Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04287088

bpMRI and Risk Based Shared Clinical Decision Making in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

The shortcoming of the pre-biopsy prostate MRI approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation.

The trial will enrol 600 patients. The primary outcome measure is the the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline. Eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Although most of the prostate cancers (PCas) are currently being diagnosed at early stage, at present, 30% of men are diagnosed with primarily metastatic disease. The need for better diagnostic methods is, therefore, warranted. Recent studies have shown that an alternative pathway using multiparametric (mpMRI) or biparametric (bpMRI) magnetic resonance imaging as a triage test reduces unnecessary biopsies, decreases the detection of clinically non-significant PCa (non-SPCa), and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa). In addition, based on these trials, also EAU guideline was updated to recommend that all men should undergo pre-biopsy mpMRI. However, shortcoming of the approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation.

The trial will enrol 600 patients from four hospital districts: Varsinais-Suomi, Satakunta, Pirkanmaa and Keski-Suomi. Key inclusion criteria are suspicion of prostate cancer based on elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Men with previous PCa diagnosis and contraindications for MRI are excluded. The primary outcome measure is the comparison of the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline.

Using PSA as strata, eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. After randomisation MRI examination is performed and interpreted by one experienced uro-radiologist using Likert and PI-RADS2.1 classifications. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation. Men with negative biopsies or with no biopsies performed are all assigned for five-year follow-up with semi-annual PSA. Long-term follow-up based on health records and national registries is performed for additional 15 years for all patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18 years or older
  • Language spoken: Finnish
  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer, based on: serum level of PSA from 2,5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml and/or abnormal digital rectal examination according to the referral physician
  • Mental status: Patients must be able to understand the meaning of the study
  • Informed consent: The patient must sign the appropriate Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent documents in the presence of the designated staff

Exclusion criteria

  • previous diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • any contraindications for MRI
  • any other conditions that might compromise patient's safety, based on the clinical judgment of the responsible urologist
  • bilateral hip prosthesis

Treatment and study plan

A shared decision making

Diagnostic Test

Based on prostate cancer risk calculation (age, usage of 5-ARI medication, baseline PSA, IMPROD bpMRI Likert, prostate volume) a shared decision making whether to perform prostate biopsies or not

Primary outcomes

  1. Gleason 4+3=7 prostate cancer, baseline

    Time frame: baseline

    The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [ISUP grade group, the GGG, 3]) prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gleason 3+4=7 or lower prostate cancer, baseline

    Time frame: baseline

    The proportion of men with clinically non-significant prostate cancer and intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3 [GGG 1], and Gleason 3+4 [GGG 2]) and benign biopsies in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway

  2. Men undergoing biopsies

    Time frame: baseline

    The proportion of men undergoing biopsies in the control and intervention arms

  3. Biopsy related complications

    Time frame: baseline

    The proportion of men having biopsy-related complications in the control and intervention arms

  4. Gleason 4+3=7 prostate cancer, follow-up

    Time frame: during the five years of follow-up

    The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [GGG 3], prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms during the five years of follow-up

  5. the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer -questionnaire (MAX-PC)

    Time frame: baseline, 6months, 12months

    Total score in MAX-PC in the control and intervention arms. Score range: 0-54. Higher scores in MAX-PC denote higher anxiety.

  6. Biopsy probability

    Time frame: baseline

    The probability of performing biopsy in experimental arm

Other outcomes

  1. Biopsy criteria outcome

    Time frame: baseline

    The number of biopsies and the number of clinically significant prostate cancer detected for each biopsy criteria

  2. Calibration of the model

    Time frame: Baseline

    Calibration of the model using both Likert and PI-RADS2.1 criteria

  3. Calibration of the model using biomarkers

    Time frame: Baseline

    Calibration of the model using biomarkers such as the four kallikrein panel

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Otto Ettala, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

023130000 ext. 358

Peter Boström, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

023130000 ext. 358

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Turku University Hospital

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Central Finland Hospital District
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Mount Sinai Hospital, New York
  • Satakunta Central Hospital
  • Tampere University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer - A Multi-centre Trial on Clinical Utility of IMPROD bpMRI in a Shared Decision Making Setting

Acronym: multiIMPROD2

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2041
First posted
Feb 27, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 23, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.