Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States
NCT Number: NCT04386655
For phase II, the objective is to compare the effectiveness of BICS-T with the well-established BICS in-person group. Information gained from phase I (the feasibility study) was used to make necessary changes to the BICS-T protocol.
The purpose of this study is to provide survivors of brain injury and caregivers greater support and teach adaptive coping strategies, through a designed and studied a coping skills group specifically for brain injury survivors and their caregivers at the Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana (RHI) called the Brain Injury Coping Skills group (BICS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46268, United States
Brain injury can be devastating for both patients and family members and can result in chronic difficulties in vocational, social, financial, as well as physical functioning. The occurrence of emotional and neurobehavioral challenges in individuals with brain injury is also common with research consistently showing links between these challenges and a person's overall rehabilitation outcome. Additionally, family functioning and caregiver well-being has been shown to influence rehabilitation outcome for a survivor after brain injury. In fact, individuals with families and caregivers who receive support and services, as well as learn adaptive coping strategies, are less likely to exhibit these marked levels of psychological distress.
In order to provide patients and caregivers greater support and teach adaptive coping strategies, the authors of this grant designed and studied a coping skills group specifically for brain injury survivors and their caregivers at the Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana (RHI) called the Brain Injury Coping Skills group (BICS). BICS is a 12 session (one session per week), manualized, cognitive-behavioral treatment group designed to provide support, coping skills, and psychoeducation aimed to improve perceived self-efficacy (PSE) and emotional functioning. Perceived self-efficacy is the belief or confidence in one's ability to deal with the challenges related to a specific situation (e.g., brain injury). PSE has been found to be strongly linked to social participation, increased positive regard toward the caregiving role, and was found to be the greatest contributing factor to predicting life satisfaction. Cicerone and Azulay found that the greatest contribution to predicting life satisfaction was the person's PSE for managing their cognitive challenges.
Telemedicine is one possible option for rural patients. With increases in the availability of internet and electronic communication, patients now have immediate access to experts and treatment providers who specialize in brain injury. In fact, results from a needs assessment from Ricker and colleagues in 2002 identified telemedicine as a desired need of the brain injury community. To date, several studies have used telemedicine as an avenue to address brain injury rehabilitation for rural patients and caregivers.
For phase II, the objective is to compare the effectiveness of BICS-T with the well-established BICS in-person group. Information gained from phase I (the feasibility study) was used to make necessary changes to the BICS-T protocol.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
BICS sessions (both in-person and telemedicine) will occur once a week for 12 weeks. Each session will last two hours.
Modules of BICS include: Introduction to Brain Injury, Expectations for Recovery, Tips on Managing Challenging Problems, Learning about Depression after the Brain Injury, The 4 R's of Stress Management, Communicating Effectively with Professionals
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This measure assesses perceived self-efficacy regarding a person's brain injury. Participants respond to each item using a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Items are totaled and higher scores suggest greater perceived self-efficacy.
Time frame: 3 months
the most commonly used group process instrument. It is a self-report, 12-item questionnaire that assesses the person's perceptions of the group's therapeutic environment. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Extremely." The three subscales includes Engagement (the level of positive working group atmosphere), Conflict (the level of anger and tension in the group), and Avoidance (the level of behaviors indicating avoidance of personal responsibility of group work by the members).
Time frame: 3 months
This is a 4-item questionnaire that assesses a person's feelings and perceptions towards the group content and relationships. Items are measured on an analog scale, ranging from 1-10. The four items measure four different aspects of the group environment including: Relationship, Goals, Acceptability, and Overall Fit.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This measures a person's confidence in managing daily activities, emotions, medications/treatments, social interactions, and symptoms. Participants respond to each item using a scale from 1 (I am not at all confident) to 5 (I am very confident). Higher scores suggest higher perceived self-efficacy.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a quality of life measure designed specifically for patients with brain injury. Participants respond to how satisfied they feel about each item using the following scale: 1 (Not at all), 2 (Slightly), 3 (Moderately), 4 (Quite), 5 (Very). Item scores are added and higher scores suggest higher perceived quality of life after brain injury.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty). Higher scores suggest greater physical functioning ability.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Higher scores suggest greater anxiety.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Higher scores suggest greater depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Higher scores suggest greater fatigue.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Higher scores suggest greater sleep disturbance (worse sleep).
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Always) to 5 (Never). Higher scores suggest greater ability to participate in social roles and activities.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate each statement from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). Higher scores suggest greater likelihood that pain is interfering with the participant's every functioning.
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 months
This is a part of an evaluation on a person's overall quality of life based on physical limitations and ability to participate socially. Participants rate their pain on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worse pain imaginable).
Time frame: 3 months
This a 7-point Likert scale for group settings. It measures one's feeling of acceptance in a group setting, as well as sense of belonging, working together, trust, and caring. The scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). Higher scores suggest greater positivity about group acceptance, trust, caring, and working together.
Devan Parrott
Other
Telemedicine Brain Injury Coping Skills (BICS-T) Support Group for Brain Injury Survivors and Caregivers
Acronym: BICS-T-2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04371211
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01287156
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05714150
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04056312
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details