Northern Orthopaedic Division, Klinik Farsoe, Aalborg University Hospital
Farsø, Northern Jutland, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT00159497
This study was designed to investigate the influence of HA-coating on bone remodeling around the cup in cementless THA.
100 patients gave informed consent to participate in a controlled randomized study between porous coated Trilogy® versus Trilogy Calcicoat®. The cup was inserted in press-fit fixation. The femoral component was a cementless porous coated titanium alloy stem (Bi-Metric®), with a modular 28 mm CrCo head. Effect parameters were Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) determined by DEXA scanning.
Measurements revealed no difference between the two groups after 3 years, neither in clinical outcome nor in terms of periprosthetic bone density. Patients with Body Mass Index above normal regained more bone mineral than patients with normal weight. This finding supports the assumption that load is beneficial to bone remodeling. Advantages of better sealing of the bone-prosthesis interface, preventing polyethylene induced osteolysis, may still be anticipated for the 7 or 12 year follow-up examinations
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Farsø, Northern Jutland, Denmark
This study was designed to investigate the influence of HA-coating on bone remodeling around the cup in cementless THA.
100 patients gave informed consent to participate in a controlled randomized study between porous coated Trilogy® versus Trilogy Calcicoat®. The cup was inserted in press-fit fixation. The femoral component was a cementless porous coated titanium alloy stem (Bi-Metric®), with a modular 28 mm CrCo head. Effect parameters were Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) determined by DEXA scanning.
Measurements revealed no difference between the two groups after 3 years, neither in clinical outcome nor in terms of periprosthetic bone density. Patients with Body Mass Index above normal regained more bone mineral than patients with normal weight. This finding supports the assumption that load is beneficial to bone remodeling. Advantages of better sealing of the bone-prosthesis interface, preventing polyethylene induced osteolysis, may still be anticipated for the 7 or 12 year follow-up examinations
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
THA
Other names: Zimmer
THA
Other names: Zimmer
Time frame: 8-12 years
Time frame: 8-12 years
Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06282666
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Lublin, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03809962
Arthritis, Coxarthrosis
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04317872
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis of Hip
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04623073
Arthritis, Coxarthrosis
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial Details