Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07351721

Borrelia Arthritis - a Hidden Cause of Arthritis in Danish Patients?

Why is this study being done? Borrelia arthritis is a joint infection caused by Borrelia bacteria transmitted by tick bites. It often affects the knee and can cause prolonged pain and swelling if not diagnosed and treated in time. While well recognized in North America, Borrelia arthritis is considered rare in Europe. Recent findings from the investigators in Denmark suggest it may be more common than previously thought and frequently diagnosed late.

The aim of this study is to improve knowledge about how often Borrelia arthritis occurs in Denmark, how it presents, how long diagnosis takes, and how patients recover. This may help ensure faster diagnosis and better treatment for future patients.

Who can take part? Patients referred to an including rheumatology department with inflammation in one or a few joints (mono- or oligoarthritis) may be invited to participate.

What does participation involve?

If a patient choose to participate:

* A blood sample will be taken to test for antibodies against Borrelia. * Fluid from the affected joint(s) will be tested for Borrelia DNA. * Blood and joint fluid samples will be stored in a secure research biobank for future analyses related to this study. * The patient will complete a questionnaire about symptoms, health history, possible tick exposure, and the diagnostic process. * Relevant information from the patients medical record (tests, treatments, and outcomes) will be collected.

All procedures are part of standard clinical care or involve minimal additional testing.

How will the information be used?

The study will investigate:

* How common Borrelia arthritis is among patients with joint inflammation in Denmark. * Differences in symptoms, test results, diagnostic delays, treatment, and outcomes between patients with Borrelia arthritis and other forms of arthritis.

Risks and benefits Risks are minimal and mainly related to routine blood sampling and joint aspiration. The patient may not benefit directly, but the results may improve care for future patients.

Confidentiality and voluntary participation All personal data will be handled confidentially according to data protection regulations. Participation is voluntary, and patients may withdraw at any time without affecting their medical care.

Study period The study runs from January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027 and includes patients from eight hospitals in Denmark.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Introduction Borrelia arthritis is, despite being a painful and debilitating disease, barely studied in Europe. The investigating research group has discovered an alarming number of cases in the last few years, and believe Borrelia arthritis is underdiagnosed in Denmark. This project therefore aims to systematically investigate the prevalence and trajectory of Borrelia arthritis in Denmark, in order to enhance the diagnostic capabilities, to improve outcomes for future patients, as well as reduce the costs for the Danish health care system.

Background Clinical aspect & outcome of Borrelia arthritis. Borrelia arthritis is a joint infection caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria group. Patients with Borrelia arthritis typically present months after tick exposure, most commonly with monoarthritis of the knee, although oligoarthritis can occur. Diagnosing Borrelia arthritis has been a challenge, based solely on patient history and the presence of Borrelia IgG antibodies in plasma. Tools like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of synovial fluid provide better diagnostic accuracy, but are not readily available. Though antibiotic therapy relieves symptoms in most cases, Borrelia bacteria within the joint can activate the immune system leading to persistent synovial inflammation. In these patients, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are required, and recovery may take months to years, with risk of lasting pain and disability.

Distribution & prevalence. In North America, Borrelia arthritis is found in 30% of Lyme borreliosis cases, whereas in Europe, it is considered rare. This discrepancy is attributed to differences in Borrelia species and their tissue tropism: European species tend to primarily affect the skin and nervous system, while American species more commonly target the joints. Current knowledge on European Borrelia arthritis epidemiology and outcomes is limited, but it is thought to present with subtler symptoms than in North America, potentially leading to overlooked cases. A French cohort study reported a median delay of 5 months from symptom onset to diagnosis, and found several Borrelia-species involved. Few studies have been conducted in Scandinavia. In Southern Norway a study found the Borrelia arthritis incidence to be 2.7/100,000 adults, while it was 2.3% in a high-endemic area of Sweden. In Denmark, a registry study in the Capital Region found that 4 of 146 patients with Borrelia antibodies had a possible Borrelia arthritis.

