A shared decision making
Diagnostic TestBased on prostate cancer risk calculation (age, usage of 5-ARI medication, baseline PSA, IMPROD bpMRI Likert, prostate volume) a shared decision making whether to perform prostate biopsies or not
NCT Number: NCT04287088
The shortcoming of the pre-biopsy prostate MRI approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation.
The trial will enrol 600 patients. The primary outcome measure is the the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline. Eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
Although most of the prostate cancers (PCas) are currently being diagnosed at early stage, at present, 30% of men are diagnosed with primarily metastatic disease. The need for better diagnostic methods is, therefore, warranted. Recent studies have shown that an alternative pathway using multiparametric (mpMRI) or biparametric (bpMRI) magnetic resonance imaging as a triage test reduces unnecessary biopsies, decreases the detection of clinically non-significant PCa (non-SPCa), and improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (CSPCa). In addition, based on these trials, also EAU guideline was updated to recommend that all men should undergo pre-biopsy mpMRI. However, shortcoming of the approach is the recommendation to biopsy all men post-MRI even if there is no lesion seen in MRI, ie. risk of PCa is very low. Therefore, the primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to compare if there is a difference between significant cancer detection rate in men undergoing prostate biopsies after MRI scan compared to men undergoing post-MRI prostate biopsies only after a shared decision-making based on prostate cancer risk estimation.
The trial will enrol 600 patients from four hospital districts: Varsinais-Suomi, Satakunta, Pirkanmaa and Keski-Suomi. Key inclusion criteria are suspicion of prostate cancer based on elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. Men with previous PCa diagnosis and contraindications for MRI are excluded. The primary outcome measure is the comparison of the proportion of men with CSPCa (Gleason 4+3 prostate cancer or higher) between the control and intervention arms at baseline.
Using PSA as strata, eligible men are randomised 1:1 in two groups. After randomisation MRI examination is performed and interpreted by one experienced uro-radiologist using Likert and PI-RADS2.1 classifications. In control arm in all men prostate biopsies are performed after MRI whereas in intervention arm prostate biopsies are performed only after a shared decision-making between urologist and the patient and the discussion is based on risk estimation. Men with negative biopsies or with no biopsies performed are all assigned for five-year follow-up with semi-annual PSA. Long-term follow-up based on health records and national registries is performed for additional 15 years for all patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Based on prostate cancer risk calculation (age, usage of 5-ARI medication, baseline PSA, IMPROD bpMRI Likert, prostate volume) a shared decision making whether to perform prostate biopsies or not
Time frame: baseline
The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [ISUP grade group, the GGG, 3]) prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway
Time frame: baseline
The proportion of men with clinically non-significant prostate cancer and intermediate risk prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3 [GGG 1], and Gleason 3+4 [GGG 2]) and benign biopsies in the control and intervention arms after primary diagnostic pathway
Time frame: baseline
The proportion of men undergoing biopsies in the control and intervention arms
Time frame: baseline
The proportion of men having biopsy-related complications in the control and intervention arms
Time frame: during the five years of follow-up
The proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 4+3 [GGG 3], prostate cancer or higher) in the control and intervention arms during the five years of follow-up
Time frame: baseline, 6months, 12months
Total score in MAX-PC in the control and intervention arms. Score range: 0-54. Higher scores in MAX-PC denote higher anxiety.
Time frame: baseline
The probability of performing biopsy in experimental arm
Time frame: baseline
The number of biopsies and the number of clinically significant prostate cancer detected for each biopsy criteria
Time frame: Baseline
Calibration of the model using both Likert and PI-RADS2.1 criteria
Time frame: Baseline
Calibration of the model using biomarkers such as the four kallikrein panel
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Turku University Hospital
Other Gov
Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men With Suspicion of Prostate Cancer - A Multi-centre Trial on Clinical Utility of IMPROD bpMRI in a Shared Decision Making Setting
Acronym: multiIMPROD2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06625970
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Brest, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06954337
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02960022
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07005154
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details