Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02596906

Brain and Cognitive Changes After Reasoning Training in Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Individuals aged 55 and older may experience negative effects of cognitive decline. The proposed research seeks to evaluate the benefits of different types of interventions: reasoning training following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and reasoning training following sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on frontal- lobe mediated cognitive measures of executive control in adults with memory complaints, in the absence of dementia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment Cognition Disorders Cognitive Dysfunction Mental Disorders Neurocognitive Disorders

Age range

50 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UTD Center for BrainHealth

Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of reasoning training on individuals with complaints of changes in memory or thinking in the absence of dementia, when combined with transcranial current stimulation (tDCS). The reasoning training being studied is a strategy based program where individuals are taught strategies designed to engage the frontal lobes. Participants will randomly be placed into one of two groups (1) reasoning training following transcranial current stimulation (tDCS) as compared to (2) reasoning training following sham tDCS. The study will be done with adults between the ages of 50 and 80 with consistent memory complaints or lower baseline performance on memory measures. The primary hypothesis is that individuals receiving tDCS prior to brain training will have a stronger response to brain training than those in the sham tDCS group. Response to training will be measured by improved cognitive function and neural changes as measured by neuropsychological testing, MRI, and EEG. MRI will be used to evaluate the impact of reasoning training on brain blood flow, structure and function, and to measure changes in brain energy metabolism and electroencephalogram (EEG) to evaluate intervention outcomes. The reasoning training program will be conducted in small groups at the Center for BrainHealth.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Safely have an MRI
  • Cognitive complaints in the absence of dementia
  • Participate in tasks involving motor abilities such as use of at least one arm and hand
  • Read, speak, and comprehend English
  • 50-80 years of age
  • Comprehend simple instructions, perform tasks, and take part in intervention

Exclusion criteria

  • Not proficient in reading, comprehending, or speaking English
  • Individuals who have any significant health, neurological, or psychiatric illness, or history of substance abuse
  • Individuals with any MR contraindications (i.e., non-removable metal within/on the body)
  • Individuals taking medications which are contraindicatory for the tDCS procedure
  • Individuals who are left-handed
  • Not proficient in reading,comprehending, and speaking English
  • Females who are not post-menopausal
  • Pre-existing cerebral palsy, autism, epilepsy, schizophrenia, pervasive developmental disorder, thyroid diseases, diabetes, claustrophobia, non-correctable vision problems, major depression, psychosis, active behavioral disorder, or uncontrolled epilepsy.
  • Women who are pregnant

Treatment and study plan

tDCS

Device

Prior to the reasoning training, participants will undergo tDCS. Participants will receive 20 minutes of tDCS using 2mA or less targeting the inferior frontal gyrus prior to each of their 8 reasoning training sessions for a total of 160 total combined minutes. This time does not include set up time which should take no more than 5 minutes. A brief engaging film is shown to participants during the 20 minute session.

Sham tDCS

Device

For the sham tDCS group, the device will be turned off after 30s. The only reported sensations from tDCS is an itching or a tingling when the device turns on but disappears quickly. Thus, those receiving sham tDCS will be unaware that the device has turned off, and will experience an initial tingling similar to that received in the tDCS group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in California Verbal Learning Task Score

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks and 3 months post-training

    To examine short-term and long-term effects of treatment on cognition and real-life outcomes. The participant will undergo neuropsychological testing at baseline, post-training (4 weeks), as well as 3-months post-training.

    Scores on the scale range from 0 to 16 on the California Verbal Learning Task. Higher the values are better their memory.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Regional Brain Blood Flow Change Immediately After 1 Month of Cognitive Training and tDCS Brain Stimulation

    Time frame: Two longitudinal measurements at baseline and 1-month

    Non-invasive estimation of rCBF by perfusion maps using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) MRI. rCBF is quantified as mL/min/100g tissue.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas at Dallas

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Brain and Cognitive Changes After Reasoning Training in Individuals With Cognitive Complaints

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 4, 2015
Registry last updated
Oct 30, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.