Current status in Denmark. Since 2021, the investigators research group has identified multiple patients with Borrelia arthritis from a specific area (Marbæk plantage) near Esbjerg. This indicates an emerging Borrelia-hotspot in this area, possibly an effect of climatic changes on the distribution of Borrelia host animals and tick abundance. Initially, Borrelia arthritis was not suspected in these cases, but as awareness of the disease increased, the diagnostic delay was reduced: from 38 months in the first patient to six weeks in the most recent one. With heightened attention on the condition and with the availability of improved diagnostic tools, more than 50 additional cases of Borrelia arthritis from other regions of Denmark have been identified since 2023. The high positive sample rate of 49% (25 of 51 patients tested so far in 2025) suggests undertesting and overlooked cases.

Aim. More knowledge regarding the incidence and clinical features of Borrelia arthritis in Denmark is needed, to ensure a timely and appropriate diagnosis and treatment, thereby reducing risk of complications for affected patients in the future. With this project, the aim is to determine the incidence of Borrelia arthritis in patients with mono/oligoarthritis across all Danish regions, to characterize the clinical presentation of Borrelia Arthritis in Northern European patients, and to determine if the Borrelia-species involved belong to genotypes associated with Borrelia arthritis in North America or the more common European types.

Hypotheses. The investigators hypothesise that Borrelia arthritis is an underrecognised infection in Denmark, and that Borrelia arthritis has a favourable prognosis compared with other causes of mono/oligoarthritis, that Borrelia arthritis is an emerging infection in Northern Europe due to climate changes favoring tick survival, and that the Borrelia genotypes responsible for Northern European Borrelia arthritis differ from Northern American strains.

Methods Sub-study 1 - Borrelia arthritis incidence & outcome study: To establish the number of Borrelia arthritis cases, all patients presenting with mono/oligoarthritis at the Departments of Rheumatology at eight hospitals across Denmark will be tested prospectively with a serum-Borrelia IgG antibody test from 1.1.26 until 31.12.27. All patients will have their synovial fluid tested for B.burgdorferi DNA by PCR and sampled blood and synovial fluid tested for intrasynovial synthesis of B.burgdorferi antibodies. A biobank will be established at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, OUH, containing blood and synovial fluid. Around 25 patients from each of the eight sites are expected to be included yearly, in all 350-400 patients in two years. A RedCap database will be established including data on 1-year arthritis outcomes where the patients with Borrelia arthritis and patients with arthritis of other origin will be compared.

Sub-study 2 - Borrelia arthritis characterisation study: A questionnaire for all patients included in Study 1 will be designed. The RedCap database will include data from the questionnaire and from patient charts; demographic information, clinical history (symptom debut, affected joints), course of disease (fluctuating, stable or progressing arthritis, pain, fever, other symptoms, and comorbidities), tick exposure history, diagnostic pathway (health professionals involved), diagnostic test results (joint fluid (WBC count, direct microscopy, culture, PCR), blood tests (Borrelia antibody status, hematology, inflammatory markers, uric acid, autoantibodies), final diagnosis and treatment (pain medicine, anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics). The investigators will compare the Borrelia arthritis patients (cases) with the arthritis patients without Borrelia (control group) in terms of tick-bite history and exposure, symptoms and paraclinical data through statistical analyses.

Expected impact. The primary expected outcome is an improved understanding of the occurence, clinical characteristics, and microbiological profile of Borrelia arthritis. By collecting comprehensive data on diagnostic pathways and outcomes, the research will provide insights into the challenges faced by Borrelia arthritis patients, especially in the context of delayed diagnoses. The study's findings will inform targeted interventions, including the development of more efficient diagnostic protocols and increased awareness among healthcare providers regarding symptoms and diagnostic markers of Borrelia arthritis. Additionally, the establishment of a biobank will facilitate future research into the disease's pathophysiology and guide the development of tailored treatment strategies. Ultimately, the study could lead to the establishment of public health initiatives aimed at better prevention, early detection, and management of Borrelia arthritis in Denmark.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ≥ 18 years old
  • Presenting with mono/oligoarthritis at one of the including Departments of Rheumatology between 1/1-26 and 31/12-27
  • Danish abilities to read and consent to inclusion
  • Oral and written consent including biobank

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnoses of other inflammatory arthritis in relation to current arthritis episode (gout, pseudo-gout, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, peripheral spondyloarthritis)

Treatment and study plan

Synovial fluid Borrelia burgdorferi PCR

Diagnostic Test

All patients will have a pan-Borrelia burgdorferi PCR performed on synovial fluid from joints with arthritis. The PCR-positive patients will be deemed to have Borrelia arthritis, all other patients will be deemed as not having Borrelia arthritis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Sub-study 1: 1-year cure rate Borrelia arthritis vs. control group

    Time frame: 1 year after inclusion

    Number of patients recovered drug-free (antibiotic treatment and/or DMARDs) one year after inclusion, in the Borrelia arthritis group and in the control group. Difference between the groups.

