Dapagliflozin
DrugTablets, Oral, 1 mg, Once daily, 14 days
NCT Number: NCT01498185
To obtain safety and tolerability information in patients with type 1 diabetes where Dapagliflozin is added on to Insulin (for 14 days)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Profil Institute For Clinical Research, Inc., Chula Vista, California, United States
Study Classification : Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, Once daily, 14 days
Tablets, Oral, 0 mg, Once daily, 14 days
Time frame: From Baseline to Day 7
7-PGM was measured as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the assessment on Day -1, prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. 7-PGM included the average of all available glucose values before and 2-hour (hr) after each meal (breakfast, lunch, dinner) as well as bedtime. Measurements were on Day -1, and Day 7 in the double-blind period.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The Cmax was recorded directly from experimental observations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The Tmax was recorded directly from experimental observations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The concentrations below the lower limit of quantitation (<LLOQ) were set as "missing" for the calculation of PK parameters as well as summary statistics. AUC[TAU], was calculated by a mixture of logand linear-trapezoidal summations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The Cmax was recorded directly from experimental observations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The Tmax was recorded directly from experimental observations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The concentrations below the lower limit of quantitation (<LLOQ) were set as "missing" for the calculation of PK parameters as well as summary statistics. AUC[TAU], was calculated by a mixture of logand linear-trapezoidal summations.
Time frame: Day 7 (0 hr to 24 hr post dose)
Serial blood samples were collected predose 0 hr, and hr 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 in the double-blind period. Individual subject PK parameter values were derived by non-compartmental methods by a validated PK analysis program, Kinetica®. Actual sampling times were used for PK calculations and nominal times were used for generation of mean plasma concentration-time plots and summaries. Pre-dose sample collection times were changed from negative numbers (based on elapsed time to dose) to zero for the purpose of calculating PK parameters. The concentrations below the lower limit of quantitation (<LLOQ) were set as "missing" for the calculation of PK parameters as well as summary statistics. MR was calculated as the ratio of metabolite to parent AUC(TAU), corrected for molecular weights of dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin 3-O-glucuronide (408.82 and 584.99, respectively).
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2 Trial to Explore the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dapagliflozin as an Add-on to Insulin Therapy in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07696039
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Bergamo, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03263494
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090824
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05211479
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders
Yalova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details