Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Anthony E Peters, MD
CONTACT
Anthony E Peters, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kimberly Kennedy, MS
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07413198
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a major public health burden that is both growing rapidly and has few effective therapies. Supervised exercise training (SET) is one of the few effective therapies for older patients with HFpEF, but is currently constrained by cost, resource limitations, and sub-optimal short and long-term clinical response. The objective is to develop and test novel strategies to augment the therapy of exercise training to optimize response and resource utilization in older patients with HFpEF.
Interested in participating?
Request Info55 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Anthony E Peters, MD
CONTACT
Anthony E Peters, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kimberly Kennedy, MS
CONTACT
The hypothesis is that enhancing Supervised exercise training (SET) with a group-mediated behavioral approach and remote activity-monitoring will enable more robust behavioral changes in physical activity at lower cost. To test this hypothesis, the study will recruit patients with Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and assign to 2 sequential groups/waves for trainer-guided, aerobic-based exercise and group counseling sessions, with iterative refinements between waves.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group-mediated educational sessions, individual coaching contacts, group exercise sessions, and home-based self-guided exercise - Groups will engage in this iterative, trainer-guided, in-person, aerobic-based exercise and group counseling sessions approximately 2 times/week for 12 weeks.
Other names: behavioral, coaching, and exercise
Time frame: Baseline
Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question. This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
Time frame: Week 4
Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question. This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
Time frame: Week 12
Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question. This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates how participants determine benefits of and barriers to participating in exercise.
Time frame: Week 4
Evaluates how participants determine benefits of and barriers to participating in exercise.
Time frame: Week 12
Evaluates how participants determine benefits of and barriers to participating in exercise.
Time frame: Baseline
scores from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better health
Time frame: Week 4
scores from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better health
Time frame: Week 12
scores from 0-100, where higher scores indicate better health
Time frame: Baseline
Number of daily steps recorded for 1 week
Time frame: Week 4
Number of daily steps recorded for 1 week
Time frame: Week 12
Number of daily steps recorded for 1 week
Time frame: Baseline
measures functional capacity by the distance walked in 6 minutes, indicating disease severity, prognosis, and treatment response, especially in cardiopulmonary conditions like COPD or heart failure shorter distances (e.g., <350m) often signaling higher mortality risk, while significant changes (e.g., >50m) suggest clinical improvement or decline, though interpretation always needs clinical context and comparison to age/gender norms.
Time frame: Week 4
measures functional capacity by the distance walked in 6 minutes, indicating disease severity, prognosis, and treatment response, especially in cardiopulmonary conditions like COPD or heart failure shorter distances (e.g., <350m) often signaling higher mortality risk, while significant changes (e.g., >50m) suggest clinical improvement or decline, though interpretation always needs clinical context and comparison to age/gender norms.
Time frame: Week 12
measures functional capacity by the distance walked in 6 minutes, indicating disease severity, prognosis, and treatment response, especially in cardiopulmonary conditions like COPD or heart failure shorter distances (e.g., <350m) often signaling higher mortality risk, while significant changes (e.g., >50m) suggest clinical improvement or decline, though interpretation always needs clinical context and comparison to age/gender norms.
Time frame: Baseline
The SPPB is a measure of physical function that incorporates three components: usual gait speed measured over 4 meters, timed repeated chair rise, and standing balance with progressively narrow base of support. Each component is scored on a 0-4 scale and then summed to provide an overall score range of 0-12 - scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 12 (best).
Time frame: Week 4
The SPPB is a measure of physical function that incorporates three components: usual gait speed measured over 4 meters, timed repeated chair rise, and standing balance with progressively narrow base of support. Each component is scored on a 0-4 scale and then summed to provide an overall score range of 0-12 - scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 12 (best).
Time frame: Week 12
The SPPB is a measure of physical function that incorporates three components: usual gait speed measured over 4 meters, timed repeated chair rise, and standing balance with progressively narrow base of support. Each component is scored on a 0-4 scale and then summed to provide an overall score range of 0-12 - scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 12 (best).
Time frame: Baseline
Low handgrip strength, a key indicator in sarcopenia, is often defined as <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women (based on AWGS19) or even lower, depending on the study, such as <26 kg and <16 kg.
Time frame: Week 4
Low handgrip strength, a key indicator in sarcopenia, is often defined as <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women (based on AWGS19) or even lower, depending on the study, such as <26 kg and <16 kg.
Time frame: Week 12
Low handgrip strength, a key indicator in sarcopenia, is often defined as <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women (based on AWGS19) or even lower, depending on the study, such as <26 kg and <16 kg.
Time frame: Baseline
Evaluates how your heart, lungs, and muscles work together during physical exertion, using a treadmill or bike while monitoring breathing (mask), heart activity (ECG), and vitals (blood pressure) to diagnose causes of shortness of breath, assess heart/lung conditions like heart failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and determine exercise capacity, offering a comprehensive view of cardiovascular and respiratory fitness.
Normal values typically range from 35 to 40 mL/kg/min for healthy middle-aged individuals, with variations based on age, sex, and training status.
Time frame: Week 12
Evaluates how your heart, lungs, and muscles work together during physical exertion, using a treadmill or bike while monitoring breathing (mask), heart activity (ECG), and vitals (blood pressure) to diagnose causes of shortness of breath, assess heart/lung conditions like heart failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and determine exercise capacity, offering a comprehensive view of cardiovascular and respiratory fitness.
Normal values typically range from 35 to 40 mL/kg/min for healthy middle-aged individuals, with variations based on age, sex, and training status.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Anthony E Peters, MD
CONTACT
Kimberly Kennedy, MS
CONTACT
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
A Novel, Group-mediated Exercise Intervention With Remote Activity Monitoring in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Acronym: HFpEF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06081543
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07214376
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Houma, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07037459
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05064709
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diastolic Heart Failure
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details