Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03709940

Brain Connectivity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

This study investigates whether a relationship exists between pre-treatment brain characteristics and treatment response in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

King's College London

London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom

About this study

There is a pressing need in psychiatry to offer more individualised treatments, and to improve outcomes from clinical trials. This 'individualised medicine' approach requires the development of biomarkers of treatment response.

60 adults with ADHD are recruited from the Adult ADHD Clinic at the Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

The study is developed over three sessions, two at baseline (DAY 1 and DAY 2) and one after two months of treatment (follow-up).

The first two sessions are conceived as a single-blind non-randomised placebo-controlled cross-over experiment. The first 30 participants enrolled in the study receive a placebo tablet (ascorbic acid 50 mgs) on DAY 1 before the behavioural assessment and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The behavioural assessment and the functional MRI measurements are repeated two days after (DAY 2), under a clinically effective dose (20 mgs) of short-acting methylphenidate (MPH).

The order of the tablets is reverted for the remaining 30 participants to balance any potential expectation and practice effect between the two conditions. Placebo and medication are over-encapsulated with the same red opaque capsules by the pharmacy team. Also, the protocol followed during the two sessions is absolutely identical in respect of timing and tests administered in order to keep the participants blind to the drug condition (medication or placebo).

After the scanning sessions, all the participants receive the same prescription of a long-acting formulation of MPH, according to the clinical guidelines adopted by the Maudsley Hospital. Treatment response is evaluated clinically and behaviourally after 2 months of treatment (follow-up). Pre-treatment brain characteristics are tested as potential predictors (biomarkers) of treatment response.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • males
  • aged 18-45 years old
  • intelligent quotient (IQ) > 70 (as measured by WASI)
  • diagnosis of ADHD confirmed through clinical assessment (Adult ADHD Clinic)
  • non-medicated (stimulant medication-naive or not taking stimulant medication for at least 4 weeks)

Exclusion criteria

  • no other brain disorders other than ADHD
  • no condition precluding MRI scanning (e.g., metallic implants, claustrophobia)

Treatment and study plan

MPH

Drug

Participants undergo behavioural tests and brain scanning twice, once under placebo and once under an acute dose of MPH, before starting long-term treatment with a long-acting formulation of MPH used routinely at the Adult ADHD Clinic.

Other names: Methylphenidate

Primary outcomes

  1. Diffusion imaging-based measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response (i.e. of participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline).

    Time frame: In the month 2-3 following the last scan.

    Diffusion based measurements include specific measures of anatomical connectivity of pathways originating in the frontal lobes, such as the fronto-striatal pathways and the superior longitudinal fasciculus. According to previously published criteria, treatment response is defined as a symptomatic improvement of at least 30%, as measured by participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional connectivity measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response (i.e. of participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline).

    Time frame: In the month 4-5 following the last scan.

    Functional connectivity measurements include the strength of functional connectivity along pathways originating in the frontal lobes, such as the fronto-striatal pathways and the attentive networks. Treatment response is defined as in outcome 1.

  2. Diffusion imaging-based measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response defined by a data-driven approach.

    Time frame: In the month 6-7 following the last scan.

    A categorical approach (data-driven analysis using multivariate k-mean clustering) is used to define treatment response on the basis of clinical and behavioural characteristics at follow-up. Clinical characteristics include participants' performance on adult ADHD rating scale at follow-up as compared to baseline, whereas behavioural characteristics include participants' performance on the Qb test at follow-up as compared to baseline.

  3. Functional connectivity measurements as statistically significant predictors of treatment response as defined by a data-driven approach.

    Time frame: In the month 8-9 following the last scan.

    Treatment response is defined as in outcome 3.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King's College London

Other

Collaborators

  • Shire

Registry information

Official study title

Brain Connectivity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a Biomarker to Predict Treatment Response

Acronym: BCADHD

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 17, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.