CHUV
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT04632290
In a current first-in-human study, called Stimulation Movement Overground (STIMO, NCT02936453), Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord is applied to enable individuals with chronic severe spinal cord injury (SCI) to complete intensive locomotor neurorehabilitation training. In this clinical feasibility study, it was demonstrated that EES results in an immediate enhancement of walking function, and that when applied repeatedly as part of a neurorehabilitation program, EES can improve leg motor control and trigger neurological recovery in individuals with severe SCI to a certain extent (Wagner et al. 2018).
Preclinical studies showed that linking brain activity to the onset and modulation of spinal cord stimulation protocols not only improves the usability of the stimulation, but also augments neurological recovery. Indeed, rats rapidly learned to modulate their cortical activity in order to adjust the amplitude of spinal cord stimulation protocols. This brain-spine interface allowed them to increase the amplitude of the movement of their otherwise paralyzed legs to climb up a staircase (Bonizzato et al. 2018). Moreover, gait rehabilitation enabled by this brain-spine interface (BSI) augmented plasticity and neurological recovery. When EES was correlated with cortical neuron activity during training, rats showed better recovery than when training was only supported by continuous stimulation (Bonizzato et al. 2018). This concept of brain spine-interface was validated in non-human primates (Capogrosso et al. 2016).
Clinatec (Grenoble, France) has developed a fully implantable electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording device with a 64-channel epidural electrode array capable of recording electrical signals from the motor cortex for an extended period of time and with a high signal to noise ratio the electrical signals from the motor cortex. This ECoG-based system allowed tetraplegic patients to control an exoskeleton (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550522) with up to 8 degrees of freedom for the upper limb control (Benabid et al. 2019). This device was implanted in 2 individuals so far; one of them has been using this system both at the hospital and at home for more than 3 years.
We hypothesize that ECoG-controlled EES in individuals with SCI will establish a direct bridge between the patient's motor intention and the spinal cord below the lesion, which will not only improve or restore voluntary control of leg movements, but will also boost neuroplasticity and neurological recovery when combined with neurorehabilitation.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants are implanted bilaterally with epidural electrocorticography devices. The decoded motor intentions are driving the implanted spinal cord stimulation system. Brain-controlled spinal cord stimulation is used for training and rehabilitation to recover voluntary movements.
ARC-BSI Lumbar System for participants entering the optional extension with system upgrade: replacement of the neurostimulator, and upgrade of the WIMAGINE system and STIMO system wearable devices.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of Adverse Events possibly, probably or causally related to the procedure or device.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of device deficiencies
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 20, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 4, higher scores mean a worst outcome
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 56, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Average step height, step length, amplitude of EMG activity during walking
Time frame: 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Decoding accuracy from 0-100% higher numbers mean a better outome
Time frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Average range of movement, amplitude of EMG activity during upper limb movements
Time frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Power density spectrum of the ECoG signal over each electrode
Time frame: 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation
Amplitude and latency of the cortically evoked potentials
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Other
Acronym: STIMO-BSI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06243952
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05589415
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05218447
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04457206
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details