  2. Sub-study 2: Serum-Borrelia IgG antibodies

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Statistical difference between the 2 groups (Borrelia arthritis vs. control group) at baseline of number of patients with a serum-Borrelia IgG antibody.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sub-study 1: Borrelia arthritis incidence and Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Proportion of all included patients with a Bb PCR positive joint fluid, and classification of the B. burgdorferi strains found in synovial fluid of patients with Borrelia arthritis.

  2. Sub-study 1: 6-month cure rate Borrelia arthritis vs. control group

    Time frame: 6 months after study inclusion

    Number of patients recovered drug-free (antibiotic treatment and/or DMARDs) six months after inclusion, in the Borrelia arthritis group and in the control group. Difference between the groups.

  3. Sub-study 2: Difference between groups in which joints are affected

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Statistical difference between the two groups at baseline in joints involved (knee, ankle, hip, shoulder, elbow, other) and number of joints involved (1, 2, 3 or more)

  4. Sub-study 2: Difference between groups in amount of synovial fluid.

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Statistical difference between the two groups at baseline in estimated ml of synovial fluid in ml in affected joints

Other outcomes

  1. Age

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference ibetween the 2 groups in median age at date of inclusion

  2. Sex

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference between the 2 groups in % male sex.

  3. Number of tick-bites 1 year

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference in the 2 groups between number of tick-bites in the last year up to date of inclusion

  4. Number of tick-bites last 5 years

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference in the 2 groups between number of tick-bites in the last year and in the last 5 years leading up to inclusion.

  5. Tick-bite risk behaviour

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference in the 2 groups in number of patients with risk behaviour (hiking, hunting, scouts, orienteers, golfing, extensive gardening)

  6. Arthritis presentation

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference between the 2 groups in arthritis presentation (continuous or relapsing/remitting).

  7. DAS 28 score

    Time frame: At study inclusion and again at 6 month follow-up control and 1 year follow-up control

    Difference between the 2 groups in calculated DAS 28 score. Calculated from the following variables: Tender Joint Count 28 score, Swollen Joint Count 28 score, C-reactive protein (mg/L) and Global VAS score (score from 0-100) with this calculation: (0.56*sqrt([tj_count])) + (0.28*sqrt([sj_count])) + (0.014*[global_vas]) + (0.36*log([crp] + 1)) + 0.96

  8. BMI

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference between the 2 groups in Body Mass Index, calculated by (Weight in kg / (Height in cm)²) x 10,000

  9. Comorbidities

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Differences in comorbidities in the last 5 years before study inclusion, using the Charlson comorbidity index, with following groups; score of 0, score of 1, score of 2, and score of >2.

  10. BRAF score

    Time frame: At study inclusion and again at 6 months and 1 year follow up.

    Differences between the groups in BRAF score, testing for fatigue.

  11. Anti-CCP

    Time frame: at study inclusion

    Difference between groups in number of patients with a positive (5-15 kU/L) or highly positive (>15 kU/L) S- anti-cyclic citrullinated protein (kU/L)

  12. Rheumatoid factor

    Time frame: At study inclusion

    Difference between the 2 groups in number of patients with a positive S-Rheumatoid factor

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Fredrikke C Knudtzen, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

004529178083

Philip R Lage-Hansen, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

004579182000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fredrikke Christie Knudtzen

Other

Collaborators

  • Aalborg University Hospital
  • Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
  • Frederiksberg University Hospital
  • Gødstrup Hospital
  • Odense University Hospital
  • Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
  • Slagelse Hospital
  • Vejle Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Borrelia Arthritis - a Hidden Cause of Arthritis in Danish Patients? Sub-study 1:Incidence&Outcomes Sub-study 2:Characterisation

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.