BMT-CARE
BehavioralTherapist-delivered psychosocial intervention comprised of 6 sessions
NCT Number: NCT06472089
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether a psychological intervention (BMT-CARE) is effective at improving the quality of life in caregivers and patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplant compared to usual care, and to identify critical facilitators and barriers for BMT-CARE implementation and adoption.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Alabama at Brimingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
This is a randomized clinical trial to determine whether a psychosocial intervention (BMT-CARE) is effective at improving the quality of life and reducing psychosocial distress of caregivers and patients treated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The BMT-CARE intervention was developed with the goal of improving the experience and needs of caregivers of patients treated with HCT.
Caregivers will be randomized into one of the two study groups: BMT-CARE plus usual care, or usual care.
Participation in this study is expected to last up to 180 days after HCT.
Investigators expect that about 400 caregivers and up to 400 patients treated with HCT will take part in this research study.
The National Institutes of Health is supporting this research by providing funding.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Therapist-delivered psychosocial intervention comprised of 6 sessions
Meeting a transplant social worker prior to HCT and as needed for extra visits
Time frame: Up to 60 days post-HCT
Compare caregiver QOL as measured by the CARGOQOL between the two study groups. The CARGOQOL ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better QOL
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare caregiver QOL as measured by the CARGOQOL between the two study groups. The CARGOQOL ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better QOL
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare caregiving burden as measured by the CRA between the two study groups. The CRA ranges from 24-120 with higher scores indicating greater caregiving burden
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare caregiver depression symptoms as measured by the HADS-Depression between the study groups. The HADS-Depression ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare caregiver anxiety symptoms as measured by the HADS-Anxiety between the study groups. The HADS-Anxiety ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Time frame: Up to 180 days post HCT
Compare caregiver coping as measured by the MOCS-A between the two study groups. The scale ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating higher coping skills
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare caregiver self-efficacy as measured by the CASE-t between the two study groups. The scale ranges from 0-170 with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare patient QOL as measured by the FACT-BMT between the two study groups. Score range 0-196 and higher scores indicate better QOL
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare patient depression symptoms as measured by the HADS-Depression between the study groups. The HADS-Depression ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
Time frame: Up to 180 days post-HCT
Compare patient anxiety symptoms as measured by the HADS-Anxiety between the study groups. The HADS-Anxiety ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
Time frame: Up to 60 days post-HCT
Compare patient symptom burden as measured by the ESAS-r between the study groups. Scor range 0-100 and higher scores indicate worse symptom burden.
Time frame: Up to 180 days post HCT
Compare patient medication adherence as measured by the MARS-5 between study groups. Score range 5-25 with higher scors indicating better adherence.
Time frame: At 180 days post HCT
Compare Rates of caregiver healthcare utilization (e.g., hospitalizations, emergency department visits) between study groups.
Time frame: At 180 days post HCT
Compare rates of caregiver adherence to primary care visits and age-appropriate cancer screening between study groups
Time frame: At day 180 post HCT
Compare rates of caregiver mental health resource utilization between study groups
Time frame: At 180 days post HCT
Compare rates of patient healthcare utilization (eg., hospitalizations, emergency department visits) between the study groups.
Time frame: At day 180 post HCT
Compare rates of patient mental health resource utilization between study groups
Time frame: At day 180 post HCT
Compare the rates of acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease between study groups
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Areej El-Jawahri, MD
CONTACT
Jamie Jacobs, PhD
CONTACT
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
Multimodal Psychosocial Intervention for Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Acronym: BMT-CARE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06910969
Bone Marrow Transplant Complications, Graft vs Host Disease
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06416761
ADPKD, AKI
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05709912
Bone Marrow Transplant Complications, Hematologic Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03818334
Bone Marrow Transplant Complications, Engraft Failure
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details