responses to skill training.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) Attention Deficit Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders Brain Diseases Brain Injuries Brain Injuries, Traumatic Central Nervous System Diseases Craniocerebral Trauma Executive Dysfunction Mental Disorders Nervous System Diseases Neurodevelopmental Disorders Stress Trauma, Nervous System Wounds and Injuries

Age range

21 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA

Sacramento, California, 95655, United States

About this study

Detailed Description: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) can impair cognitive functioning long after the initial trauma. Some of the most common, persistent, and disabling consequences of traumatic brain injury are deficits in higher order cognitive functions that direct more basic processes based on an individual's goals. Symptoms such as distractibility and difficulty holding goal-relevant information in memory can affect achievement of personal and professional goals. These cognitive problems can be exacerbated by post-traumatic stress (PTS) symptoms, commonly observed in the Veteran population. Interventions that strengthen goal-directed regulation of cognitive-emotion states could have far reaching benefits for Veterans.

One challenge in rehabilitation is that response to training can be highly variable, and a better understanding of the neural bases for this variability could inform patient care. Investigators have developed a system for training neurocognitive skills that can be used in rehabilitation neuroscience studies to elucidate the neural bases of improvements in cognitive functioning. The training system is designed to help patients improve goal-directed brain state regulation, and preliminary work has investigated brain network parameters that may predict response to training. Electroencephalography (EEG) potentially provides easily accessible markers for the neural bases of improvements with training.

Objectives in this pilot study are to investigate the potential of EEG markers to: (1) explain differential responses to attention regulation training; and (2) predict responses to training.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Veterans
  • History of TBI (as defined by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and VA, with reported plausible mechanism of head injury, loss of consciousness with some period of posttraumatic alteration in cognition), in the chronic, stable phase of recovery (>6 months from injury)
  • On stable psychoactive medications (> 30 days)
  • Able and willing to participate in EEG, training and, assessments

Exclusion criteria

  • Severely apathetic/abulic, aphasic, or other reasons for being unable or unwilling to participate with the training tasks
  • Severe cognitive dysfunction
  • History of neurodevelopmental abnormalities
  • Ongoing illicit drug or alcohol abuse
  • Schizophrenia
  • Bipolar disorder
  • History of other neurological disorders
  • Current medical illnesses that may alter mental status or disrupt participation in the study
  • Active psychotropic medication changes
  • There will be no restriction in regard to gender, race, and socioeconomic status

Treatment and study plan

State regulation skill training

Behavioral

Participants complete seven supervised training sessions. Training sessions last 2 hours, and participants are requested to complete approximately 2.5 hours of additional skill practice over the course of each week outside of session (total ~4.5 hours per week).

Treatment-as-usual

Other

Participants receive clinical care as usual over a matched time period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Score of Attention and Executive Functioning From a Neurocognitive Test Battery

    Time frame: Week 1, before intervention period (baseline)

    The investigators created a composite score based upon standardized performance on the following neurocognitive measures of attention and executive functions: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test - 4th Edition- letter number sequence; Auditory Consonant Trigrams - 9, 18, 36 second conditions; Digit Vigilance Test - Total Errors; Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Color-Word Interference Trials 3 and 4 - Time and Total Errors; & Trails B - Time. Performance on each measure was scored using populations norms, and these scores are then standardized (Z-scored) and averaged to create a composite outcome (the unit measure being Z-score).

    A Z-score reflects the number of standard deviations a given score is away from the population mean: A Z-score of 0 is equal to the population mean, with positive and negative values reflecting performances above and below the population mean, respectively.

  2. Composite Score of Attention and Executive Functioning From a Neurocognitive Test Battery

    Time frame: Week 8, after the intervention period

    The investigators created a composite score based upon standardized performance on the following neurocognitive measures of attention and executive functions: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test - 4th Edition- letter number sequence; Auditory Consonant Trigrams - 9, 18, 36 second conditions; Digit Vigilance Test - Total Errors; Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Color-Word Interference Trials 3 and 4 - Time and Total Errors; & Trails B - Time. Performance on each measure was scored using populations norms, and these scores are then standardized (Z-scored) and averaged to create a composite outcome (the unit measure being Z-score).

    A Z-score reflects the number of standard deviations a given score is away from the population mean: A Z-score of 0 is equal to the population mean, with positive and negative values reflecting performances above and below the population mean, respectively.

    Change will be analyzed for this data as change from before to after the intervention period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Event-Related Potential (ERP) Related to Memory Retrieval (Measured in uV)

    Time frame: Week 8, after the intervention period

    Electroencephalography (EEG) will be collected during tasks that require attention and working memory. The old/new ERP effect (difference between brain responses to correctly remembered studied items vs. correctly rejected unstudied items) will be analyzed for this data as change from before to after the intervention period.

  2. Event-Related Potential (ERP) Related to Memory Retrieval (Measured in uV)

    Time frame: Week 1, before the intervention period

    Electroencephalography (EEG) will be collected during tasks that require attention and working memory. The old/new ERP effect (difference between brain responses to correctly remembered studied items vs. correctly rejected unstudied items) will be analyzed for this data prior to the intervention period.

  3. Network Modularity From EEG

    Time frame: Week 8, after the intervention period

    EEG will be collected during a focused rest condition. Network modularity will be estimated from a matrix of connections between electrodes based on phase coherence, a unit-less measure of correlation between phase angles of EEG signals in the theta (4-8 Hz) frequency range. The modularity metric reflects the strength of modular network organization by summing the difference between the fraction of within-module connections to the total fraction of connections across modules, thus ranging from 0 (random) to 1 (completely modular). Change in network modularity will be analyzed for this data as change from before to after the intervention period.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Collaborators

  • VA Northern California Health Care System

Registry information

Official study title

EEG Markers of Training-Induced Improvements in Cognitive Functioning

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Apr 6, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 23, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.