CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT04157192
Acupuncture has been a means of treating headaches and migraine since 2002 and is now a World Health Organisation-recognized prophylactic treatment for migraine. Brain activation/de-activation via acupuncture modifies the haemodynamic responses in the brain which may impact the sensorial, cognitive and affective dimensions of pain. Randomized studies on patients suffering from aura-free migraine have shown that the painkilling effect of regular acupuncture sessions on the cerebral substratum, compared with simulated sham-type acupuncture, can reduce the frequency of bouts of migraine, number of days with headaches and also their intensity.
Modifications to the white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) occur after repeated sessions of acupuncture treatment for pain and these are observable via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is a very sensitive technique and often used to detect functional and structural brain changes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nîmes, 30029, France
Since 2002, acupuncture has been employed as a method for treating headaches and migraine. It is recognized by the World Health Organisation (WHO), and is now part of the prophylactic treatments for migraine. Brain activations/de-activation via acupuncture lead to a modification of haemodynamic responses in the brain which may impact the sensorial, cognitive and affective dimensions of pain. Randomized studies on patients who suffer from migraine without aura have shown that the painkilling effect of repeated acupuncture sessions on the cerebral substratum, compared with simulated sham-type acupuncture, make it possible to reduce the frequency of bouts of migraine, the number of days of headaches, and the intensity of the bouts.
Following repeated sessions of acupuncture treatment for pain, modifications occur in the white matter (WM) and in the grey matter (GM) and these may be observed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which is a highly sensitive technique and very often used to detect functional brain changes and/or subtle abnormalities.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patient will be treated for migraine with real acupuncture.
Sham acupuncture is used as a control in scientific studies to test the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of various disorders, in this case, migraine. In this study, the subjects will not know whether they are getting true acupuncture or not. In the placebo group, the acupuncture needles will not actually be inserted into the skin. Placebo needles consisting of a sliding tube and a retractible needle are applied to the acupunture reference point (marked by a pastille stuck on the skin). The patient should not be able to feel the difference between real acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - Start of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via acupuncture (Interventional group) is is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: Sixty days after inclusion in the trial (Day 60) - end of therapy
Regional homogeneity in patients treated via simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter of Placebo group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
The mean diffusivity of White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter of Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in the Interventional group patients is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Radial diffusivity of the White Matter in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy of patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0 - start of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with real acupuncture (Interventional group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: 60 days after the initial inclusion visit (Day 60) - end of therapy
Fractional anisotropy in patients treated with simulated, sham-type acupuncture (Placebo group) is computed with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
Time frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
Time frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The number of days with migraine per month will be measured according to the days noted on a calendar
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
Time frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
Time frame: At the end of the study (on Day 90)
The change in pain will be measured according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) described by Huskisson. The VAS is a simple numerical scale for measuring the intensity of pain. It is represented in the form of a 100 mm continuous line ranging from "Absence of pain" (0 mm) to "Maximum Imaginable Pain" (100 mm). The patient slides the cursor to give the intensity of pain that he/she feels. The amount of pain felt will be reported on the migraine calendar.
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
Time frame: At the end of the study on Day 90
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
Time frame: At the inclusion visit (Vinc) on Day 0
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
Time frame: At the end of the study on Day 90
The evolution of the impact of migraine on the patient's Quality of Life (QOL) before and after treatment will be measured on a score of 36 to 78 points by means of the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). This is a tool used to measure the impact of headaches on the patient's ability to function at work, at school, at home and in social situations.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Brain Connectome for Migraine Patients Treated Via Acupuncture: A Randomized, Controlled Study Under Single-blind Conditions, With a Placebo Group and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Acronym: ACU-BRAIN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06409845
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Florence, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03461874
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Milan, Milano, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05903040
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Florence, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04853797
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Glostrup, Region Sjælland, Denmark
View Trial Details